Version: 2008

Comments on: Update: Thinnest notebook crown belongs to Sharp

The Muramasas from the mid 00s are the skinniest computers we can dig up.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (36 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Sharp PC1211 pocket computer
by mbenedict January 16, 2008 5:59 PM PST
More than 25 years(!) ago my dad brought home a Sharp PC1211 pocket computer. It had dual CPUs, 4k of RAM, a Qwerty keyboard, was just 0.7" thick and could fit in your pocket. You could program it in BASIC and attach it to a mini-printer.

As a kid I was so fascinated by it, I taught myself how to program by reading its owner's manual. We later bought a Commodore and the PC1211 was soon forgotten.

But looking back, what a remarkable device! It was truly ahead of its time.

Link:

http://www.vintagecalculators.com/html/sharp_pc1211_tandy_trs80_pc1.html
Reply to this comment
wow
by lesliejs January 16, 2008 7:56 PM PST
thats amazing. I didnt realize they attempted that way back then. thanks for the link.
Yes Excellent
by keyringwest January 21, 2008 6:29 AM PST
That was excellent machine. Sharp always innovative. Camera-
Phone with partnership of J-Phone and Mr. Kahn in Japan was
maybe biggest innovation in japanese market in last decade with
Nintendo Wii. Sharp great company.
Wait for it...wait for it...
by mrorie January 16, 2008 6:13 PM PST
OMG CNET IS BIASED AGAINST APPLE!!!!!!!one!!!!

You know those posts are coming. Figured I'd get it out of the way.
Reply to this comment
Why?
by ewelch January 16, 2008 6:44 PM PST
When you're right, you're right.

But the question wasn't the thinnest in history. Name someone
who makes a thinner one now.

Just like the tallest man in history is probably taller than the
current tallest man in the world.

Being the tallest "small person" in the world is still not that BIG a
deal.
Who cares?
by applusr January 16, 2008 6:31 PM PST
Ford has the best truck, or was it Toyota, no it GMC.
Like the auto companies, you always here the same claims. Who cares if it is the thinest, or if a computer that was made 6, 10 15 years ago was..I sure don't.
Reply to this comment
And the battery on my old Dell 233 laptop. . .
by rcrusoe January 16, 2008 8:07 PM PST
outlasted just about anything you can buy today! Who cares?

Jobs said the Air was the thinnest notebook in the world, and it
is because no one currently makes anything thinner.

Apple isn't perfect, but it apparently really chaps some people
because they are successful.
Reply to this comment
Camera for Cell Phones
by Moneyyen January 16, 2008 8:34 PM PST
You state in your story that the first camera for Cell Phones came
out in the year 2000. That may be true for the US but in many
parts of the world, there were cameras on phones long before the
year 2000. I am an American who has been living here in Japan
now for 20 years and we have had cameras long before the year
2000. I often find that technologies like this come out years after
Japan. I have pictures of my wife and I dating from my cell phone
over 12 years ago.
Reply to this comment
camera cell phones
by michael kanellos January 17, 2008 8:46 AM PST
Actually it was 2000, although prototypes were shown earlier. There were also cameras will cellular links and modems on them before that, but they were really cameras, not phones. The first camera phone was from Kyocera in 1999. I contacted a bunch of companies to research this (sharp was one). It was later than I thought too, but those were the results.

But you are right. They get stuff a lot earlier there than we do here.
View reply
Apple makes headlines... Again!
by jowewo January 16, 2008 8:43 PM PST
This article just proves one thing. Apple is the company everybody tries to measure up to. Someone had to dig an article and some specs from god knows where to compare a "gadget" to... Apple.

Every time Apple comes up with a new product all we hear is "could be better", "was done before", etc. The truth is Apple almost always make a strike with each new hardware or software.

Guys, get over it. Apple is the hottest IT company out there, and there is no runner-up...
Reply to this comment
That's strange
by aka_tripleB January 16, 2008 10:06 PM PST
While I do also consider Apple, but never go with Apple because never measures up to what I want my computer to do. And this time it's because Apple is making claims that may or may not be true. AND everyone is just slitting hairs over something stupid.

And here's a PC that's been out for about a year that is not much larger than the MBA.
http://store.shopfujitsu.com/fpc/Ecommerce/buildseriesbean.do?series=ST5100&ptype=TB
View reply
Apple does it to themselves
by DrtyDogg January 17, 2008 3:31 AM PST
By making outlandish claims and calling everything they do "innovative." People see that and want to point out that they are wrong.
View all 2 replies
Not thin, how heavy
by Dango517 January 16, 2008 10:56 PM PST
Even very thin can be quite heavy. I'd rather they focus on less weight, improving there speed and power and keeping them cooler. A laptop is a tool, pretty is important but secondary.
Reply to this comment
Read the article
by Andronicus January 17, 2008 7:35 AM PST
The article clearly states the sharp laptop was "2.1 pounds, less than the 3-pound MacBook Air".
Hear, hear!
by rinzaidavid January 19, 2008 7:28 AM PST
Deeply concur. Been waiting for a Mac laptop under three pounds since 2003, after a mixed experience with a Sony Vaio (srt-7? --I think)
Just compromised again on a deal a friend of a friend set up for me, got an Olivetti for around 800 (in pesos Argentinos) & it's not quite hiking friendly at just over 2 kilos, or 4.5 pounds...
Just when you think Apple is on track
by jscott418 January 17, 2008 7:51 AM PST
Just as we thought Apple would gain market share from PC's
Steve Jobs has to introduce a dud of sorts. Steve has a habit of
going so long and then he has to intro something unique. It's
too bad , because another good product for the masses and
Apple would be a household name. Kinda like Dell in the 90's
and early 2000's.
But it goes to show that Apple is still a geek lover's niche and
has no intention of trying to sway the bottom feeders on the PC
side.
But I guess their is plenty of Mac fans who will buy a overpriced
and under featured product like the MacBook Air.
Reply to this comment
ohh
by applusr January 17, 2008 3:43 PM PST
You have already pre-ordered yours I see.

by the way that what many consumers are looking for.
Sharp cell phone camera
by keyringwest January 17, 2008 11:09 AM PST
In reading this, it seems that Sharp did build the first cell phone
camera in Japan, but that Mr. Kahn was their partner. This was
launched in early 2000 in Tokyo between J-Phone, Sharp and
Kahn. Hence if Sharp did indeed build the first camera phone,
Kahn, J-phone and Sharp share the credit. Kahn claims to have
wirelessly shared the first picture in 1997 publicly, which also
seems to be confirmed. Several companies before had cameras
in phones but none integrated with a commercial infrastructure.
Obviously the story of the birth of the baby is a bit of an urban
legend. But the facts do make sense. Is that what you emant in
your piece?
Reply to this comment
cell phone camera
by michael kanellos January 17, 2008 12:46 PM PST
Sharp had the second. Kyocera had the first in 1999. It's also unclear, in my mind, if Kahn worked with Sharp. there's a wired piece from 2000 where Kahn talks about himself and MOTOROLA. Never mentions Sharp. Moto ended up being third.

also, what Kahn did was hook a modem to a camera. (he didn't have a unified piece of hardware.) That had been done by olympus and others first. Thus, it's tough to give him credit there too.

I think people just like his story so they give him credit.
View reply
Wrong again. MM10 NOT thinner... :)
by Kricke242 January 17, 2008 4:27 PM PST
Here is the Data Sheet (pdf), clearly stating the thickness as.

"0.54" (min.)/0.78" (max.)"
"3.7 mm (min.)/19.6 mm (max.)"

The max. is the interesting point.

http://ec1.images-amazon.com/media/i3d/01/A/man-migrate/MANUAL000043313.pdf

However, as I said in the other post, the "Toshiba Protege 2000" is thinner than the MBA, but not the Mitsubishi.


http://cdgenp01.csd.toshiba.com/content/product/pdf_files/detailed_specs/portege_2000.pdf
Reply to this comment
crazy man
by michael kanellos January 18, 2008 11:34 AM PST
Totally forgot about the portege. And it had a good processor. The data sheet I had on sharp didn't have max min. hence that issue.

The strange part in all of this is how sharp, mitsu and toshiba all did something really thin but never got attention.
Apple Fanboys would belive if Jobs said he created the world ;)
by czarOus January 18, 2008 10:19 PM PST
Actually here is the link which states the thinnest laptop Period.
h**p://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notebook-supermodel/intel-unveils-worlds-thinnest-laptop-almost-skinny-as-a-razr-263359.php
replace ** with tt
Reply to this comment
Apple
by keyringwest January 19, 2008 1:38 AM PST
Apple software is "thinest" and "smartest". In other words, if one
takes same machine and runs windows nd OSX on both, OSX
performance better. That's because Apple optimize for only one
hardware system. However, to the user that is important.
True
by ppierce365 February 10, 2008 10:40 AM PST
They really would, they don't realize how much Macs really suck.
Thinnest notebook with 13.3" wide screen and full keyboard
by dnovo January 19, 2008 9:03 AM PST
When qualified with the keyboard and screen size I think the
assertion is real.
Reply to this comment
Thinnest notebook with 13.3" wide screen and full keyboard
by dnovo January 19, 2008 9:03 AM PST
When qualified with the keyboard and screen size I think the
assertion is true.
Reply to this comment
Mac Air Blows
by CanuckBoater January 20, 2008 9:05 PM PST
The Mac Air is a stripped down computer. Should be priced at $1000 not $1800.
Reply to this comment
Is Ferrari a striped down pick-up truck?
by keyringwest January 20, 2008 11:51 PM PST
Is is challenging to compare different things? Hardware
specification is a very small part of whole story. If person doesn't
mind elegant and solid OSX and is happy with Vista, then value of
Apple offering maybe in question. Else it is very valuable small
elegant two-seater sports ultra-portable running OSX.
Bogus Figures
by xlhzum January 31, 2008 11:43 PM PST
You are completely full of crap.

You are comparing the thickest part of the macbook air (0.76") with the thinnest part of the Sharp Laptop (0.54")

Any objective look at the real figures clearly shows that the sharp laptop is WAY THICKER.

Macbook Air 0.16" - 0.76"
Sharp 'Muramasas'0.54" - 0.78"

Keep your anti-apple BS to your self you pathetic Microsoft fan-boy.
Reply to this comment
worlds thinnest notebook
by nick35388 April 14, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
Altho I am writing this on one of my macs, I do have to comment.
I happen to own an Actius MM10 Muramasa notebook from Sharp,
It is thinner and lighter than the macbook air. A bit underpowered
with a PIII processor and 256 (not upgradeable) ram. It runs Xp
home just fine. Aslo has a gorgeous screen and retractable
keyboard. Nick
Reply to this comment
by lane1986 June 14, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
I have one I'm using right now, Fujitsu Q2010
Reply to this comment
(36 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement