Comments on: Viacom chief: We're sticking with DRM
Media conglomerate's head says antipiracy efforts "will usher in an unprecedented period of creative output across the globe."
Media conglomerate's head says antipiracy efforts "will usher in an unprecedented period of creative output across the globe."
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
output across the globe,"
Sure, just like the Sovet Union ushered in peace and prosperity.
right there, where you know...
Perhaps their group can develope DRM technologies that will force the end user to watch the content within a few hours and then, *poof* it's gone. Another force them to watch it within 2 days. Also, have all sorts of different pricing strategies and throw in certain content that can only be burned and watched once. Make it so confussing that nobody will want it.
So Good Luck Viacom. See ya when you're getting taking over.
Music listeners must unite against big corporations like Viacon, now I have said it.
By not buying music from big corporations like Viacon.
either, that would hurt them doubly.
If they can make DRM work as well as that Amazon.com song, great.
Oh and Viacom has no right whatsoever to "fair" compensation. They only have the right to try to get paid for their work. The market determines the price. They don't have to like it, but they will live with it.
PS by Their Work I mean the work of the creative people who have placed their work in Viacom's hands since Corporations don't create content. People do.
"Dauman said his company supports fair use and would love to see its popular characters on "every nook and cranny of the Internet," but only if the "artists" behind the content are fairly compensated."
A fair use is a non-infringing use that can be made without permission or compensation.
If this how they (Viacom and other media companies ) think I have little sympathy for them when it comes to piracy. Regarding the new for new laws, I think what he means they don't want them unless they were written for and by Hollywood (like the DMCA).
Wait a minute...
- So... no "net-neutrality"...
- by Had_to_be_said October 2, 2007 9:04 PM PDT
- ...Corporations, and monopolies, should be allowed to do whatever they want.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Oh, and I forgot...
- by Had_to_be_said October 2, 2007 9:13 PM PDT
- AT&Ts, and others, intention to deep-snoop all Internet-traffic:
- Like this
-
(12 Comments)...But, consumers, should have "Trusted Computing" shoved down their throats.
Heres AT&Ts take on "Trusted Computing" (see the "insecure computers" reference in their new "TOS"):
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070930-att-threatens-to-disconnect-subscribers-who-are-critical-of-the-company.html
And, heres a few statements, made recently, regarding the proper future of the Internet... as the former U.S. "Cyber-Czar" sees it...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/02/richard_clarke_speech_trust_online_santa_clara_university_microsoft/
Be afraid... Be, very, afraid...
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070613-att-willing-to-spy-for-nsa-mpaa-and-riaa.html
http://www.mirror99.com/20060907/p2p_bandwidth_hogs_drive_network_operators_to_deploy_deep_packet_inspection_new_report_faia.jspx
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/26/168202
http://origin.arstechnica.com/articles/culture/Deep-packet-inspection-meets-net-neutrality.ars
http://www.networkworld.com/details/6299.html?def