Version: 2008

Comments on: DNA dating site predicts chemical romance

A DNA-based matchmaking service claims to hook up couples who will share an aromatic attraction.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Bogus nonsense
by TogetherinParis December 17, 2007 3:14 PM PST
In humans and tadpoles, we're more attracted to those from
another pond whether we're genetically related or not. It's why
kibbutz kids who are unrelated but grow up together in special
dorms as children never marry within the kibbutz community.
Faulty science, faulty premise, if noble purpose.
Oddly enough, though, a simple taste test could make this site a
success. It's for sale if you want it.
Reply to this comment
The only important point
by Rick Cavaretti December 18, 2007 7:31 AM PST
Let's cut to the only important point here: They'll partner you up
with a 'matched' someone which allow you to have more fun in bed.
Where do I sign?
Reply to this comment
Dean Hamer's Comments
by ScientificMatch December 20, 2007 5:55 PM PST
I was very disappointed to see Dean Hamer's comments in the article.

If he disagrees with our technology, I respectfully ask what he disagrees with, specifically. We cite over 40 peer-reviewed scientific papers to support our matching process. Does he disagree with any of the articles cited? Did we exaggerate any of their findings? Did we cite obscure sources that contradict the prevailing body of knowledge? We've worked earnestly over the years to ensure that our matching process is based on solid scientific evidence.

Even more disheartening was his suggestion that we "rip-off" our customers. We have nothing but reverence and a profound sense of commitment to the people who use our service.

In the United States, off-line matchmaking services rarely charge less then $3,000 per year. ScientificMatch is significantly less, and yet we offer something that no one else can: chemistry. That seems far from a rip-off.

When Dean Hamer suggests that the more appropriate alternative is to go around smelling people's underarms, it undermines his ability to appraise matchmaking services.

Eric Holzle
Founder & President
ScientificMatch.com
Reply to this comment
by great9122 January 20, 2009 1:48 AM PST
In the early days there was no need for this kind of an institution
like a dating bureau or a marriage bureau as this was done and over
with when the persons were young and marriages were made in heaven
and there was no time to feel lonely or find the need to be searching
for a partner. Divorce was also not a frequently happening thing as
society looked down up on it and once you were married it was for
keeps.

john
< a href ="http://adult.talkingdating.com">Adult Dating </a>
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement