Comments on: Trial software trying PC users' patience
More and more PC real estate is up for sale to application vendors, and that can mean a slower box for consumers.
More and more PC real estate is up for sale to application vendors, and that can mean a slower box for consumers.
January 3, 2010 9:30 PM PST
January 3, 2010 4:40 PM PST
January 3, 2010 3:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
adware, spyware, and various other things
installed by vendors too. The solution? Buy the
computer without an OS pre-installed, and
install the operating-system(s) and
application(s) you want yourself.
OS and application installation can be time
consuming (particularly Windows, ugh!), but it's
otherwise straight-forward. And the benefit is
you get a lean system with just the bits you
want there.
adware, spyware, and various other things
installed by vendors too. The solution? Buy the
computer without an OS pre-installed, and
install the operating-system(s) and
application(s) you want yourself.
OS and application installation can be time
consuming (particularly Windows, ugh!), but it's
otherwise straight-forward. And the benefit is
you get a lean system with just the bits you
want there.
And people wonder why Macs cost less than PCs.
And people wonder why Macs cost less than PCs.
I find it amazing how many companies feel that it is perfectly all right to high-jack some one elses computer and property.
What's next bumper stickers for companies on the rear of your new car?
Robert
Heck you seem to forget that some people are selling their BODY SPACE for tattoos advertising casinos and whatnot!
lol
I find it amazing how many companies feel that it is perfectly all right to high-jack some one elses computer and property.
What's next bumper stickers for companies on the rear of your new car?
Robert
Heck you seem to forget that some people are selling their BODY SPACE for tattoos advertising casinos and whatnot!
lol
The vendors shouldn't pre-install any extra software, instead they should provide an interview process where the user can run down a checklist of software that's available for installation and decide whether they want to install it or not. Once the user has made their choices then the software they chose could be installed and all the install packages removed to save the user's disk space.
Of course that's exactly what those vendors *don't* want.
The article also neglected to mention the other extremely bad habit of certain vendors, the "pre-load" our software background application (no thanks to MS who invented this bad idea). It seems the media players are the worst offenders, Quicktime and RealPlayer both have huge background applications that save you a half second of load time for viewing a video at the cost of many additional seconds of system boot time. Frankly I end up booting my systems a lot more often than I play a Quicktime or Realplayer file and you can bet I don't use either of those piggish and awkward applications to play videos, they both stink (in different ways). (For you iIdiots out there, Quicktime stinks because Apple tries to make it's application work like a Mac application instead of conforming to the standard Windows interface and conventions, that's every bit as wrong as if MS were to make MS Office for the Mac look and work like a Windows application).
The vendors shouldn't pre-install any extra software, instead they should provide an interview process where the user can run down a checklist of software that's available for installation and decide whether they want to install it or not. Once the user has made their choices then the software they chose could be installed and all the install packages removed to save the user's disk space.
Of course that's exactly what those vendors *don't* want.
The article also neglected to mention the other extremely bad habit of certain vendors, the "pre-load" our software background application (no thanks to MS who invented this bad idea). It seems the media players are the worst offenders, Quicktime and RealPlayer both have huge background applications that save you a half second of load time for viewing a video at the cost of many additional seconds of system boot time. Frankly I end up booting my systems a lot more often than I play a Quicktime or Realplayer file and you can bet I don't use either of those piggish and awkward applications to play videos, they both stink (in different ways). (For you iIdiots out there, Quicktime stinks because Apple tries to make it's application work like a Mac application instead of conforming to the standard Windows interface and conventions, that's every bit as wrong as if MS were to make MS Office for the Mac look and work like a Windows application).
The only drawback to this approach is that every PC carries a boatload of crapware installed at the factory. I spend an hour per machine just uninstalling the garbage, including the 30- or 60-day trial packages, to free up RAM and disk space. This also speeds up the machine by jettisoning the associated "drag anchors" that load at startup.
I know of very few people who actually _use_ any of the extraneous software. In the end, computer vendors are only wasting their money and time to install this junk on the machines.
The only drawback to this approach is that every PC carries a boatload of crapware installed at the factory. I spend an hour per machine just uninstalling the garbage, including the 30- or 60-day trial packages, to free up RAM and disk space. This also speeds up the machine by jettisoning the associated "drag anchors" that load at startup.
I know of very few people who actually _use_ any of the extraneous software. In the end, computer vendors are only wasting their money and time to install this junk on the machines.
I had the machine up and running within 10 minutes of getting the delivery. However, it took another 90 minutes to get all the garbage uninstalled.
One of the biggest offenders was Symantec. That bloated piece of cr@p had like 5 different auto-load applications, and all these "layers" to prevent you from removing it. I swear, it was worse than any virus I've ever seen. And totally useless also. A simple 50k Zone Alarm file and common sense makes it redundant.
If Dell truly does need to peddle this junk, at least they should make it easy for the consumer to wipe it.
I had the machine up and running within 10 minutes of getting the delivery. However, it took another 90 minutes to get all the garbage uninstalled.
One of the biggest offenders was Symantec. That bloated piece of cr@p had like 5 different auto-load applications, and all these "layers" to prevent you from removing it. I swear, it was worse than any virus I've ever seen. And totally useless also. A simple 50k Zone Alarm file and common sense makes it redundant.
If Dell truly does need to peddle this junk, at least they should make it easy for the consumer to wipe it.
Though i agree people need to make money, i still believe we need to have more of a choice on this. After all we're paying for a fast unbloated system, as i dont see anywhere in shops advertising some of the software pre-installed.
- Alienware, how it should be
- by d-R-k June 1, 2006 4:11 AM PDT
- I nearly fainted when i saw my Sentia's Desktop. I was used to having lots of unwanted software pre-installed with my previous vendors.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 3 pages (156 Comments)Though i agree people need to make money, i still believe we need to have more of a choice on this. After all we're paying for a fast unbloated system, as i dont see anywhere in shops advertising some of the software pre-installed.