Version: 2008

Comments on: Blank Blu-ray discs start shipping

Next-generation optical discs are headed to retailers, but the players aren't here yet.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
No major concern.....
by Earl Benser April 10, 2006 3:22 PM PDT
The disks are too expensive. The players, if they ever show up,
will be too expensive. The format war with HD-DVD remains
unresolved. HDTV on regular DVD with MPEG-4 compression
still is the best option. And of course, Sony is unfortunately
pushing the Blu-Ray - like it's another rootkit???

No thanks. I'll check back in a year or so to see if anything really
worthwhile has occurred. But for now, regular DVD's play just
fine on my 61" HDTV. I would rather have HDTV DVD's, but not
the way Sony and Toshiba want me to.
Reply to this comment
yep
by techguy83 April 10, 2006 5:46 PM PDT
this pretty much says it all.
No major concern.....
by Earl Benser April 10, 2006 3:22 PM PDT
The disks are too expensive. The players, if they ever show up,
will be too expensive. The format war with HD-DVD remains
unresolved. HDTV on regular DVD with MPEG-4 compression
still is the best option. And of course, Sony is unfortunately
pushing the Blu-Ray - like it's another rootkit???

No thanks. I'll check back in a year or so to see if anything really
worthwhile has occurred. But for now, regular DVD's play just
fine on my 61" HDTV. I would rather have HDTV DVD's, but not
the way Sony and Toshiba want me to.
Reply to this comment
yep
by techguy83 April 10, 2006 5:46 PM PDT
this pretty much says it all.
No Need For It
by Dead Soulman April 10, 2006 4:04 PM PDT
This is another one of those silly wars between manufacturers to squeeze more and more money out of the same old and boring content.

Where are the SACD and 5.1 audio cd's, who bought them??? Not me. I'm not saying the sound quality wasn't there. But, people don't want to replace everything in their household just to make Sony and Toshiba a whole lot richer.

I'm sure there's an improvement from standard definition. But, for God's sake, didn't Hollywood start to make the real money from DVD sales once the DVD players went under $150. Now that the lake of money from DVD sales is drying up, it's time to squeeze it a bit more with something else and new.

Not me, at least not for another couple of years. I'm not going to play guinea pig to Sony and Toshiba. Let the mega rich balance the scale and once one format is globally accepted and the prices have come down, maybe then we'll talk. Until then, regular DVDs are perfect for me.
Reply to this comment
You are careful but the average consumer...
by aabcdefghij987654321 April 11, 2006 6:54 AM PDT
You are careful but the average consumer is still buying the "Full Frame" DVDs even though the average DVD player can be made to show a Widescreen DVD in Full Frame. How many people who bought Full Frame DVDs will go back and replace them with Wide Screen versions once they get a Wide Screen TV?

The movie industry could have explained that little problem ton consumers and not even bothered to sell Full Frame versions of movies but this way they get a larger income stream.

When they finally do start providing HD DVDs watch out that they don't provide them in multiple versions there too.
No Need For It
by Dead Soulman April 10, 2006 4:04 PM PDT
This is another one of those silly wars between manufacturers to squeeze more and more money out of the same old and boring content.

Where are the SACD and 5.1 audio cd's, who bought them??? Not me. I'm not saying the sound quality wasn't there. But, people don't want to replace everything in their household just to make Sony and Toshiba a whole lot richer.

I'm sure there's an improvement from standard definition. But, for God's sake, didn't Hollywood start to make the real money from DVD sales once the DVD players went under $150. Now that the lake of money from DVD sales is drying up, it's time to squeeze it a bit more with something else and new.

Not me, at least not for another couple of years. I'm not going to play guinea pig to Sony and Toshiba. Let the mega rich balance the scale and once one format is globally accepted and the prices have come down, maybe then we'll talk. Until then, regular DVDs are perfect for me.
Reply to this comment
You are careful but the average consumer...
by aabcdefghij987654321 April 11, 2006 6:54 AM PDT
You are careful but the average consumer is still buying the "Full Frame" DVDs even though the average DVD player can be made to show a Widescreen DVD in Full Frame. How many people who bought Full Frame DVDs will go back and replace them with Wide Screen versions once they get a Wide Screen TV?

The movie industry could have explained that little problem ton consumers and not even bothered to sell Full Frame versions of movies but this way they get a larger income stream.

When they finally do start providing HD DVDs watch out that they don't provide them in multiple versions there too.
Yea, but where are the recorders?
by gkflyboy April 10, 2006 6:59 PM PDT
Blank Blu-Ray discs, that's nice, the PLAYERS are not even out yet, let alone any type of recorders... useful....
Reply to this comment
no recorders?
by ron836 April 11, 2006 3:17 AM PDT
I'm thinking the same way. Who wants Blank Blu-Ray discs?......Useless.
Yea, but where are the recorders?
by gkflyboy April 10, 2006 6:59 PM PDT
Blank Blu-Ray discs, that's nice, the PLAYERS are not even out yet, let alone any type of recorders... useful....
Reply to this comment
no recorders?
by ron836 May 2, 2008 6:31 PM PDT
I'm thinking the same way. Who wants Blank Blu-Ray discs?......Useless.
Too expensive
by Chibi-Acer April 10, 2006 7:15 PM PDT
At $20 for 25GB, you might as well buy external hard drives. And if the disc somehow screws up, you'll have one of the world's most expensive coasters.

I suppose if you make HD home videos and want to watch them on a separate Blu-ray video player, this would be the way to go, but as far as data storage goes the price will need to come way down.
Reply to this comment
Agreed
by fred dunn April 11, 2006 11:05 AM PDT
Until Blu-Ray either consolidates with HD-DVD or becomes the decisive winner and the recorders cost about the same as today's higher-quality DVD writers you won't see me buying any of this bleeding edge junk.
I still think DVD-DL is too expensive much less about $1/GB for Blu_Ray media. You're right, You could get a quality RAID backup system for that.

Fred
Too expensive
by Chibi-Acer April 10, 2006 7:15 PM PDT
At $20 for 25GB, you might as well buy external hard drives. And if the disc somehow screws up, you'll have one of the world's most expensive coasters.

I suppose if you make HD home videos and want to watch them on a separate Blu-ray video player, this would be the way to go, but as far as data storage goes the price will need to come way down.
Reply to this comment
Agreed
by fred dunn April 11, 2006 11:05 AM PDT
Until Blu-Ray either consolidates with HD-DVD or becomes the decisive winner and the recorders cost about the same as today's higher-quality DVD writers you won't see me buying any of this bleeding edge junk.
I still think DVD-DL is too expensive much less about $1/GB for Blu_Ray media. You're right, You could get a quality RAID backup system for that.

Fred
garbage is garbage, no matter how much of it you have
by perfectblue97 April 11, 2006 12:09 AM PDT
Last years crop of movies was so poor, I'd only consider buying most of them if I saw them in the bargin bin.

If Sony wants me to pay a premium price for Blu-Ray, they had better kick hollywood into shape and get some good content out.

I'd pay if I thought that I was getting quality, but a bad film is a bad film in HD or standard quality.
Reply to this comment
garbage is garbage, no matter how much of it you have
by perfectblue97 April 11, 2006 12:09 AM PDT
Last years crop of movies was so poor, I'd only consider buying most of them if I saw them in the bargin bin.

If Sony wants me to pay a premium price for Blu-Ray, they had better kick hollywood into shape and get some good content out.

I'd pay if I thought that I was getting quality, but a bad film is a bad film in HD or standard quality.
Reply to this comment
Technology has to develop.
by techlove April 11, 2006 6:24 AM PDT
Hi,

I love technology and it should not stop, growing. New technologies, are always welcome. The user can decide, which one to go for, "BLU-RAY" or "HD-DVD". If new technologies, had not come, please think, what all would have been missing, from our lives.

Regards,
Anil Alias.
Reply to this comment
Technology has to develop.
by techlove April 11, 2006 6:24 AM PDT
Hi,

I love technology and it should not stop, growing. New technologies, are always welcome. The user can decide, which one to go for, "BLU-RAY" or "HD-DVD". If new technologies, had not come, please think, what all would have been missing, from our lives.

Regards,
Anil Alias.
Reply to this comment
Blu-ray is the best!
by Chef Boyardee October 11, 2006 3:16 PM PDT
I'm just kidding.
Reply to this comment
Blu-ray is the best!
by Chef Boyardee October 11, 2006 3:16 PM PDT
I'm just kidding.
Reply to this comment
by raazza August 10, 2009 10:22 PM PDT
check out intresting reviews and news about Blu-ray on....http://news-revuez.blogspot.com/
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement