Comments on: Apple recalls 1.8 million batteries
update Company's recall, not as big as Dell's, affects many iBook G4 and PowerBook G4 laptop models.
Photos: Checking for recalled batteries
update Company's recall, not as big as Dell's, affects many iBook G4 and PowerBook G4 laptop models.
Photos: Checking for recalled batteries
January 4, 2010 5:54 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:38 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:28 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
:)
the 21st century. Big deal.
We have even older and functional desk top machine that is so old they has a floppy drive too. Apple has not had those for almost a decade. We can sill reference records via this machine too.
As a matter of interest I have a box of 8 inch floppies. Each side holds 128 Kbytes! No, I don't have a drive for this one. The biggest floppy I have ever seen was an early one used in the census and was 36 inches. It had one differene in that it never rotated more than 270 degrees.
duke
Lenovo provided a little more detail, saying that while it uses the same Sony battery cells, it relies on a different technique for packaging and charging the cells. Sony assured Lenovo that its technology was implemented differently than Apple's or Dell's, a company representative said.
Gateway said, "Based on available information and our suppliers' input, we do not believe our systems are at risk for the same malfunctions that caused our competitors to issue battery recalls. It appears that a combination of factors led to the fault requiring the recalls, and this combination is not present in our systems. Gateway notebooks use different battery cells than those implicated in our competitor's recalls."
Let's not take such a leap before the facts are in. Your using a very broad brush when you make statments like that.
The rest of the world's laptop batteries are made in China. What does that say about China vs. Japan quality?
The important thing to take away from both of these recalls is to NEVER trust Sony products again. When Dell announced their recall, Sony claimed it was due to incompatibility with Dell's chargers, which is now obviously not the case.
Sony is a deceptive electronics company that produces poor quality products and frequently lies to its consumers.
Absolutely nothing. What it "say," is that Apple didn't do proper quality assurance testing before reselling these batteries. And now they are faced with the second biggest recall in U.S. history involving electronics.
?Sony has said the overheating problem is believed to be specific to batteries supplied to Dell and that an incompatibility between the battery cells and Dell's recharge system was to blame.?
To me it looks like the real answer is Sony's design documents that they sent to the manufactures on how to build for the battery's use was fundamentally flawed and is not causing the problem just for Dell, but for a multitude of manufacturers. I will not be surprised if this is expanded to other manufacturers that use Sony batteries.
How will Sony respond now is my question. More importantly how much money are they about to loose? Good thing I dumped that stock last week.
over-stresses the batteries. Call it Dell?s fault, call it Sony?s fault,
but the bottom line in that situation is a simple incompatibility
problem that presumably won?t be an issue for any other
manufacturer.
computers don?t have this problem at all; it?s the older ones that
shipped with funky batteries.
Actually, I?m kind of glad they?re recalling them. After 2+ years of
use, laptop batteries tend to have lost some of their charge and
this way I can get some new ones! :)
Not only do they have to pay out to help Dell, but they'll probably have to help pay for this recall as well. Not only that, but this may not be the last company to recall laptops that use Sony batteries.
I wouldn't be surprised if some companies come out and publicly announce that they will stop using Sony laptop batteries altogether.
Another nail in the coffin that this company has built.
IT also explains why the PS3 games, according to the latest information available at various PS3 news sites, will cost more than $60.0 U.S. dollars. Estimates are leaning towards 70-80 range.
Ah Sony, how low we have sunk. Glad I don't own Sony stock.
this morning that the CPSC cleared Apple's batteries as being ok,
but Apple chose to protect its customers nonetheless.
here, not a motherboard, graphics card, or a hard drive.
personally will ever use, including your cheap, Walmart toenail
clippers.
as well! The real story here is Sony and their QA on these battery!
This is not a MAC vs PC issue!
Now those dudes have foot in mouth.
http://www.ktvu.com/technology/9728922/detail.html
message that my battery's serial number was invalid, even
though it falls squarely within the recall range. Has anyone else
had this problem? Oh, I did buy this battery at the Apple Store,
too.
my two Apple Powerbooks (that clearly fell withing the serial
numbers being recalled) I spent three hours either attempting to
dial into the phone number offered (total joke) or waiting before
someone answered only to tell me they couldn't take the
information over the phone. I love my Apple computers, but have
always hated Apple's idea of service - thanks for reminding me why
Apple!
- Weird Apple Statistics
- by Ars Venture August 24, 2006 6:29 PM PDT
- This is what you're forced to believe if you're a Mac fan:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Go away pre-teen monkey!
- by anarchyreigns August 24, 2006 6:58 PM PDT
- <eom>
- Like this
-
- That's just dumb.
- by Macsaresafer August 24, 2006 7:08 PM PDT
- First, recent articles have put Mac market share at between 4.6%
- Like this View reply
Processing -
Showing 1 of 2 pages (115 Comments)>> you are still wrong, as recent estimates put it at around 4.8% and climbing.>>
Sorry, it's 2.5 percent and it goes up and down (but around 2 percent). That's what the reliable sites (IDC, Gartner) say, from Apple's and the industry's sales figures, not "estimates."
>> I reiterate my earlier post: Macs command roughly 15-20% of the home market. >>
Right. Any figures from an independent source, not a Mac fanboi site?
>> For the last three years, over 50% of all Macs sold have been to first-time Mac users. >>
That's a "statistic" reported only by the Apple Stores. If that was actually true, it means that repeat buyers of Macs have been in the 1.2-3.0 million a year range. Must be a lot jumping ship.
>> Market share itself is not an indicator of quality.>>
It's what people choose to buy. If they don't want a Mac, they prefer a PC. It's right for them.
>> Macintosh Computer dominate the top tier of Graphics, Web, Multimedia, Video and Scientific Production and Modeling.
If you take your figures from ten years ago, they do.
>> PS -- In my Production Company:
Yeah - I worked for a $12 billion company, without a Mac in the place.
and 4.8% of the total market. That includes corporate sales,
where IT staff have locked out almost everything but Windows as
a way to ensure job security. More problems equals more need
for them. Don't believe me? Your last point, that you worked at a
$12 billion company with no Macs is telling, since IT people
routinely claim that you should use the best sytem for the job.
The odds of any one OS being best for every job at a company
that size are incredibly small. So small that it is statistically
impossible.
Second, if you spend any time in an Apple store you'll likely
bump into one of those new to Mac buyers. They're easy to spot,
since Windows has taught them to worry about computer
purchases. They have heard that Macs are easier to use and far
less trouble, but they haven't yet learned it for themselves. This
results in a worried, yet hopeful look that longtime Mac users
don't have.
What makes your post just plain dumb though, is where you try
to refute the fact that market share isn't an indicator of quality.
Maybe you're just not old enought to remember the Ford Pinto.
It was a piece of junk that didn't just break down easily, it also
had a disturbing tendency to explode if hit from behind, even in
a low speed collision. That car was the number one seller for at
least two years, even though just about every car on the market
was better in many ways!
People don't choose Windows because it's what they prefer. They
choose it because it's the only thing they know about.