Comments on: Sony to challenge block on PS2 sales

Will keep selling PlayStation 2 while it appeals court ban on sales of the console and order to pay $90 million in license fees.

[nmcphers]

How American firms compete

Now the Japanese firms will see how American firms have found a way to "compete"...On patents.

blah blah whine whine

Hey Neil, how about the Japanese practice of patent flooding?

This post has been edited for content.
[Edited by: admin on Mar 28, 2005 10:45 AM]

[System Tyrant]

PS3

I wonder how this will affect the playstation 3?

Shouldn't this effect Nintendo and Microsoft too?

They also have rumbling features.

[Michael Grogan]

This won't hurt Sony...

...they can easily make up the cost through the bloated PSP profits they're poised to receive.

I agree in part and disagree in part.

First, I agree that it's probably not going to hurt Sony. I'm not terribly familiar with the documents in this case, but even if the order is upheld, I don't think it's going to slow them down too much. From what I gather, all they really have to do is continue to pay licensing costs and get official licensing agreements. Not terribly hard.

However, I disagree with your viewpoint on the PSP's price. Perhaps you and I define "bloated" differently, but I personally feel $249.99 is fair market value for a system that can do more than simply play games (whether it does these things well or not is a matter of individual opinion, of course).

Are there shortcomings to the PSP? Of course there are, but for everything it can do, Sony could have inflated the price to $400.00 (which, a few months back, just before the release of the PSP in Japan, most gaming stores were speculating a price point of $400) and still sold them hand-over-fist. Then I would have complained that the price was inflated. $250 just seems fair to me.

The 47 Games

I found a copy of the ruling but I have found no mention of which games Immersion wanted an injunction against. I can't seem to find any filings through FindLaw or the Northern California District Court.

That said, the article eludes to games that are not published by Sony as being included. I do not think games that are not published by Sony should be included in this as they were only developing for what was included with the PS1/PS2 and were not actively attempting to infringe Immersion's patents. Blocking games manufactured or published by Sony I could understand, but not third-party games.

[System Tyrant]

SCO in point

Look at SCO. They are suing people for using Linux. As far as I know most of them didn't modify Linux, but SCO can still sue them. Same goes for people who make games I guess. It doesn't matter that they may not have know about the infringment they still took part in it.

Right or wrong I couldn't tell you, but in my opinion it's cow dookie.

Here ya go

The games are: "A Bug's Life," "Amplitude," "Ape Escape," "Atlantis: The Lost Empire," "Bloody Roar 2," "Cool Boarders 3," "Cool Boarders 2001," "Crash Bash," "Crash Team Racing," "Drakan," "Emperor's New Groove," "Extermination," "FantaVision," "Final Fantasy X," "Formula One 2001," "The Getaway," "Gran Turismo(s) 1, 2 & 3," "GTA: Vice City," GTA 3," "Grind Session," "Ico," "Jak & Daxter," "Kinetica," "Kingdom Hearts," "Legend of the Dragoon," "The Mark of Kri," "Medal of Honor Frontline," "Medievil 2," "Metal Gear Solid 2," "Monsters Inc.," "Sly Cooper," "SOCOM Navy Seals," "Speed Punks," Spyro," "Stuart Little 2," "Syphon Filter 2 & 3," "THPS 3," "Twisted Metal: Black," "Twisted Metal 4," "Twisted Metal: Small Brawl," "Treasure Planet," "War of the Monsters."


David Becker, CNET News.com

[PCCRomeo]

Copyrights...

...Why do companies copyright such features and then never use them? I mean, the "rumble" feature I'm sure is of more use to Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo than Immerson.

Immersion does use them.

They have some desktop software that use the force feedback feature. It's kind of lame, but they do have it.

Oh, and it's a *patent*! You can't copyright an invention!