Comments on: N.Y. lawmaker hopes to ban iPod use in crosswalks
State senator's bill would make it illegal to cross the street tuned into portable electronic devices such as MP3 players and BlackBerrys.
State senator's bill would make it illegal to cross the street tuned into portable electronic devices such as MP3 players and BlackBerrys.
January 2, 2010 6:00 AM PST
January 1, 2010 12:16 PM PST
January 1, 2010 9:20 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
call it 80/20 vs 50/50
Some time back rarely ever got bumped walking on the sidewalk. Now I get bounced and elbowed around so much, I feel like inserting their cell phone or their mp3 player right up their anus.
BTW, the deaf people I know are very well alert of their surroundings. Unlike some idiot that really needs 220 volts ran through their eardrums for some wake up call to put their toys away.
I have to applaud the Senator for this toy (cell phones / mp3 players) legislation of which needs passed like pronto.
would be (far right) fascism. You might want to SERIOUSLY consider
investing in a dictionary (or at least bother to use Google) before
you post idiotic comments.
Most of the expense from people who do not have a helmet is taking care of them for the rest of their lives while they look up at the sealing of a nursing home.
If you want to get your self killed that is cool. Just don't make us pay for you to vedge out.
If nothing else, those who choose to will be "lost in thought".
That's also true of people who do any activity that requires focusing on the world around them---driving, flying, etc.
Put another way--how can we legislate away obliviousness?
The premise is IPOD users can not hear what is going on around them, so why not extend this to people who can NOT hear a thing (Deaf).
What if a deaf person was wearing an IPOD? Would the law apply to that person as well even though it has no effect on him?
- Off topic but ...
- by NoVista February 10, 2007 6:43 AM PST
- an obligatory reference to Yet Another Stupid Politician.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (48 Comments)Anyway ... re previous commentary:
Helmet laws are designed to sell helmets. If you're really worried about the 'vegies' society would have to support, do some research on how inadequate the helmet specifications are.
It's statistically likely the survivors did so because of helmets! As paraplegiacs, quadraplegiacs. Check out the Boston surgeon who's fought Yet Another Stupid Law and rides his bike without a helmet. He'd rather be dead from an accident than a 'veg' due to a law and a device that does not really protect him.
Btw, I don't own a motorcycle. If I did, I'd not likely ride it in NYC unless I was Max Guevara. Maybe not even then.
As for iPod ~victims~ ... if Herbert Spencer were alive today, he' surely say it was a case of 'urban survival of the fittest'.
And for all of you who favour more laws and regulations, remember: you are paying for them.