Comments on: Adobe flashes more looks at online Photoshop Express
At a sneak peek session, Adobe shows off Photoshop Express, a slick Web application that quickly makes changes to images.
At a sneak peek session, Adobe shows off Photoshop Express, a slick Web application that quickly makes changes to images.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
With online applications, users will have to login to a server and authenticate their rights to use the software with each use. This should, at least temporarily, hinder hackers from releasing cracked applications and distributing them freely.
Companies will also have the ability to license software on a subscription basis, rather than a buy once, use for life model. Imagine having to throw down a renewal fee every year rather than a one time buy.
This could prove to benefit consumers if they can pay a monthly or yearly fee that is lower than the cost to buy outright. Another option might be a pay per use model. If you need to use an app just once, why pay for lifetime rights to it.
One benefit to both parties is in the form of updates. Applications only need to be updated on the server side, saving the cost and time of distributing and notifying customers of updates, and allowing users to always have access to the latest versions of software.
They can charge you monthly or yearly fees for its use or for
"premium" versions. 3) they can target ads at you based on the
types of content you work on 4) it's a portal to selling you the
full $800 photoshop or the entire CS. 5) Staves off Microsoft
web domination.
Oh, sorry... you were probably asking about the benefits to end
users. 1) Flash applications are real purdy and so full of sizzle.
Oooh! Ahhh! 2) Works on any web browser (as long as it's IE 7 on
Vista.) ;-)
With online applications, users will have to login to a server and authenticate their rights to use the software with each use. This should, at least temporarily, hinder hackers from releasing cracked applications and distributing them freely.
Companies will also have the ability to license software on a subscription basis, rather than a buy once, use for life model. Imagine having to throw down a renewal fee every year rather than a one time buy.
This could prove to benefit consumers if they can pay a monthly or yearly fee that is lower than the cost to buy outright. Another option might be a pay per use model. If you need to use an app just once, why pay for lifetime rights to it.
One benefit to both parties is in the form of updates. Applications only need to be updated on the server side, saving the cost and time of distributing and notifying customers of updates, and allowing users to always have access to the latest versions of software.
Every (offline) product for the past 8 years can do this. There has to be VALUE to the consumer if they are going to use this. It will only work if it can beat facebook/flickr/picasa at all the other stuff like uploading, sharing, social networking, print ordering, etc. People don't want to use different products, they want a one-product does all suite, easy, fast, and FREE.
- by dunn3r-2k8 July 24, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
- eoin-2k8
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)