Version: 2008
  • On mySimon: Luke Skywalker Doll

Comments on: U.S. broadband A-OK

It's hip to fret about the need for a "national broadband policy," but CNET News.com's Declan McCullagh wonders if the U.S. is really doing so badly.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 2 of 2 pages (66 Comments)
It's the service...
by January 10, 2005 10:33 PM PST
Fat,slow and happy isn't a recipe for broadband competitiveness. Is it really okay for the U.S. to cede its broadband leadership to other countries just because we're a big nation?

If you're like most people you don't think you need broadband until you try it and become addicted instantly. Razor sharp customer service, brutal price competition and the existence hundreds of Internet service providers convinced the masses to welcome dial-up Internet into their homes.

All three of those factors are absent from today's broadband market.

I refuse to believe that polite competition between behmoths will get the job done. Oligopolies are the clogged drains of capitalism. Until we get a few NetZero-style kamikazis in the U.S. broadband market, fat, slow and happy we'll stay.
Reply to this comment
It's the service...
by January 10, 2005 10:33 PM PST
Fat,slow and happy isn't a recipe for broadband competitiveness. Is it really okay for the U.S. to cede its broadband leadership to other countries just because we're a big nation?

If you're like most people you don't think you need broadband until you try it and become addicted instantly. Razor sharp customer service, brutal price competition and the existence hundreds of Internet service providers convinced the masses to welcome dial-up Internet into their homes.

All three of those factors are absent from today's broadband market.

I refuse to believe that polite competition between behmoths will get the job done. Oligopolies are the clogged drains of capitalism. Until we get a few NetZero-style kamikazis in the U.S. broadband market, fat, slow and happy we'll stay.
Reply to this comment
Broadband's astronomical cost
by ggore January 11, 2005 3:21 AM PST
Evidently 99.3% of the US population lives within 4 miles of an interstate highway, because being one of the .7% of the population that doesn't and being a cable modem service provider in Oklahoma, I can say that the cost of a T1 line is astonomical for us. 35 miles south of here and along I-40, the cost of a T1 line is $350/month. Here it costs $993.95/month. Hence the high price I have to charge my customers for service. With the millions of miles of unused fiber just lying in the ground, you'd think the cost would be lower, but it's not.
Reply to this comment
yep
by volterwd January 11, 2005 9:47 AM PST
people in rural communities are screwed... but hey why do they need to live in big houses on absurdly sized lots with wide streets is beyond me... anyways people in the burbs should be able to afford the added cost... but lets face it... cost isnt the issue with broadband penetration, if the government wanted more bandwidth/penetration they would have it... but they are ***************** of the corporate giants
Broadband's astronomical cost
by ggore January 11, 2005 3:21 AM PST
Evidently 99.3% of the US population lives within 4 miles of an interstate highway, because being one of the .7% of the population that doesn't and being a cable modem service provider in Oklahoma, I can say that the cost of a T1 line is astonomical for us. 35 miles south of here and along I-40, the cost of a T1 line is $350/month. Here it costs $993.95/month. Hence the high price I have to charge my customers for service. With the millions of miles of unused fiber just lying in the ground, you'd think the cost would be lower, but it's not.
Reply to this comment
yep
by volterwd January 11, 2005 9:47 AM PST
people in rural communities are screwed... but hey why do they need to live in big houses on absurdly sized lots with wide streets is beyond me... anyways people in the burbs should be able to afford the added cost... but lets face it... cost isnt the issue with broadband penetration, if the government wanted more bandwidth/penetration they would have it... but they are ***************** of the corporate giants
Broadband penetration isnt sufficient
by volterwd January 11, 2005 9:37 AM PST
the rate is a bad indicator because it does not mention that not only does korea have a higher penetration rate but the bandwidth available is significantly higher
Reply to this comment
Broadband penetration isnt sufficient
by volterwd January 11, 2005 9:37 AM PST
the rate is a bad indicator because it does not mention that not only does korea have a higher penetration rate but the bandwidth available is significantly higher
Reply to this comment
Showing 2 of 2 pages (66 Comments)

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement