Comments on: Adobe eyes fraud-busting tools for Photoshop
If Adobe goes through with its plans, finding photo fraud will be far simpler.
If Adobe goes through with its plans, finding photo fraud will be far simpler.
January 4, 2010 4:00 AM PST
January 4, 2010 4:00 AM PST
January 4, 2010 4:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I give it about 24 hours. Perhaps 48.
/P
The software examines the pixels. Each camera produces
noise, and the pattern of that noise, in addition to depending how
it was compressed, will vary between different brands.
After all, the EXIF is maintained, even though the photo
can be manipulated. So, manipulation is only detected by
looking at the actual image.
version, I doubt this "detection" will work if someone with enough
experience does the editing. There's ways to get around this. If a
photo is "edited" without using the cloning tool the technique won't
work, will it? Printing an "edited" photo out and then rescanning
(with a filter?) may be another way. And those two ideas are just
off the top of my head.
Now Adobe slips into the uniform of CSIs
- can be used as a tool to help make fraud harder to detect.
- by ralfthedog March 19, 2007 7:04 AM PDT
- First, keep editing your photo until everything but the quantization tables checks as legit. Then save using a plugin that uses Canon quantization tables.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(7 Comments)You would need to use original photos, or stock shots taken in raw mode. Double compression would be detectable. The only truly hard part would be writing the canon plugin.