Comments on: How the XP-on-Mac prize was won
Colin Nederkoorn, the man behind the contest to get XP up and running on Intel Macs, talks about finding a winner.
Colin Nederkoorn, the man behind the contest to get XP up and running on Intel Macs, talks about finding a winner.
November 27, 2009 11:52 AM PST
November 27, 2009 10:30 AM PST
November 27, 2009 10:22 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
to the competition in general. It seems to have done a bang-up
job of delivering a solution and I hope that the coming weeks
and months will refine the process to making it as simple as
possible, assuming that it can be simplified anymore.
However, as has been noted in the article, the problem now is
one of drivers. I'm glad to hear that XP can be booted on an
Intel Mac but the lack of hardware video acceleration means that
it's far from the product that most people are hoping for. I'm
not certain where the drivers necessary to complete the process
are going to come from (I presume that the Linux community
has faced the same problem) but I'm hoping that these issues
will be resolved by the time that I buy my Intel Mac in about 6-
months.
I confess that I was beginning to have my doubts that this would
be done but I love being proven wrong in this.
machines. Yet here, 2 guys figure out how to modify Windows XP to
boot on Apple's EFI-based machine. It kind of makes you wonder
what kind of programmer's Microsoft has...
it just didn't. MS has had many opportunities to re-write old
code but decide not to for various reason. They have alot of
really bright people working there. Also, if you notice, When it
was reported that Vista wasn't going to run or EFI systems, they
said this of the 32 bit version. They also said that the 64 bit
version would.
I'm all for nocking Microsoft, but it needs to be for the right
reasons. Congrats to the two guys who accomplished this, but
realistically neither Apple nor Microsoft were actually attempting
this, nor did they say it was an impossible task.
"Never in the field of software development has so little been
produced by so many"
Apologies to Winston Churchill
whether or not there would even be an Intel version of Virtual
PC.
Now that there is a semi-simple way to run Windows on a Mac, I
think it would be motivation for MS to get going. People will
want to dual boot and they will be sitting with a shelved product
that could be making a lot of money by allowing people to run
Windows *inside* Mac OS X. They would make the money from
Virtual PC *and* the OS license.
I don't see them hesitating very much longer.
I'm more interested in a multi-os machine that doesn't sacrifice
speed and performance. The PC emulators came close, maybe now
that light in the tunnel isn't a train coming at me....
- Fast OS Switching...
- by NRU235 March 16, 2006 4:55 PM PST
- If Apple developed a more user-friendly way to switch between OS's, I would toss out my PC and buy a PowerMac. (When the new Conroe chipped PowerMac's are launched of course)
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Useless complaint.....
- by Earl Benser March 18, 2006 7:08 AM PST
- If you want XP in addition to OS X, buy a cheap PC, XP included,
- Like this
-
(13 Comments)I know from my experience in the protected streaming media business, that every MAC user is angery over not being able to play media protected by Windows DRM. The ability to switch OS's, on the fly, would alleviate this blockage.
and of course, I would still have Windows for my gaming needs.
and network it via VNC. Now you can run both machines from the
Mac easier than from a partitioned hard drive. I know, I run four
PC's at the moment, plus five Mac;s from my main G4, via ARD and
VNC. Works great! And no XP compromising my Mac's.