Comments on: More states target violent games
Washington State bill would hold firms responsible for inspiring real-life violence; Arkansas proposal keeps M-rated games out of kids' reach.
Washington State bill would hold firms responsible for inspiring real-life violence; Arkansas proposal keeps M-rated games out of kids' reach.
November 29, 2009 9:02 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:54 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
So it is OK to kill white men? Of course, they are forgetting, that no one gets killed in video games.
We don't need more legislation. We need more responsible parents, and lawmakers need to stay out of areas that they have no clue about.
Though, I still firmly believe that any parents that bought the "offending game" should automatically have their case thrown out and be required to pay all court costs for being stupid.
Parents who bought the game for their kids are idiots if they turn around and sue. The ESRB is the best rating system even considered better than the MPAA's rating system so if the parent is too lazy to check the back of the box but is willing to go out of their way to sue game developers and distrubutors then that is really really appauling that they should be sued and put in jail because we don't want crazy people running around are streets do we?
My little brother likes playing M rated games to...but he doesn't play them all the time if at all...he thinks "kingdom of hearts" is more fun. Seeing this behavior proves to me that some people are born more prone to violent acts then others, and although the environment they are born into affects them...it does not create their pre-disposition. Pollution, a bad gene pool, and living in a VIOLENT! world does that.
Their maybe a day when unborn children are put to death because they are likely to commit a violent act...They are already killed in some countries for having birth defects. That's what the future will be, and the people will appreciate it which is the sickest part!
Now on a test of a new law in Florida that makes you get carded when buying a M rated game,I,a 15 year old in 9th grade went to several stores and bought M Rated games in each,such as GTA SA,Halo 2,Devil May Cry 3,Manhunt,The Guy Game,and Leisure Suit Larry.Out of the 15 I went to I only had been HASSLED 1 and that was at K-Mart and even without a card I got it cause the manager was there and told the guy to just give it to me when I paid in cash without showing id.I understand 5 feet alittle you know when you were a kid you'd rent a movie or something just cause the cover looked cool but its kinda stupid if there gonna pick a violent cover and be able to do these violent actions at that age,they'd get lucky if they killed someone without dieing thereselves at that age(And if they were able to they would probally have enough sense to know not to pick up a machete and maim a few cops).I've played video games since I was 4 years old and the first game I played was Mortal Combat,the thing is I can talk to my baby sisters friend and they wont talk bout video games,hell if they even really know what it is,no they talk bout Power Rangers,some believe Power Rangers KILL the "bad" guys,now with all the corny "bad" guy plots whats to say Power Rangers isnt gonna have a 7 year old pick up a kitchen knife and kill his friend cause he wont share?I could go on but theres limited subject material to go on,let's get some pro censor video games people to post there opinons and arguments. =)
As sick as that may sound, it should be allowable. Penalizing game makers is not only ridiculous, it's illegal. Yes, "illegal". According to what? The Constitution. A little thing we call the First Amendment. Imposing penalties for game content is a violation of free speech.
But who cares, right? After all, this is America, home of the free*.
* Offer void where prohibited. Restrictions apply.