Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life

Comments on: Nikon answers Canon with full-frame SLR

The $5,000 D3 will be Nikon's first digital SLR whose sensor is the size of a full frame of 35mm film.
Photos: Nikon's full-frame SLR

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
New wide zoom is a 14-24 f2.8G ED
by mbenedict August 24, 2007 7:25 AM PDT
Not 12-24/2.8 as stated. (Nikon has an existing 12-24/2.8 DX.)
Reply to this comment
Change made
by mike ricciuti August 24, 2007 8:02 AM PDT
You are correct--we've made the change to the story. thanks for reading news.com.
How will they answer Canon now?
by rpphoto555 August 24, 2007 8:47 AM PDT
Interesting that Canon increased their flagship camera to 21mp,
like one day before this was announced.
Reply to this comment
compatibility horse is out of the barn
by Razzl August 24, 2007 9:38 AM PDT
In the formative days of digital, pro- and semi-pro photographers were demanding full-frame digitals because it would have enabled them to make the transition to digital using the expensive collections of 35mm lenses they had built up. Unfortunately, the industry was reluctant to comply and the photographers were unaware of the technical differences between electronic receiving plates and film. Now that time has passed most of the 35mm lenses everyone was hoping to use are obsolete because of changes in lense electronics and camera interfaces, and photographers understand that lenses must be made to optimize the image against the curved digital sensors. 35mm full-frame compatibility is yesterday's issue, too late to serve the original need, though such cameras will serve as a poor man's "medium format". There are size and weight advantages to the smaller-sensor SLR's and the manufacturers just need to be sure their lense lines include genuine wideangle lenses, the focal lengths that disappeared when 35mm lenses were retooled into digitals...
Reply to this comment
There still are a lot of old lenses floating around
by Shankland August 24, 2007 10:27 AM PDT
I agree with you for the most part, especially since a lot of buyers of lower-end SLRs never had an SLR before. But there are a lot of pros out there who still use old lenses--good ones don't go out of date as fast as computers--so I don't think the issue of compatibility with existing lens collections still has some currency. In addition, some people might enjoy getting the original behavior back--for example, a favorite 70-200mm zoom being a more moderate telephoto.
View reply
The digital Cinema has arrived.
by disco-legend-zeke August 24, 2007 12:33 PM PDT
Hollywood has been using 4K digital (4000 pixels horizontally, and however many it takes vertically to make the aspect ratio.) for post production for several years now.

One unexpected side effect of the thange was a new standard for makeup. The digital post production process was so much sharper than 35MM internegative, release prints, etc., the guys eyeliner became visible.

Now we see imaging chips that exceed the editing formats, the processing frame rate is faster than needed, MPEG uses 2 keyframes per second, the rest is motion data, easily picked up by a second, standard definition, 60i or higher, camera placed two inches to the right. The vector information from the offset, the motion information from the high speed camera, and the SHD spatial information from the SLR's chip provide the movie's editors with a fully time rendered, three dimensional model of the event being photographed.

More real than real, and the actors possibly more Human then Human.
Reply to this comment
the lense for Einstein's space
by Razzl August 24, 2007 3:01 PM PDT
You mention 3d modelling from sofware. I find it intriguing to consider what frontiers are left for the lense as imaging device and the one frontier I see ahead which was never exploited by the camera industry during the heyday of 35mm film photography is the use of the bellows lense for almost unlimited perspective control. Maybe it was because the bellows lenses used on the View Camera seemed so quaint that nobody cared what they did, but the View Camera remains one of the most powerful imaging devices in photography because of its unique control over perspective. I realize software can edit perspective after the fact, but flexible-tube bellows with autofocus or internal joints could allow astonishing feats of photography out in the field, and editing "in camera" is always preferable to software as the first step...
Long time coming
by mjd420nova August 26, 2007 7:23 PM PDT
It seems to me that I saw a full frame insert for optical 35 mm cameras as a drop in accessory a while back. Advertised for $800. supposedly, I looked everywhere and no one had seem and few had heard of such a device. Just give me a cannister and window image size device and I'll be happy. Don't give me all that automatic controls, maybe a USB port or XD/SD memory slot. I know it can be done but will the mfgrs do it..
Reply to this comment
by vladimir5130 December 28, 2008 1:01 PM PST
I bought Nikon D40X 1 year ago... and I am still happy that made correct choice.
This is really nice camera with nice lens. I just wish to have in our city (Lviv) more repair centers for Nikon cameras. Month ago I had a small problem with battery, nobody could repair it. Everybody asked to find repair instruction. In Internet there is no good instructions. Found just:
<a href="http://free-online-atv-repair-manuals.dorchik-4.co.cc/map.html">repair manual for D40</a>
and
<a href="http://bct8-repair-manual.n-year.co.cc/map.html">nicon repair manual</a>

But on these sites I didn't found info that I need... Maybe somebody can give me links to other such sites?
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement