Comments on: Judge rejects Google's anti-Microsoft antitrust bid
Federal judge presiding over Microsoft antitrust case says she'll rely on government attorneys, not Google, to guide enforcement.
Federal judge presiding over Microsoft antitrust case says she'll rely on government attorneys, not Google, to guide enforcement.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Apple has never beed forced to change their OS...and its more closed than windows.
To which the judge quickly jumped in: "Don't you mean hopefully the changes made to resovle the Google concern will benefit consumers...isn't that your main concern. The consumer, not the company?"
"Sure, your Honor. Y-you j-jumped ahead of me on this...I am not an advocate of that company..."
Ahhh, rrright.
The browser market is a perfect example. Microsoft illegally destroyed competing browsers by bundling their one and then did no work or innovation on browsers for the next 7 years because there was no incentive or competition for them to bother.
Now there is Firefox and is it a coincidence that suddenly there is new development for IE.
It's not too hard to understand.
Competition is good for consumers.
- judge sides with Microsoft over Google
- by medinaw June 27, 2007 11:26 AM PDT
- Maybe this Judge is smart enough to see that Google is just as big a monopoly as microsft and should let the government due thier job.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)