Version: 2008

Comments on: Ouch! Newspaper revenues take biggest plunge on record

Newspaper Association of America says print advertising revenues declined more in 2007 than they have in any year since 1950.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Maybe a Good Thing
by clowdy4 March 28, 2008 6:26 PM PDT
For years Blood Sweat and Tears have been the main selling
ingredient for the papers. In other words, 95 percent crap and 5
percent believable.
A school shooting yesterday/ murder suicide today, sheep gave
birth to human babies 10 years ago.
It's about time! Start printing something worth reading and sales
will rise again.
Reply to this comment
Huh?
by therealbean March 29, 2008 12:53 AM PDT
What are you talking about? Do you read any of the leading newspapers in the US (NYT, WSJ, LA Times, Wash Post)?

The drop in advertising has nothing to do with readers protesting bad coverage, but rather readers getting their news online.
newspapers.... going.... going....
by mrwildman1 March 28, 2008 6:26 PM PDT
the NY times as well as a bunch of others are (to me anyways) leaning Way to the left. they don't share the same values. and i spend my time (and money)reading that dribble. i listen to talk radio a lot while I'm in my delivery truck.
i share the same attitude as Howie Carr and Sean hannity. not so much with rush. he's a bit much for me to listen to. and if i want something like the newspaper, i get on-line. i have anything i want. and like this blog, i can voice my opine.
Reply to this comment
It shows!
by fourthestate March 31, 2008 6:33 AM PDT
And one can tell by some of the opinions of the bloggers on this site that they don't read anything, let alone newspapers. The illiteracy reeks!
jt
another article: on the media and the sub-prime
by josephXY March 28, 2008 9:14 PM PDT
in the same publication appeared another article
that might be of interest:
editor & publisher: Where Was Media When Sub-Prime
Disaster Unfolded?
http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003781122

If we were long on the edge of "disaster" with a "financial nuclear winter" waiting in the wings, why were American news consumers among the last to know?
Reply to this comment
quit listening to mainstream...
by Jamesmeredith2 March 29, 2008 5:31 AM PDT
Perhaps when they only cover what the corporations want then people such as ourselves no longer read mainscream media...
Reply to this comment
People are realizing what a waste print news is
by Leria March 29, 2008 5:37 AM PDT
For anything. I mean, I can get better job listings online. I can get better news and faster news online on the newspapers websites.

Basically, print news is going to go the way of the dodo, and I am glad for that. No more wasted paper that I have to recycle, which is 90% of what I recycle every week.
Reply to this comment
Suggestions
by niceguy2931 March 29, 2008 6:36 AM PDT
Suggest one buy i.e. the NY Times on Sunday learn a few things, then take advantage of all the on line (free) reads they provide. For $6 per week you will get all you need.
Reply to this comment
Newspapers
by fourthestate March 31, 2008 6:25 AM PDT
God help us if we ever lose newspapers, our government watchdogs!
jt
Reply to this comment
It's evident
by fourthestate March 31, 2008 6:32 AM PDT
And one can tell by some of the opinions of the bloggers on this site that they don't read anything, let alone newspapers. The illiteracy reeks!
jt
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement