Version: 2008

Comments on: Toyota takes baby steps to plug-in car

In the face of GM's swift timetable for the Chevy Volt, rival automaker says it has good reason to move more slowly on its own plug-in electric car.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Toyota: Baby steps to the plug-in car
by reidjazz October 22, 2007 8:56 AM PDT
Anyone know what the life of the batteries in these cars is? It would be a drag if the life of the batteries was only 1/2 the life of the car.
Reply to this comment
Life Of The Batteries...
by open-mind October 22, 2007 11:04 AM PDT
I think they want the batteries to last the "life of the car", which can mean different things to different people.

In the case of the Volt, you could probably assume several hundred thousand miles before the batteries may need to be replaced. And even then the car will still work, but its electric-only range may just be reduced. By the time that day arrives, the cost of lithium battery packs should be much lower than today.
Matter of Words
by danielwsmithee October 22, 2007 9:28 AM PDT
"Toyota is taking into account that not all consumers, despite vocal environmentalist groups, may be interested in a car that has to be re-charged daily"

They are right about one thing nobody is interested in a car you "HAVE TO" recharge everyday. They want a car that "CAN BE" recharged everyday. Nobody wants a purely electric vehicle they want a plug-in hybrid. Which means if your battery starts to get low your combustion engine kicks in. If you keep your batteries charged you use little to no gas.
Reply to this comment
Scenario: Gas prices leap up for 6 mos...
by DoughboyNJ October 22, 2007 10:33 AM PDT
...and millions of plug-hybrid owners decide to jack in every nite to avoid buying gas.

Plausible?

What happens to the electric grid? Do elec producers even have that much juice available to sell?

I think these decisions have to be thought through very carefully and things have to evolve in careful deliberate ways.
View all 2 replies
Toyota is dysfunctional
by theBike45 October 22, 2007 10:32 AM PDT
I simply could not believe the remarks by the Toyota spkesman. You'd think he's been living on Mars the past year or so. His preposterously self serving and false statement about the need for safety indicates that either he's ignorant about
third generation lithium ion technology that GM and others are devloping, or, far more likely, is refucing to admit the obvius : Toyota doesn't HAVE any third generation li ion batteries and are stuck with their first and second generation
technology. He can't be so dumb as to not be aware of the spec of the upcoming Chevy VOLT and Opel Flextreme , both highly publicized and discussed serial plug-ins. We even know the capacities of the battery pack, its weight, its lifespan , the car's electric mileage, etc. This Toyota exec wants us to believe that they can't
type in www.gm-volt.com and find all that info (and more)? I wasn't born yesterday, Toyota, and the fact that Chinese automaker BYD is building an 08 plug-in for $19,000 with a 60 miles range while Toyota claims it's impossible for them to build one with a 20 mile range without addding $10,000 to the cost of a Prius hybrid, leads me to the inescapable conclusion that Toyota is now officially a dysfunctional organaization. They can't possibly be this stupid. He claims plug-ins won't be popular (because, he says, his wife wouldn't plug in her car) when surveys have shown that half the buying public are aware of plug-ins and half are interested in buying one. Apparently, Toyota execs make decisions about U.S. public demand by asking their wives (!!!!!!)
Reply to this comment
GM volt doesn't exist
by bobcode October 22, 2007 10:54 AM PDT
It's a propaganda car, whereas Toyota discusses the present. The Tesla is $100,000 and still not finalized. The Prius already costs $10,000 more than the average small car. GM discusses future battery tech when discussing the Volt.
View reply
Tested in spring 2008 Purchase in 2010
by mstrclark October 22, 2007 10:35 AM PDT
So no matter what the testing shows they are going to see them anyway. Even if they are a complete failure, poor quality, etc.

That's typical of Detroit manufactures.
Reply to this comment
error in article
by Ex-MislTech October 22, 2007 10:59 AM PDT
The bill would force automakers to either improve the mileage of trucks and sport utility vehicles and/or introduce more efficient cars in their lineup to bring down their overall fleet average.</i?

I think you mean bring "up" the average mpg.
Reply to this comment
Future battery tech
by Ex-MislTech October 22, 2007 11:05 AM PDT
Yeah they are betting the success based on EE stor.

Its not really a battery though, it is a nanotech
based Ultra-capacitor.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/page1/?a=f
Reply to this comment
By "they" you mean a zero-profit Canadian Car maker?
by sanenazok October 22, 2007 11:41 AM PDT
The only customer of EEStor is a company called ZENN which is controlled by the same people as EEStor and makes cars that go as "fast" as 25 mph:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZENN

Neither GM nor Toyota has any interest in EEStor
Li-Ion vs. Nanotech Ultra-capacitor
by Ex-MislTech October 22, 2007 11:13 AM PDT
Lithium Ion have a short lifespan, and their
performance drops as time adds up.

GM is betting on these guys being done in time,
and if it happens it could really help them
out of the bad spot they are in.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/page1/?a=f
Reply to this comment
One tiny problem...Eestor is all hype
by sanenazok October 22, 2007 11:36 AM PDT
Don't spread this garbage.

Even C|Net ran a story on EEStor hype. Before you spread this imaginary crap check out:
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13512_1-9771053-23.html?tag=bl

If the math doesn't make sense, the product doesn't work. No real company like GM believes EEStor and their imaginary products.
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement