Version: 2008

Comments on: Price drops ahead for solid-state drives

With NAND prices predicted to drop significantly over the next year, a 64GB solid-state drive for close to $300 by the end of 2008 is in the realm of possibility.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
This will be fun!
by inachu November 29, 2007 6:22 AM PST
Just think!

No more running chkdsk or at least in theory we will no longer need chkdsk as there is no read and write head. Only time will tell if data still gets distorted on solid state drives.

Defrag will go a lot faster too.
Raaa!
Reply to this comment
Problems with solid state
by The_Decider November 29, 2007 2:30 PM PST
They have a fairly short life span in terms of number of writes.
Need..more...capacity, Jim
by SteveCherry November 29, 2007 8:07 AM PST
This indeed sounds like a lot of fun, but I am holding my breath (and my wallet) for better capacity...much better capacity than 64G. As digital camera sensors increase in resolution, those of us using laptops for use in photography, for instance, are going to want these to meet our current spinning disk capacity - at a minimum before spending that kind of dough for a drive and the associated installation fees.

Also - laptop users typically fit the travel-intensive demographic, and they want things like stored video to keep them entertained while they wait for lightning storms to pass at DFW.

Here's hoping that competition from names like SanDisk will infuse some speed into Moore's law.

Best e-gards,
Steve Cherry
dailyframe.com
Reply to this comment
Solid State Drives...nice, but...
by Jon N. November 29, 2007 8:51 AM PST
Its all very good for us that technology is getting to the point where we can start ditching motorized storage...but wait! Isn't this the calculation? Every year, the price of this kind of tech goes down 50%. So the price for a 64GB next year should be $475. Still to high a cost for too little storage. At this rate we won't see viable, cost-efficient solid state drives in the rage of 120GB-240GB for another 5-10 years. We have already reached the 1 Terabyte level with motorized drives. A S.S.D.(Solid State Drive)this size could increase our wait even further into the future. Seagate, are you listening?
Reply to this comment
It can't happen soon enough
by chash360 November 29, 2007 9:58 AM PST
I have been waiting, asking and begging for 100% solid state computers for quite sometime. Even at the expensive price there are niche markets that can really benefit from such devices. Particularly in the Broadcast and Recording industries where you need a noiseless computer (no fan, no spinning disks). Random access that really speeds things up, instant sleep, and wakeup modes, lower power consumption, less heat. I would argue the 'no moving parts to wear out', but of course they have not fixed the wearout problem with flash either, but it still can rival spinning disks in longevity.
Back in the late 80's or early 90's HP made an omnibook laptop that could be setup all solid state, and the system memory was static RAM (similar to flash) you could sleep and wakeup instantly, no rebooting, or even loading needed (serious it was as fast as turning your TV On and Off, maybe faster). Way better than the M$ implementation of any of its suspended modes (and about half a dozen years earlier). I can't wait to have a new computer with these capabilities, 64GB is more than enough for a laptop (M$ OS's will require some debloating, but what else is new) if you need more send it over the wire or air to a storage system.
Reply to this comment
Shockproof
by zroth November 29, 2007 11:45 AM PST
I sometimes work in areas where the equipment takes a beating from heavy shocks and vibrations. Normal hard drives don't last long in such an environment.

So, I'm really looking forward to a time when SSDs are easy available to the general public. The lack of moving parts should ensure that they will withstand shocks much better.
Reply to this comment
Hybrid approach will bring success...
by Source00 November 29, 2007 11:47 AM PST
So I see the major benefit of this for notebooks is using a hybrid approach... at least in the short term. Traditional hard drives seem like they will always outpace flash based hard drives on capacity density and price, so why not use a hybrid approach... Flash based drives for working memory in the <100 GB range, traditional storage for archival and long term storage (1-2 TB+ range). My first reaction to this story was that a 64 GB drive is way too small... then I looked at my computer which is stuffed full of things I rarely, if ever, use or look at. A less efficient but cheaper storage device would be a great place for all that stuff... whereas I want my performance to be as quick and efficient as possible for my day to day work and 64 GB is more than enough to manage that...
Reply to this comment
Solid State Drives
by Michael00360 November 29, 2007 2:15 PM PST
There is now way that I could use a solid state drive until it reaches into the hundreds of gigabytes and comes down to current hard drive prices. Hopefully by then, they will be even better .

I just hope that doesn't take to long.
Reply to this comment
I want a 32 gig Nano!
by lingsun November 29, 2007 5:19 PM PST
I want a 32 gig Nano! I'll settle for a 16.
Reply to this comment
My only wish for solid state drives is.....
by inachu November 29, 2007 6:12 PM PST
they are produced in IDE and SATA formats.
Reply to this comment
Speed
by timber2005 November 29, 2007 6:50 PM PST
As you are well aware, there are may speeds to IDE and SATA.

Mainly, IDE is 100/133, SATA is 150/300.
Now 133 to 150 isn't much of a change, but if you consider that flash based drives can constantly use that full 150, and be a bottleneck... you want to go for the fastest conneciton available. Harddrives are one of the biggest bottlenecks of the system. Else we wouldn't need RAM to make up for the drives slowness, or CPU cache to make up for ram slowness. Imagine one day if we can make a SSD as fast as ram. And here you want ide :p
IDE is going away for a faster, stable technology. Even in external devices, and CD/DVD type medias (aka, blu-ray and HD DVD)
View reply
by jgargano03 February 12, 2009 8:02 PM PST
Why don't they just put the OS on a ROM chip? Like they did for the Commodore 64? Imagine vista loading in 1 second. I envisioned SSD's since 1998. I'm not in any rush to go to SSD until they fix all the kinks.
...or Apple
by SpiritWater November 29, 2007 9:11 PM PST
Either one has the tech clout to make solid state drives mainstream.

Looking forward to seeing a ZunePhone from Microsoft with some 32Gb flash. ;-)

Break the Wedge!
www.breakthewedge.com
Reply to this comment
Drivers?!
by rsatter January 7, 2008 8:45 AM PST
Drivers are not needed. Flash driver are just like hard drives so the only driver is for the controller which the drive connects. The connector is IDE or SATA. You can literally drop in replacement SSD for your laptop.
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement