Version: 2008

Comments on: Sex workers call for boycott of 'Grand Theft Auto'

Organization cries foul over players accruing points "for the depiction of rape and murder of prostitutes."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (56 Comments)
Does society still think that video games are for children?
by dewalt25 February 16, 2006 9:19 AM PST
Does society still think that video games are for children? It seems like the game was rated to be Mature 17+, which I believe is the same rating as Rated R for movies.

Bottom line - blame the parents and the stores.
Reply to this comment
Does society still think that video games are for children?
by dewalt25 February 16, 2006 9:19 AM PST
Does society still think that video games are for children? It seems like the game was rated to be Mature 17+, which I believe is the same rating as Rated R for movies.

Bottom line - blame the parents and the stores.
Reply to this comment
Morality Lessons from Prostitutes?
by kelmon February 16, 2006 9:27 AM PST
I'd just like to say that while I generally deplore games like GTA
for the messages that they send ("hey, kicking the crap out of
someone gives money..."), it comes to something when we are
being given lessons on morality by prostitutes. Sure, I don't
think games like GTA are good for anyone (not least because I
found them boring as hell and pretty frustrating, although I
openly admit to being rubbish at most games), but then I don't
think that selling your body is a great idea either, so maybe
people in glass houses shouldn't start hurling bricks, huh?

Starting from an indefensible position kinda makes it difficult to
be taken seriously on any issues.
Reply to this comment
Industry stretches hand to parents.
by zaznet February 18, 2006 2:56 AM PST
It's a little worse than just making news about it, they are reaching for parents. Like many parents are going to want the sex industry telling them what is good for their children.

They are only against GTA to get positive publicity out of a game that gives a well deserved negative view towards their industry.
Morality Lessons from Prostitutes?
by kelmon February 16, 2006 9:27 AM PST
I'd just like to say that while I generally deplore games like GTA
for the messages that they send ("hey, kicking the crap out of
someone gives money..."), it comes to something when we are
being given lessons on morality by prostitutes. Sure, I don't
think games like GTA are good for anyone (not least because I
found them boring as hell and pretty frustrating, although I
openly admit to being rubbish at most games), but then I don't
think that selling your body is a great idea either, so maybe
people in glass houses shouldn't start hurling bricks, huh?

Starting from an indefensible position kinda makes it difficult to
be taken seriously on any issues.
Reply to this comment
Industry stretches hand to parents.
by zaznet February 18, 2006 2:56 AM PST
It's a little worse than just making news about it, they are reaching for parents. Like many parents are going to want the sex industry telling them what is good for their children.

They are only against GTA to get positive publicity out of a game that gives a well deserved negative view towards their industry.
Oh Boy
by CBWolf February 16, 2006 9:30 AM PST
You know, I don't even own a PS2, but in light of this article I
feel like going out and buying a few copies of Grand Theft Auto:
San Andreas. I bet they would make great coasters.

"We are against all forms of censorship but . . . " but not this
one? Why? There plenty of movies, books, and TV shows as
violent as Grand Theft Auto or more so. Why are video games
different? Why are they singled out time and time again? Because
we must protect the children? Look, I am not a child. None of my
friends are children, and most of us play video games. Children
are not the audience Take-Two is aiming at, we are. I think it is
a mediocre game so I have not bught it, but I despise the fact
that some people would like to take that option away from me.

Unlike SWOP, I actually do hate all censorship, not just the
censoring of things I approve of. If you're problem is that violent
and sexual video games are reaching children, what you should
be pushing for is better enforcement of the ESRB's rating system,
not trying to destroy the game altogether. There is a valid
audience for it, and we want to buy it.

We live in America, and it is my right as an adult in sound mind
to decapitate virtual prostitutes with a katana if I want to. That is
what free speech means.
Reply to this comment
Oh Boy
by CBWolf February 16, 2006 9:30 AM PST
You know, I don't even own a PS2, but in light of this article I
feel like going out and buying a few copies of Grand Theft Auto:
San Andreas. I bet they would make great coasters.

"We are against all forms of censorship but . . . " but not this
one? Why? There plenty of movies, books, and TV shows as
violent as Grand Theft Auto or more so. Why are video games
different? Why are they singled out time and time again? Because
we must protect the children? Look, I am not a child. None of my
friends are children, and most of us play video games. Children
are not the audience Take-Two is aiming at, we are. I think it is
a mediocre game so I have not bught it, but I despise the fact
that some people would like to take that option away from me.

Unlike SWOP, I actually do hate all censorship, not just the
censoring of things I approve of. If you're problem is that violent
and sexual video games are reaching children, what you should
be pushing for is better enforcement of the ESRB's rating system,
not trying to destroy the game altogether. There is a valid
audience for it, and we want to buy it.

We live in America, and it is my right as an adult in sound mind
to decapitate virtual prostitutes with a katana if I want to. That is
what free speech means.
Reply to this comment
children follow
by February 16, 2006 9:44 AM PST
First of all, boycotting a game designed for adults?

If you are against the content of the game don't purchase it. If
your child under 18 is playing this game and your appalled then
it's a failure of the parent in properly raising and prohibiting the
game from being played.

It is the up to the parent to choose whats safe for their children
to play. If the child is learning and reacting to the characters
and acting out, than thats a failure of the parents to teach their
children right from wrong, from reality to fantasy.

I wish parents would take control, and responsibility, instead of
pointing fingers and placing blame elsewhere, i also find
disturbing the amount of groups protesting this game.

Once you know the game is a game, it's fantasy not how one is
supposed to act in a civilized world, it's played for pleasure.

This game was designed for 20 something's not as a child's
game. Parents it's your job to protect your child, not the
governments, not pressure groups. stop trying to limit mature
people from the entertainment they seek out.
Reply to this comment
Bear in mind though
by City_Of_LA February 16, 2006 10:16 AM PST
Most parents are idiots to start with.
View reply
children follow
by February 16, 2006 9:44 AM PST
First of all, boycotting a game designed for adults?

If you are against the content of the game don't purchase it. If
your child under 18 is playing this game and your appalled then
it's a failure of the parent in properly raising and prohibiting the
game from being played.

It is the up to the parent to choose whats safe for their children
to play. If the child is learning and reacting to the characters
and acting out, than thats a failure of the parents to teach their
children right from wrong, from reality to fantasy.

I wish parents would take control, and responsibility, instead of
pointing fingers and placing blame elsewhere, i also find
disturbing the amount of groups protesting this game.

Once you know the game is a game, it's fantasy not how one is
supposed to act in a civilized world, it's played for pleasure.

This game was designed for 20 something's not as a child's
game. Parents it's your job to protect your child, not the
governments, not pressure groups. stop trying to limit mature
people from the entertainment they seek out.
Reply to this comment
Bear in mind though
by City_Of_LA February 16, 2006 10:16 AM PST
Most parents are idiots to start with.
View reply
Rape?
by February 16, 2006 10:17 AM PST
I don't recall being able to rape anyone in any of the GTA games. You can however beat up a hooker you just banged and get your money back. You can beat up anyone for money so it is equal opportunity beatings.
Reply to this comment
Oops, Should have read the entire story first.
by February 16, 2006 10:20 AM PST
.
Wow
by R. U. Sirius February 16, 2006 11:47 AM PST
>You can however beat up a hooker you just
>banged and get your money back. You can beat up
>anyone for money so it is equal opportunity
>beatings.

This must win some type of award for the strangest endorsement of a product. The more I hear about this game, the more it begins to sound like it should have been titled Sadists Playground or something.

Anyone remember Pacman?
View reply
Rape?
by February 16, 2006 10:17 AM PST
I don't recall being able to rape anyone in any of the GTA games. You can however beat up a hooker you just banged and get your money back. You can beat up anyone for money so it is equal opportunity beatings.
Reply to this comment
Oops, Should have read the entire story first.
by February 16, 2006 10:20 AM PST
.
Wow
by R. U. Sirius February 16, 2006 11:47 AM PST
>You can however beat up a hooker you just
>banged and get your money back. You can beat up
>anyone for money so it is equal opportunity
>beatings.

This must win some type of award for the strangest endorsement of a product. The more I hear about this game, the more it begins to sound like it should have been titled Sadists Playground or something.

Anyone remember Pacman?
View reply
SWOP Boycotts Jack the Ripper
by wysiwyg22 February 16, 2006 10:39 AM PST
For obvious reasons.
Reply to this comment
SWOP Boycotts Jack the Ripper
by wysiwyg22 February 16, 2006 10:39 AM PST
For obvious reasons.
Reply to this comment
Exactly
by inthenews February 16, 2006 1:18 PM PST
Some people should just not have kids period. Idiots just breed more idiots.
Reply to this comment
Exactly
by inthenews February 16, 2006 1:18 PM PST
Some people should just not have kids period. Idiots just breed more idiots.
Reply to this comment
The real question is
by City_Of_LA February 16, 2006 1:30 PM PST
Which one would you rather have your kids playing with? GTA or the prostitutes.

enough said.
Reply to this comment
The real question is
by City_Of_LA February 16, 2006 1:30 PM PST
Which one would you rather have your kids playing with? GTA or the prostitutes.

enough said.
Reply to this comment
This is not Take 2's fault
by techguy83 February 16, 2006 1:48 PM PST
Granted, the scenes that the mod unlocked should probably have not been in there. But, they were. The game had a rating for people 17 and up. So it is not their fault some idiot of a parent bouth their 9 yr old this game and now wants to sue on it.

Shame on all parents who do not do their jobs!!!
Reply to this comment
Read the article!
by zaznet February 18, 2006 3:02 AM PST
You seemed to assume they were talking about the unlockable content in the first edition game. This is about an organization asking parents to keep their children from a game based on objectionable content that was included by design and not the stuff that was hacked open later.
This is not Take 2's fault
by techguy83 February 16, 2006 1:48 PM PST
Granted, the scenes that the mod unlocked should probably have not been in there. But, they were. The game had a rating for people 17 and up. So it is not their fault some idiot of a parent bouth their 9 yr old this game and now wants to sue on it.

Shame on all parents who do not do their jobs!!!
Reply to this comment
Read the article!
by zaznet February 18, 2006 3:02 AM PST
You seemed to assume they were talking about the unlockable content in the first edition game. This is about an organization asking parents to keep their children from a game based on objectionable content that was included by design and not the stuff that was hacked open later.
Definatly not take 2s responsibility or fault.
by Nifferson February 16, 2006 2:47 PM PST
While the GTA series is pretty violent and very graphic, its the parents responsibility to educate their children on things like this and not the companies... and you can't ban things just because someone is offended... I'm offended by the way you look, but I can't ban that can I? a little extreme of an example I guess but I hope you get the point. I don't believe in outlawing or banning most things. Educating people to the point of being able to properly deal with every day (at least today it is) instances is the parents responsibility. If you like you can educate them according to the ideals that you hold, in fact, if you do a good enough job of that, you wouldn't even have to talk to them specifically about things like GTA. People are always looking for that scapegoat.
Reply to this comment
lesson for parents to teach their kids
by mortis9 February 16, 2006 3:55 PM PST
how about this: instead of suing after the fact because your kid is playing a violent video game, you take up the role of parent and explain that this is just a game (most kids already realize this). Perhaps you might also point out that the video game companies do far less harm than companies like GAP (who exploit child labor) and Exxon-Mobil (who exploit third world countries and governments, aiding in destabilization of whole regions) and companies like Oracle (who don't blink twice after firing 50,000 employees because buying up the competition is good everyone (???)).

Parent's should need a license and guidebook... my two cents.
Definatly not take 2s responsibility or fault.
by Nifferson February 16, 2006 2:47 PM PST
While the GTA series is pretty violent and very graphic, its the parents responsibility to educate their children on things like this and not the companies... and you can't ban things just because someone is offended... I'm offended by the way you look, but I can't ban that can I? a little extreme of an example I guess but I hope you get the point. I don't believe in outlawing or banning most things. Educating people to the point of being able to properly deal with every day (at least today it is) instances is the parents responsibility. If you like you can educate them according to the ideals that you hold, in fact, if you do a good enough job of that, you wouldn't even have to talk to them specifically about things like GTA. People are always looking for that scapegoat.
Reply to this comment
lesson for parents to teach their kids
by mortis9 February 16, 2006 3:55 PM PST
how about this: instead of suing after the fact because your kid is playing a violent video game, you take up the role of parent and explain that this is just a game (most kids already realize this). Perhaps you might also point out that the video game companies do far less harm than companies like GAP (who exploit child labor) and Exxon-Mobil (who exploit third world countries and governments, aiding in destabilization of whole regions) and companies like Oracle (who don't blink twice after firing 50,000 employees because buying up the competition is good everyone (???)).

Parent's should need a license and guidebook... my two cents.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (56 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement