Comments on: Photos: PlayStation 3 unmasked
It's sleek, speedy and comes in three colors. But how does Sony's new console compare with the Xbox 360?![]()
It's sleek, speedy and comes in three colors. But how does Sony's new console compare with the Xbox 360?![]()
December 4, 2009 4:56 PM PST
December 4, 2009 4:25 PM PST
December 4, 2009 4:14 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Next would be the controllers. X360 has four and PS3 has 7. People are awed by that very statement and conclude that the 360 sucks. I want you to consider this: You all know how it is to split-screen with 4 players. It sucks, unless you have a gigantic television, in which you don't care because you'll be getting both systems. Now that you have four in your mind, try putting in 7. That is probably the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Split-screening with 7 people...unless they make some kind of device that lets you put the extra controllers on another TV. Which just takes away from the statement of their being no multi-tap.
and lastly...will there is nothing else...internet connectivity for PS2? Xbox Live will beat the living s*** out of it. That tiny little movie player they're calling the PSP? I haven't seen any good games and that's a big thing just for music(go with iPod). The only thing I've honestly been happy for about the PSP is t plays movies and it is smallER than the rest of the things out there...'m not sure bout iPod vid though..boomerang? imagine your hand on the triggers playing with your wrists at that angle? You'll cramp up after an hour of playing SOCOM. And if you're excited about all the other promises the Sony Company has made just take a look at the PS2 launch headlines...they've made the same promises before...
You don't have an Xbox 360, therefore you have no opinionPERIOD>
As far as the PS3 goes, yes the design is horrible, but probably still a "design". But still a better point..... again you obviously don't have it and therefor you have no opinion.
Did you just post to fire people up? Here is a "load of garbage" for you. Game sales in 2005 are 3x movie and music sales COMBINED. THIS IS A 50 BILLION DOLLAR A YEAR INDUSTRY AND EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING AS I POST THIS.
If these systems are crappy, then what is the benchmark? You have no merit w/ your comments.... you just wasted my time.... and everyone else who even glanced at this posts' time.
Ignorance is never the solution
IT SUCKS SO BAD THAT I COULD HERE FROM A THOUSAND MILES AWAY, and I'll tell you why it sucks. One reason is it claims to have better graphics""<< well it does'nt because every game that i played on PS2 and Xbox that is the same they both have the same graphics. One other thing is that when the PS3 hits the streets, Xbox 360 is gonna cry like a little baby because it gonna blow Xbox away by how much more games it will be out with and this time its gonna have way better graphics. There i layed everything and i dont care what people think just know the truth.PEACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- ps2 ps3
- by lingy2 June 9, 2007 4:31 AM PDT
- the ps2 sold every single console thy had in the frist couple of day xbox didnt the reason ps3 didnt sell all of them in the frist couple of day was bcos sony gave us alot more than thy gave us the ps2 we sold twice as many as xbox 360 and it a proven fact so f**k yu
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 3 pages (176 Comments)