Comments on: Dumbest tech bill so far this year?
You be the judge, but a California state senator has worked himself into a righteous lather over RFID.
You be the judge, but a California state senator has worked himself into a righteous lather over RFID.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
This bill is a good start to putting the kabosh on any plans by the feds to pull something so Orwellian but well within their greedy little power trip.
Congrats to this gentleman for getting this law moving.
Common Sense: All great things that have been invented have been abused by debased minds.
Do you think it was Einstein's idea to nuke the hell out of people, or did he feel misunderstood?
What about a gun? They are just fine. You are the one who chooses what to do with it. People still knock off stores. The person who chooses to do so is abusing the gun.
RFID: great technology. I work with RF all day, it's nothing to be afraid of. But it makes me sick to think of what someone can get away with if they have the right lawyer.
I think the bill is COMMON SENSE.
And so.... why are you whining again?
A hell of a lot of people "unwittingly" received shock "therapy" and ungodly does of pure LSD in order to see if the CIA could wipe the brain clean.
Gee, I know thats just paranoia right??
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cTiONdJJRcw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Stanley
miltary then it is only a matter of time before they will try it on everyone in the name of national security
- Not so dumb, after all
- by make_or_break September 10, 2007 10:30 PM PDT
- An even darker element to RFID implant technology that apparently was buried some time ago during animal testing: there were apparent links to an increased frequency of malignant tumors in lab observations. Sort of forgot to mention that in the PR material touting this as the ultimate in ID tech.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (29 Comments)So...do you really want that (probably) easily hackable, cancer-giving ID chip stuck into your soft fleshy parts, after all?