Version: 2008

Comments on: Feds use keylogger to thwart PGP, Hushmail

Court case provides a rare glimpse into how some federal agents deal with encryption: by breaking into a suspect's office, implanting a keylogger and watching what happens from afar.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Clarification
by tpkoons July 10, 2007 6:50 AM PDT
The mirror port Declan speaks of is no more difficult with a dynamic IP. The mirror port copies the data from one physical port to another where the monitoring gear is. If the IP changes the physical port remains the same.
Reply to this comment
Physical port is an oxymoron.
by qwerty75 July 10, 2007 10:51 AM PDT
There is nothing physical about a number
View reply
Ok, this actually makes sense
by scdecade July 10, 2007 7:58 AM PDT
Installing a tracking device on a suspected criminal after a search warrent has been approved. Huh! What a strange and mysterious concept. So after providing a reasonable argument for suspecting someone might be up to something nefarious, a judge approved this action and it was effective at monitoring encrypted computer usage. I just can't believe it. Wouldn't it be better to hire thousands of mindless beauracrats to monitor all internet traffic and then arrest anyone that tries to use encryption?
Reply to this comment
Copy and paste
by richardishere July 10, 2007 9:46 AM PDT
Just be compulsive with copy and paste. Cope articles and other material randomly so you fill up the logger.
Reply to this comment
Wow, key logger, our government is high tech, LMOA
by bobby_brady July 10, 2007 9:56 AM PDT
What a joke our government is.
Reply to this comment
Pushing legality
by NYRBERRY July 10, 2007 10:03 AM PDT
So had they copyrighted their data, wouldn't the DMCA cover this as illegal? Circumventing encryption... Hmm... Shady territory we get into here. As far as port mirroring... Just encrypt your traffic, it'll stick law enforcement back to installing a keylogger (as all little script kiddies already do)
Reply to this comment
encryption myth
by baike July 10, 2007 11:23 AM PDT
Its not shady at all. They got a warrant from a judge. It was a targeted investigtion with proper justification.

Also, encrypting information does not increase the privacy rights of the author. Individual vs. Government privacy rights are completely independent of the mechanisms of recording, securing, or sending. Its only about balancing the greater good and safety of the public against an individual's rights.

This is not new territory. Al Capone was arrested and convicted based on evidence from accounting logs that were 'encoded' to conceal the true nature of the information. The government needed to decrypt those logs before they were valuable evidence. But the fact they were written in code did not reduce in any way the government's authority to collect and use the information.
View all 2 replies
Spooky!
by SeizeCTRL July 10, 2007 11:04 AM PDT
Makes me want to start using Live Boot CDs or booting off USB drive.

Sounds like 1984 is arriving a tad later than expected.
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement