Comments on: FTC: We won't block Google-DoubleClick merger
Controversial ad deal valued at $3.1 billion "unlikely to substantially lessen competition," agency rules in 4-1 vote.
Controversial ad deal valued at $3.1 billion "unlikely to substantially lessen competition," agency rules in 4-1 vote.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
- Zero Public Benefit
- by Renegade Knight December 20, 2007 7:09 AM PST
- Such a merger has zero public benefit. Both companies would get along fine without each other and grow and prosper. Combined, I guess I need to ramp up my anti spy er...spyware efforts.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- WRONGgggggggggggg
- by R.Jefferson December 20, 2007 7:47 AM PST
- ...My best Kevin Spacey Lex Luther impersonation.....
- Like this
-
- Doubleclick on Google (NOT!!!)
- by royc December 20, 2007 9:24 AM PST
- IMHO You are right on both counts.
- Like this View reply
Processing -
(4 Comments)Meanwhile XM And Sirus one of which will fail without a merger are taking up much more FCC brain power. This is one of the few cases where the best solution is the merger rather than letting one fail.
With this new tag team, Google will already know what we want to purchase (because they have terabytes of our spending habits) and they will ship us items (because they know where we live and retain our financial info) and direct us to web site ?we might be interested in? without any thought on our part.
Gosh isn?t the future great!
Update your HOSTS file to include both.
I have been using Google for all my searches but once the merger is completed I will stop.
I guess M$ live search is the lesser of the 2 EVILS!!