Comments on: Five reasons not to fear a $200 Linux PC
A rash of supremely affordable PCs preloaded with Linux has hit mainstream retail stores. And trying one is not as risky a proposition as you might think.
Most Popular
Latest tech news headlines
- Google makes its home page a Chrome page
December 27, 2009 7:40 AM PST
- Police to put drunk drivers' names on Twitter
December 26, 2009 2:17 PM PST
- Kindle is most gifted Amazon item, ever
December 26, 2009 11:19 AM PST
- See all headlines
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
- Markets
Related quotes
* Dell and Lenovo stock their Linux offerings in areas where you have to go looking for them, and not on all models.
So, pretty much, the average consumer is still stuck with having Vista jammed in their faces everywhere they turn.
/P
That's why this news IS news, because they are starting to appear AND that they are sold out indicates that addoption MAY start to happen.
I don't know how you can equate "sold (out) at wal-mart and sears" with generaly available. Make an effort, think, and you'll see that those two sentences are not equivalent.
Never has.
At any price.
Neither does any of the computer stores, for over 200 miles in all directions.
Remember when WordPerfect was the king of the hill in word processing? Remember how MS Word took over the throne? They implemented a series of helper functions to assist those who were hopelessly addicted to WordPerfect migrate to Word. Help functions, pop up hints, even menu structures, were mimicked as close as legal to WordPerfect so it would make it easier to migrate. And it worked.
Like it or not, Linux is going to have to do the same thing if it wants to win over the mainstream user. The desktops will have to be very similar to Windows and the applications will have to be as well. It's not going to happen overnight and it's not even happening yet. The person who wrote this article would better serve the mainstream readers if they would stop being a fangirl and start being a realist.
* I can update all of my apps on Linux (along with the OS) in one go, as opposed to only getting Windows Update for the OS alone. That makes Linux easier to maintain.
* In regards to "[i]The desktops will have to be very similar to Windows and the applications will have to be as well."[/i]? That's not true at all. Otherwise, perhaps you can explain why Apple OSX is growing so explosively?
* KDE and GNOME (whichever is chosen by default) already have the look and smell of a typical PC layout in organization and menu items.
PS - Word took over from WP for two reasons: Corel screwed up a bit when it bought WP, and MSFT went out of their way to subtly break WordPerfect functionality in Windows.
/P
It also needs a solid GUI, Gnome and KDE have been "under development" for far too long. Clean it up!
Best, optimize for a specific set of hardware.
Linux is /too/ flexible for most people to deal with.
What I wouldn't give to get reveal codes back.
Cheers.
This is a silly stupid story without a point.
So why not pay $50 more and get something w/ Vista on it? Because odds are very good that that $250 Vista box will barely run itself, let alone anything else.
Flash and QT? No problem - I get those right now on the Linux box I'm typing this on. Windows Media files are worse than worthless on the Internet, unless you're downloading bootleg porn or other pirated media... that said, VLC (which comes standard with most Linux distros) runs even those files just fine, as long as there's no DRM latched onto them.
/P
Who is not doing the research here?
computer boxes about once every two years, but I only upgrade
monitors once every five or so AND I keep the old ones going as
second monitors.
Also, new monitors can be had for $50, if you know where to look.
Plus $40 every year there after for Antivirus upgrades.
Plus $400 Office suite
Plus Office suite upgrades every now and then
Plus $60 every year for computer Tune ups
Plus...
etc.
I'm sure you can add, so keep adding.
The last software package I bought was PaintShopPro 10. There is NO exciting software left.
It's almost refreshing, since I save a lot of money by not buying software and I don't pirate either. Software is dead.
Cheers.
Linux still isn't entirely people friendly and fails to deliver a user friendly experience. I think Linux is worthless on a regular persons desktop machine. They might think they can go out and buy some software and install it, or buy a video game and play it, only to find out that nothing like that works with Linux. It can be a pain getting drivers and codecs to work properly. And no offense, but a lot of the programs written in the open source community are half assed and need to be better designed. They're just terrible to use compared to professional products. There are a few exceptions to this, but for the most part I don't care for open source that much. I'm glad it exists, but I don't want it on my machine and I don't think it's in the best interest of other people either.
Further, I use Ubuntu, and it's more user friendly by far than windows is. We'll be catching up quickly. By the way, I'm out there on ideapool, ideastorm, filing bug reports and feature requests, while you sit on your butt. Thanks for taking advantage of BSD while contributing, uh, nothing, to real progress.
Cheers.
There are a few exceptions to this, but for the most part I don't care for open source that much. I'm glad it exists, but I don't want it on my machine and I don't think it's in the best interest of other people either.
end quote >
Well if that's truly the case then I would suggest you uninstall the tcp/ip stack in your mac. That is open source software.
Anyone can download it and install it on their PC. It is based on Ubuntu, and has been modified by Linspire to be more user friendly than Ubuntu Linux already is, and it has abilities to use many Microsoft file formats with Linux software that uses the same file formats as Microsoft software for Windows does.
Freespire is a free version of Linspire, Linspire has all the codecs, drivers, etc already built into it, but offers them for $50 for a CD-ROM with them already built in.
I'm getting really annoyed by these "journalists" on CNET that post random numbers. How do you even get paid to post this???
And if you don't want to do it alone:
ethana2@gmail.com
--free support by email; redistributable, unlimited offer.
Then I got a Windows PC (about 7 years ago), partly due to cost/performance, Apple's market position at the time, to play more games (which I actually never really did much - just more of the same old games, which also happen to be available on the Mac and sometimes even Linux). And my creativity plummeted. Now I'm far more of a consumer of content than a creator.
Recently I installed Linux on an old PC to use for a class (actually the same PC I first got for Windows...) and IMMEDIATELY felt like I might use it for the creative things I haven't been doing for years. The same old feeling was back!
It's hard to lay a finger on it exactly, but I really think there's something pathologically wrong with Windows that turns its users into zombies, relative to using other systems.
I also found the current Gnome interface (will try KDE later too) and installation of new programs to be very easy - so much so that I doubt any newbie would find it more difficult than Windows (in fact, in many cases likely much less so), and I believe it has more than enough good-quality applications readily available for virtually any common consumer use (gaming being the sole exception).
Why would most people need MS Word for instance? That has got to be the most confusing and infuriating excuse for a word processor I've ever encountered. New users, and even experienced ones, struggle mightily in fighting against the computer to get Word to do what they want. (And if you need more powerful features than a basic WP program provides, you're probably better off with a page layout program like InDesign or FrameMaker anyway.)
If a good selection of such commonly-used programs were pre-installed and the system were smartly set up and pre-configured, I expect such a PC could easily provide a happy and comfortable home computing experience for the vast majority of people - again, likely happier and more comfortable (not to mention cheaper) than they're getting from Windows.
(I think a Mac would be a better option still, but that is definitely NOT inexpensive.)
I think that in general, a good Linux PC (which can play a small selection of fun games, plus many on the web) + game console is a better option (granted that consoles don't specialize in the same types of games as PCs). Or if the household has more than one PC, there could be a Windows gaming PC (for the son, for instance), and a Linux computer for ordinary use (say, for the parents).
Besides, if anyone is savvy enough to find a pirated copy of Windows, format the drive, and install it, they probably have the knowledge to create a partition for Windows, and have both at their disposal.
used that shorthand way to describe OpenOffice.
However, OpenOffice is not a Microsoft Office "equivalent".
It is superior.
And it is free.
Microsoft's worst nightmare.
Well, maybe Ubuntu is their WORST nightmare...
I disagree with the tone that seems to imply that Linux "Is OK for lesser things".
Linux when preinstalled and when using the appropriate hardware can be as functional as other OSs. Of course not all OSs are the same so some will be better at some things some will be better at others, but that's true with anything. There is always a tradeoff.
Not even close.
Even if you did, a web browser or even solitaire would take 5 minutes to load since Vista is a memory hog.
Comedy Central my friend!
My machine at home has no chance of running vista. I do have
xp running on it for gaming - yes, winblows has more games -
and Ubuntu for real work (usually;)). Guess what. Ubuntu boots
faster, loads and runs programs faster, even shuts down faster
than xp. Everything works, even the wireless ethernet. Installing
it took less than an hour. I upgraded it from 0704 to 0710 the
other night while I was playing Mahjong. Try upgrading from xp
to vista while playing a game on it! Better yet, try backing up an
entire winblows system while it's running with a one line
command.
I wouldn't refer to it as a "free lunch". Lots of people have
volunteered tons of code to the cause. It's just that they did it
for the betterment of society, instead of doing it for the
enrichment of Gates.
/P
Cheers.
On the other hand, paying for the OS does not add value, when you're talking about Windows vs Linux today (After 8 years of using Windows 98 SP2, then XP, on my home PC, I plan on moving away from Windows now that I have a Linux PC running, and Vista will certainly never exist in my home). 5 years ago I would have agreed that, for inexperienced home users, there was added value to Windows compared to the Linux distros of the time, but no longer.
Vista on a $199 PC? That only creates value as a boat anchor.
And you are right, there are no free lunches (except maybe at a soup kitchen). However, a sub $200 computer running Linux is like a quick and nutritious meal, while a $500+ Vista ready PC is like a greasy lump-o-lard.
Linux aint the be all and end all of computing, but for most users, it'll do the job nicely thanks very much.
Of course, most of them are worthless, but that is not an OS specific issue.
Of course, if you're a mom with kids who wants a PC for the kids to do their homework on, or you are an adult who wants to write letters and to user the internet, this isn't a cut corner at all.
Firefox offers an identical web browsing experience on Linux as it does as Windows.
