Version: 2008

Comments on: Democrats press Bush to respond to FISA, surveillance requests

Top Democrats in Congress come up with a strategy to force President Bush to respond to their unanswered questions about the National Security Agency's surveillance program.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Arguably illegal?
by worsethannormal August 17, 2007 10:43 AM PDT
If it was "arguably illegal" then the Justice Department would have re-authorized it without judicial over-site. It was not "arguably illegal," it was illegal and unconstitutional (just as any law allowing any government entity to spy on any citizen without a warrant is).

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Funny. It doesn't say "unless the Nation is at war" in there anywhere.
Reply to this comment
Yes...arguably
by sigzero August 17, 2007 3:10 PM PDT
If it wasn't arguably legal Bush would be in jail. They certainly can
tap going from OUT to IN but cannot tap going IN to OUT without a
warrant. That is why FISA is going to be re-written.
View reply
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement