Version: 2008

Comments on: Sony Reader felled by the classics

It takes a long time to get into a good book, particularly if it's electronic.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
"Registration"
by mjm01010101 December 18, 2007 2:17 PM PST
"Registration
I can't recall how I actually registered the device, but it took about five minutes and somehow I got it accomplished."

There we go with that pesky "journalism" again.
Reply to this comment
"Registration"
by mjm01010101 December 18, 2007 2:17 PM PST
"Registration
I can't recall how I actually registered the device, but it took about five minutes and somehow I got it accomplished."

There we go with that pesky "journalism" again.
Reply to this comment
A *Sony* device to read books? Get serious
by zxcv1234zxcv December 18, 2007 2:27 PM PST
First, why would anyone buy anything from Sony? Not only have their products slid markedly in quality and their customer DISservice is amongst the worst, but the company that Sony hired to build the rootkit, SunnComm, wasn't qualified for that sort of work (they made false claims of working with other companies as well) though they were good Elvis impersonators. Really.

Go read up on Sony's actions:
http://substantialsimilarity.org/wp-content/uploads/subsim/2007/12/disaster-final.pdf

Second, why should I buy an unreliable and faulty Sony "reader" and pay $20 for books, when I can download the same books onto my PDA from Project Gutenberg for free, and then use my PDA for a myriad of other things besides reading?

The decision was a no-brainer...I mean Sony's decision was a no-brainer, mine was the smart choice.
Reply to this comment
ebook
by nrr333 December 19, 2007 6:19 AM PST
I would agree. I am half way through Crime and Punishment on my Palm 755p smartphone. The convenience is incredible.
Sony Reader Ignorance
by csmith75 December 19, 2007 12:06 PM PST
First, why would anyone comment about something that they know very little about? The Sony Reader is hardly an unreliable or faulty device. Also, those same books that are available for free on Project Gutenberg can also be transferred to the Sony Reader and read for FREE.

I've read ebooks on the small screen of a PDA for years and the experience of reading on the Sony Reader is much more pleasurable.
A *Sony* device to read books? Get serious
by zxcv1234zxcv December 18, 2007 2:27 PM PST
First, why would anyone buy anything from Sony? Not only have their products slid markedly in quality and their customer DISservice is amongst the worst, but the company that Sony hired to build the rootkit, SunnComm, wasn't qualified for that sort of work (they made false claims of working with other companies as well) though they were good Elvis impersonators. Really.

Go read up on Sony's actions:
http://substantialsimilarity.org/wp-content/uploads/subsim/2007/12/disaster-final.pdf

Second, why should I buy an unreliable and faulty Sony "reader" and pay $20 for books, when I can download the same books onto my PDA from Project Gutenberg for free, and then use my PDA for a myriad of other things besides reading?

The decision was a no-brainer...I mean Sony's decision was a no-brainer, mine was the smart choice.
Reply to this comment
ebook
by nrr333 December 19, 2007 6:19 AM PST
I would agree. I am half way through Crime and Punishment on my Palm 755p smartphone. The convenience is incredible.
Sony Reader Ignorance
by csmith75 December 19, 2007 12:06 PM PST
First, why would anyone comment about something that they know very little about? The Sony Reader is hardly an unreliable or faulty device. Also, those same books that are available for free on Project Gutenberg can also be transferred to the Sony Reader and read for FREE.

I've read ebooks on the small screen of a PDA for years and the experience of reading on the Sony Reader is much more pleasurable.
MP3's are not enough
by Grumpyz77 December 18, 2007 3:00 PM PST
MP3's are not enough for these devices to be a success. Now only if they could read the book back to me as well. Then I wouldn't have to have a book on CD and on in the reader. There is no reason they can't put the reading functionality in the device.
Reply to this comment
MP3's are not enough
by Grumpyz77 December 18, 2007 3:00 PM PST
MP3's are not enough for these devices to be a success. Now only if they could read the book back to me as well. Then I wouldn't have to have a book on CD and on in the reader. There is no reason they can't put the reading functionality in the device.
Reply to this comment
Have you tried any others?
by jimafrost December 18, 2007 3:33 PM PST
There's no nice way to put this: Sony's readers suck.

They're gorgeous, and the e-ink display is wonderful, but when it comes to actually using them they just ... suck. The e-ink display isn't fast enough for their UI, and rendering is horribly slow. Books are unbelievably expensive and there aren't very many of them. It supports exactly zero popular e-book formats.

I wanted to like Sony's book, I really did, but it is just not a good unit.

I've been watching the other players come (and usually go) and none of them had the right mix of price, capability, and document availability. Until a few weeks ago, that is, when Amazon released the Kindle.

Reviewers have panned the Kindle for all kinds of reasons -- the ergonomics seem almost senseless, the user interface is decidedly weird, and it's really expensive. But let me tell you first hand: It doesn't suck. At all. They lose against Sony in the looks and ergonomics department, but smash the ball out of the park when it comes to actually using the thing.

First and foremost Amazon has gone a long way towards fixing the book availability problem. They have almost five times as many titles as Sony, and their titles are much less expensive -- less expensive than paper. I want to see them expand their catalog a lot, but they do have a lot of current titles by major publishers that have been sorely lacking with other readers.

The Kindle's odd LCD-on-the-side UI is unusual but completely solves the interactivity problem e-ink displays have given their long repaint cycle. I hate click wheels with a passion but the interface is simple and it works.

Using a cellular network for data transfer is a stroke of genius. WiFi is faster, and it would surely make web browsing less painful (it's a lousy web browser, barely better than my phone), but WiFi is nowhere near as broadly available as Sprint's cell network. For downloading documents it works rather well, and having Amazon's store at your fingertips almost everywhere is really a nice feature. (And the lock-in is good for them, of course.)

What surprised me, though, was that the Kindle supports a couple of different e-book formats in which I already had titles. None of the DRMed titles are supported out-of-the-box, of course (although there are hacks for Mobipocket titles), but even without them about a third of the e-books I purchased for my PDA opened just fine. It doesn't do PDF, for which it is repeatedly knocked, but PDF is not a popular book format (at all, and for good reason). Still, the PDF-to-Mobipocket converter works ok on many documents so even here the Kindle is not really shut out.

I know I'm sounding like a salesman, and I'm sorry about that. In truth I recommend that most people wait for at least the next revision -- which should be much cheaper and fix a lot of the bugaboos in the current product. If you want a good electronic reader and you're relatively price-insensitive, though, the Kindle is a pretty nice little unit. Even if it is kind of ugly.
Reply to this comment
Sounds like a Kindle owner
by watsdamattau December 18, 2007 11:33 PM PST
Jimafrost, you sound like a Kindle owner trying to justify his purchase. The Sony PRS-505 supports quite a few formats including RTF, which, in my opinion is quite universal. Sony is working closely with Adobe so that their Digital Edition will work with the Reader. Not sure if that'll be offered on the Kindle.

If there's a formatted book you need converted to the Sony format then use libprs500.exe that you can download free from the website. I've been using libprs500 to convert books I've downloaded from sites and it works perfectly. I also use libprs500 to download Newsweek, BBC newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, and a few other newspapers for free. Oh, did I mention that it's FREE? How much did you need to pay for those subscriptions on your Kindle? On the Sony eBook site you can download feeds from Engadget and other websites...for free. Did I mention previously that I'm able to load FREE books and convert them for FREE and put them onto my PRS-505 without any hassles? With the Kindle you'll need to pay to have Amazon convert and email the book back to you.

So if the Kindle has all those books, how many of those 90,000 books are you actually going to buy and read? Granted the Sony site has 28,000 books available, but with Borders just about to join up I'm sure that'll change. Plus as I mentioned previously I can go to a website, download a book from, say, Gutenberg.org and throw it right into my Reader. Wireless is nice for the Kindle, but your battery life will suffer. 3 days of use with your Kindle is a far cry from over a week or two of use with the Sony Reader.

So overall, I think your assessment of the Sony is shortsighted and really sounds like you love your Kindle and are trying to justify spending $100 over the Sony Reader's $300 price.
Correction
by csmith75 December 19, 2007 12:24 PM PST
Books are unbelievably expensive for the Sony Reader? I just took a look at a couple of books on their bestsellers page and compared them to Amazon's books and most of the time they either matched their prices or were a dollar or two higher. Hardly, what I would call unbelievably expensive. I even took a look at the most expensive book (Get Rich, Stay Rich, Pass It On) on the front page and it was actually five dollars cheaper than the Kindle version.

I believe that Sony dropped the prices of their books along with other ebook stores like Fictionwise to compete with Amazon.

As far as formats, the Sony Reader supports TXT / RTF / PDF (unencrypted), along with Sony's proprietary format. These are popular formats as far as Project Gutenberg and other sites are concerned. Amazon chose not to support the popular Mobipocket format that other sites sell and which Amazon sold as well. Instead they created their own proprietary version and alienated all those people who had purchased Mobipocket books from Amazon.

I'm not saying the Sony Reader is perfect, but just trying to clear up some misinformation.
Have you tried any others?
by jimafrost December 18, 2007 3:33 PM PST
There's no nice way to put this: Sony's readers suck.

They're gorgeous, and the e-ink display is wonderful, but when it comes to actually using them they just ... suck. The e-ink display isn't fast enough for their UI, and rendering is horribly slow. Books are unbelievably expensive and there aren't very many of them. It supports exactly zero popular e-book formats.

I wanted to like Sony's book, I really did, but it is just not a good unit.

I've been watching the other players come (and usually go) and none of them had the right mix of price, capability, and document availability. Until a few weeks ago, that is, when Amazon released the Kindle.

Reviewers have panned the Kindle for all kinds of reasons -- the ergonomics seem almost senseless, the user interface is decidedly weird, and it's really expensive. But let me tell you first hand: It doesn't suck. At all. They lose against Sony in the looks and ergonomics department, but smash the ball out of the park when it comes to actually using the thing.

First and foremost Amazon has gone a long way towards fixing the book availability problem. They have almost five times as many titles as Sony, and their titles are much less expensive -- less expensive than paper. I want to see them expand their catalog a lot, but they do have a lot of current titles by major publishers that have been sorely lacking with other readers.

The Kindle's odd LCD-on-the-side UI is unusual but completely solves the interactivity problem e-ink displays have given their long repaint cycle. I hate click wheels with a passion but the interface is simple and it works.

Using a cellular network for data transfer is a stroke of genius. WiFi is faster, and it would surely make web browsing less painful (it's a lousy web browser, barely better than my phone), but WiFi is nowhere near as broadly available as Sprint's cell network. For downloading documents it works rather well, and having Amazon's store at your fingertips almost everywhere is really a nice feature. (And the lock-in is good for them, of course.)

What surprised me, though, was that the Kindle supports a couple of different e-book formats in which I already had titles. None of the DRMed titles are supported out-of-the-box, of course (although there are hacks for Mobipocket titles), but even without them about a third of the e-books I purchased for my PDA opened just fine. It doesn't do PDF, for which it is repeatedly knocked, but PDF is not a popular book format (at all, and for good reason). Still, the PDF-to-Mobipocket converter works ok on many documents so even here the Kindle is not really shut out.

I know I'm sounding like a salesman, and I'm sorry about that. In truth I recommend that most people wait for at least the next revision -- which should be much cheaper and fix a lot of the bugaboos in the current product. If you want a good electronic reader and you're relatively price-insensitive, though, the Kindle is a pretty nice little unit. Even if it is kind of ugly.
Reply to this comment
Sounds like a Kindle owner
by watsdamattau December 18, 2007 11:33 PM PST
Jimafrost, you sound like a Kindle owner trying to justify his purchase. The Sony PRS-505 supports quite a few formats including RTF, which, in my opinion is quite universal. Sony is working closely with Adobe so that their Digital Edition will work with the Reader. Not sure if that'll be offered on the Kindle.

If there's a formatted book you need converted to the Sony format then use libprs500.exe that you can download free from the website. I've been using libprs500 to convert books I've downloaded from sites and it works perfectly. I also use libprs500 to download Newsweek, BBC newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, and a few other newspapers for free. Oh, did I mention that it's FREE? How much did you need to pay for those subscriptions on your Kindle? On the Sony eBook site you can download feeds from Engadget and other websites...for free. Did I mention previously that I'm able to load FREE books and convert them for FREE and put them onto my PRS-505 without any hassles? With the Kindle you'll need to pay to have Amazon convert and email the book back to you.

So if the Kindle has all those books, how many of those 90,000 books are you actually going to buy and read? Granted the Sony site has 28,000 books available, but with Borders just about to join up I'm sure that'll change. Plus as I mentioned previously I can go to a website, download a book from, say, Gutenberg.org and throw it right into my Reader. Wireless is nice for the Kindle, but your battery life will suffer. 3 days of use with your Kindle is a far cry from over a week or two of use with the Sony Reader.

So overall, I think your assessment of the Sony is shortsighted and really sounds like you love your Kindle and are trying to justify spending $100 over the Sony Reader's $300 price.
Correction
by csmith75 December 19, 2007 12:24 PM PST
Books are unbelievably expensive for the Sony Reader? I just took a look at a couple of books on their bestsellers page and compared them to Amazon's books and most of the time they either matched their prices or were a dollar or two higher. Hardly, what I would call unbelievably expensive. I even took a look at the most expensive book (Get Rich, Stay Rich, Pass It On) on the front page and it was actually five dollars cheaper than the Kindle version.

I believe that Sony dropped the prices of their books along with other ebook stores like Fictionwise to compete with Amazon.

As far as formats, the Sony Reader supports TXT / RTF / PDF (unencrypted), along with Sony's proprietary format. These are popular formats as far as Project Gutenberg and other sites are concerned. Amazon chose not to support the popular Mobipocket format that other sites sell and which Amazon sold as well. Instead they created their own proprietary version and alienated all those people who had purchased Mobipocket books from Amazon.

I'm not saying the Sony Reader is perfect, but just trying to clear up some misinformation.
cyrillic alphabet
by netmate December 18, 2007 5:33 PM PST
I wonder if Sony-Reader supports cyrillic alphabet?
Reply to this comment
cyrillic alphabet
by netmate December 18, 2007 5:33 PM PST
I wonder if Sony-Reader supports cyrillic alphabet?
Reply to this comment
if you can't spare 65 seconds then get a life!
by Mike Van De North December 19, 2007 4:41 AM PST
I don't usually reaspond to somthing like this but I couldn't belive what I was reading! 65 seconds, my god! How Dare they put out a product that takes 65 seconds to load somthing! they should be flogged, they should be tared and feathered! Keel haul them!

Give me a freaking break! Take a walk around the houseand lok out the windows, pet the dog or the cat, Feed the fish, stop and smell the roses! then go back and read your book becasue by then it will be loaded!
Reply to this comment
Luddities unite (not really)
by QuetzalcoatlUSA December 20, 2007 3:08 PM PST
Ordinarily, I'd agree with you but that's not why people by digital readers. If an iPod took 65 seconds to load a song, Apple stock price would be about $500 less than it is now, and Steve Jobs would be selling pencil erasers on the street corner.
if you can't spare 65 seconds then get a life!
by Mike Van De North December 19, 2007 4:41 AM PST
I don't usually reaspond to somthing like this but I couldn't belive what I was reading! 65 seconds, my god! How Dare they put out a product that takes 65 seconds to load somthing! they should be flogged, they should be tared and feathered! Keel haul them!

Give me a freaking break! Take a walk around the houseand lok out the windows, pet the dog or the cat, Feed the fish, stop and smell the roses! then go back and read your book becasue by then it will be loaded!
Reply to this comment
Luddities unite (not really)
by QuetzalcoatlUSA December 20, 2007 3:08 PM PST
Ordinarily, I'd agree with you but that's not why people by digital readers. If an iPod took 65 seconds to load a song, Apple stock price would be about $500 less than it is now, and Steve Jobs would be selling pencil erasers on the street corner.
no loading but calculating page breaks
by ianm74 December 19, 2007 7:11 AM PST
Loading large books is slow because the reader is calculating where the page offsets should be. It needs to do this in order to give you the page count at the bottom of the screen. Perhaps this could be done on a separate thread in order to keep the UI more responsive. One way to work around this is to open the book in the PC reader software first. This causes the same pagination load to be done but on your PC with a much more powerful processor this is much quicker. Then when you copy the book to the reader ( using the reader software ) the page offset information is copied as well so it doesn't need to be calculated at first file open time. Hope this is useful.
Reply to this comment
no loading but calculating page breaks
by ianm74 December 19, 2007 7:11 AM PST
Loading large books is slow because the reader is calculating where the page offsets should be. It needs to do this in order to give you the page count at the bottom of the screen. Perhaps this could be done on a separate thread in order to keep the UI more responsive. One way to work around this is to open the book in the PC reader software first. This causes the same pagination load to be done but on your PC with a much more powerful processor this is much quicker. Then when you copy the book to the reader ( using the reader software ) the page offset information is copied as well so it doesn't need to be calculated at first file open time. Hope this is useful.
Reply to this comment
(24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement