Comments on: Netflix picks Blu-ray, rattles HD DVD
The online movie rental service's choice to go exclusively Blu-ray doesn't bode well for the embattled HD DVD format.
The online movie rental service's choice to go exclusively Blu-ray doesn't bode well for the embattled HD DVD format.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
When you have a disc with a certain resolution, thats it. You can't "convert" it to a higher resolution. The best you can do is scale up the data to try to pretend you had a higher resolution.
just because your screen is a 1080p screen and you're feeding it with an older DVD player doesn't mean your DVD player is outputting 1080p. Its outputting the normal (I think 720i) resolution, and your TV is trying its best to make it look like it had more information.
Its like saying your 100Gb harddrive can store 150Gb of data "reasonably well" because you can compress that data, when comparing to buying the new 200Gb harddrive.
Other than that, a pretty solid review of the entire battle.
Personally, I bought a Blu-Ray player solely because my local
blockbuster rent's movies for it. The choice was simple since I
don't buy movies and rarely, if ever, have watched one more then
once.
Die HD DVD, Die!
Go ahead, flame me. It won't change things.
From a techincal perspective, there is little difference between Bluray and HD-DVD besides capacity. I have seen both and I do not buy any of the arguments that either has a visual or audible advantage over the other. Bluray discs are currently more difficult to copy than HD-DVD.
Given the fact that HD-DVDs are cheaper to produce than Bluray and HD DVD players are cheaper leads me to believe that the Bluray camp (Sony) is paying off movie studios, hardware vendors, and retailers to adopt the format rather than giving the consumer a chance to make a choice.
I hope that the internet soon kills the video 'disc' all together the same way that it is killing the CD. I also hope there is a thorough investigation into this 'format war'
Then the content providers will not have to pick a physical medium based on the relative difficulty in pirating it; which is the main goal for both formats. HD content is a distant 2nd goal.
- Where's the journalism?
- by trey.hutcheson February 12, 2008 5:16 AM PST
- Where does the line between journalism and an electronic diary? I understand this is a blog, but I would expect more from a journalist than such banal statements as the following:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)"...the quality improvement over DVD isn't as apparent to anyone but the hardcore videophile crowd. Plus, standard DVD players that can convert discs to high-def resolution get the job done reasonably well."
The first part of the quote is particularly inflammatory. If you're going to make such an assertion, back it up with credible references.
While I will admit that there exists large numbers of people that don't perceive an advantage with high-def media(HDM), my personal experience has been quite the opposite. The majority of people I know personally have an interest in HDM, and can plainly see the leaps in visual quality. I would hardly call my step-father(60 years old), my wife, or any of my coworkers' wives' "harcore videophiles."