Comments on: Democrats press Bush to respond to FISA, surveillance requests
Top Democrats in Congress come up with a strategy to force President Bush to respond to their unanswered questions about the National Security Agency's surveillance program.
Top Democrats in Congress come up with a strategy to force President Bush to respond to their unanswered questions about the National Security Agency's surveillance program.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
- Arguably illegal?
- by worsethannormal August 17, 2007 10:43 AM PDT
- If it was "arguably illegal" then the Justice Department would have re-authorized it without judicial over-site. It was not "arguably illegal," it was illegal and unconstitutional (just as any law allowing any government entity to spy on any citizen without a warrant is).
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Yes...arguably
- by sigzero August 17, 2007 3:10 PM PDT
- If it wasn't arguably legal Bush would be in jail. They certainly can
- Like this View reply
Processing -
(3 Comments)"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Funny. It doesn't say "unless the Nation is at war" in there anywhere.
tap going from OUT to IN but cannot tap going IN to OUT without a
warrant. That is why FISA is going to be re-written.