Comments on: FCC rapped over handling of citizen complaints
Government auditors claim the regulators don't act on thousands of complaints about telemarketing calls, indecent TV, and the like, but the regulators sharply disagree.
Government auditors claim the regulators don't act on thousands of complaints about telemarketing calls, indecent TV, and the like, but the regulators sharply disagree.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
last year of telemarketing calls, most auto dial. Repeat calls
when they refused to take me off, refusal to identify who the
company was.
I think the kicker was this year, now that the calls have died
down, I get a call to "verify" I am the person on the cable
account in another city, different name, DIFFERENT AREA CODE.
How in tarnation did that cable provider allow it to be set up in
the first place! When they asked for a Jane Doe in City 2, was
like, Um, thats a different area code guys... You better do your
homework before setting up these accounts.
Thankfully I can record my phone in this state. It's a life saver
in proving what was said.
I sent multiple complaints to the FCC. No response at all. Unless your complaining about obscenities on TV you probably get no response. So much for serving the interest of the public.
They MUST be able to weight those complaints accordingly, and any congressman who says otherwise shouldn't be a congressman much longer.
Although the brokerage I work for now is almost annoyingly compliant about these types of issues, I?ve worked for others in the past that will just disclaim any FCC Flags that come up for certain products (say, computer monitors from China, etc?).
When I first started in this business I found it amazing how little anyone (US Customs) cared about compliant goods and the FCC forms that go along with them. Forms stating, who that manufacturer is and what its product identifier is and such.
I remember when I first started in this industry, and trying to be compliant by the way, I had a shipment of wireless routers from Germany coming into the country from a particular client. They had no FCC paperwork to go along with these items so I went down to Customs and asked them how I should handle it. Should I put these in bond to a bonded warehouse until we get the proper paperwork? Should I do an I.E. (Immediate Export) bond to send them back to Canada until we get the proper paperwork? Etc?
The response I got, and the same one you?ll get today 99/100 times is, ?don?t worry about it, that doesn?t even show up on my screen anyway?.
That truly boggles my mind. This was only months after 9/11, and to see that even the most fundamental things, let alone the most obvious, are still today so severely overlooked is just sad.
Basically, what this means is you can sit there in front of your CRT monitor, or your wireless router, wireless keyboard and mouse and think ?oh, I know that the Rads (yeah, they still use Rads as the ?reporting quantity?) of radiation are under the recommended levels because my government is on the lookout for these devices. But, you?re severely mistaken.
I?m typing this right now sitting in front of my 21? LCD monitor (in the US) that has no FCC labeling or Country of Origin markings on it, because it was given to me by a Canadian company as a ?gift? and made it through the border with no problems, obviously.
I don?t know about you, but that scares me a little more than ?I?m paying too much for my cell phone? or ?they said a bad word on TV!? I?m a little more concerned with the health factors involved with using some of these foreign devices and that no one is really properly determining if these devices are actually safe to use.