Joe blow goes into walmart, buys a $200 Linux based PC then walk 2 rows over to look as loads of Windows software, and maybe some Mac software he can run on his new PC.
Maybe its just Linux users coming in to get a great deal?
Oh, no wait! you are smarter than "those other" Wal-mart people. right?
Maybe they will see the loads of free Open source quite fine applications already included in their package manager. Maybe, just maybe.
if not a simple download (& automatically install) with your package manager.
So no need to look for software there....
What software do you see for sale at any store especially Walmart. (don't think I've ever seen Mac software)
Other than few retail copies of Windows & Office, and this time of year tax software, the majority is Anti-virus, Anti-Spyware, Anti-software etc..... maybe games, but selection is larger for the settop boxes PS2/3, Wii, Xbox...
Anyway while there might not be every little thing (yet)
all of what most people need/want is already there.
Browsers, Mail, News/IRC, etc.
Mediaplayers
Productivity, Office apps,
Games, edutaiment
Imagining tools,
etc, etc
But I somewhat agree with your last statement as Linux users and those others aware & interested would be the first to understand the value.
A person who takes it home will naturally go to "Add and Remove Software", poke around, and discover that there's a shedload of apps that likely do almost all of what they need... free for the download.
The scenario you described sounds plausible, yes... but the software can simply get returned unopened (it isn't that tough to boot the machine and realize that - waitaminute - this isn't Windows :) ).
/P
1. Create documents (word, spreadsheet etc)
2. Send/receive emails
3. Web browsing
4. Play Games
5. Upload and manipulate photos sometime
6. Instant Messaging
All LINUX based distributions provide these things, possibly not very well on the Games front yet. Therefore I think your article is not giving the reader the correct impression as to buying a PC with LINUX OS.
Just thought you should know ....
I wonder why I, so average in every other way, have managed to excel so prodigiously in the use of such an advanced piece of technology. Did my mother read COBOL manuals aloud when I was in the womb? No, there are no old COBOL manuals in my parents attic. Perhaps it is the long line of engineers, Ph.D's, and inventors whose DNA I've inherited. No, that's not it. Nothing but blue collar workers in my family tree. I have it! I should have realized it sooner, forest through the trees and all that I suppose...The reason is obvious, I am a frigging genius!
Okay you caught me. I'm not actually a genius. I do however now how to ask questions. Simple questions like "Why doesn't this work?" "Is there a program that does this?" "Where can I find more information on this subject?" And I can follow directions. I believe the process is generally referred to as learning. Now don't quote me on this, I have no numbers to back it up, but most people can develop this rarest of skills.
Joe and Jane Blow average computer user can ask questions too. And given the nature of most linux communities the people there will be happy to answer them. But don't worry the people who answer their questions will use really small words and type really slow. That way Joe and Jane won't get confused and their little pea brains won't become overly taxed. And who knows, they might even learn how their computer works in addition to actually using it. Imagine that a computer user that understands how their computer works.
The average computer user is capable of learning how to use linux. And every well known distribution of linux is capable of doing what ever they need it to do. KDE is very windows like and most of the applications not only work they work well. And all of them are free so if they don't like what comes with their distro they can find one they prefer.
And to all of you who think linux apps aren't ready for prime time I say this. Microsoft has gotten where it is today with applications that are "good enough". And it hasn't changed. How long did it take MS to upgrade IE from v6 to v7? Why? Because until firefox came along IE v6 was good enough. MS releases a new operating system and within 9 months there's a service pack. Why? Because it was good enough to release. Can you imagine if you bought a TV and every time you went from channel 27 to 52 it shut off. What would you do if the manufacturer told you that that problem would be fixed with the next SP?
Sorry, I didn't want to bash MS. If you're happy with Microsoft and it's products then by all means I wish you happy computing. I might even suggest for the adventurous among you to download a live cd and try it.
Why all the Linux vs Windows stuff. I'll just use whatever OS I want, and you can use whatever OS you want. If someone has a problem with my OS I'll just hit em in the eye or something because it's just a stupid argument.
If Linux people want Windows to switch just keep working on the pretty eye candy stuff because that's what the average user really cares about. Movie's, games, audio, email, web, and pretty colors.
- OpenOffice = FREE Microsoft Office
- by punlman January 25, 2008 2:16 PM PST
- Yes. OpenOffice is the free, open source, version of Microsoft
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Insulting.
- by ralfthedog January 25, 2008 7:16 PM PST
- Microsoft Office is an office package with a word processor, spreadsheet program and such. Open Office is also a office package with a word processor, spreadsheet and such. Please don't say that the excellent Open Office package is the same as the junk that Microsoft makes.
- Like this View reply
Processing -
Showing 1 of 2 pages (134 Comments)Office.
It runs on Windows. It runs on Mac. And it's built-in to Ubuntu,
of course.
Download it free and try it, at OppenOffice . Org
Ubuntu is the best.
Windows & Mac will very soon be history.