Comments on: Digital TVs: More screen for less green
With prices for high-end TVs dropping, a 50-inch plasma, LCD or projection television set may be in your future.![]()
With prices for high-end TVs dropping, a 50-inch plasma, LCD or projection television set may be in your future.![]()
December 29, 2009 3:53 PM PST
December 29, 2009 2:50 PM PST
December 29, 2009 2:04 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Now that consumers will have even less money leading up to Christmas, prices will have to drop by 50% or more to entice anyone other than the rabid sports fans.
I want a $500 HD TV and I'm waiting until it's offered.
Contrary to popular belief the 42 inch (1024x768) is not HDTV because 720p is 1280x720... so it is a bit short on the horizontal.
However, what is often overlooked is the native on screen resolution.
Sure... they all CLAIM to support all four HDTV formats (720i, 720p, 1080i, 1080p) but most of them don't really. The vast majority of currently shipping systems have only 1280x720 pixels showing on the physical screen. Most claiming support for the 1080i and/or 1080p standard down sample any 1080i/1080p signal to 720p and display it at that resolution.
I'll wait for a decently priced system that can natively show all four standards on the screen. Show me a 50+ inch which does that and costs less than $2,000, and I'll open up my wallet.
And where are the sets that support the new digital cinema format ratified over a year ago(4096 x 2160)? (Just joking. I don't expect to see a consumer system supporting that standard for at least 10 more years. Yet a 72+ inch system with that resolution and 7.1 sound would mean I'd never have to go to the cinema again!)
140 foot screen... 45.7 surround sound... 14,000 Watt rear speakers (all eight of them)...
Until I can put that in my living room and completely demolish every house in a thirty mile radius, my wallet's closed.
:-)
Okay, maybe not.
(Also note that 1080i loses a significant amount of resolution due to interlace, and generally doesn't display 1920 across anyway, with 1440 much more common due to limitations of cameras, displays, or just the compression needed to get it into the channel, plus interlace doesn't compress as well in the first place. So just because it has a bigger number associated with it does not mean that it's actually better-looking than 720p.)
In that sense, the 1080p sets will give the best of both worlds.
But you have a good point: the article is talking about DLP, plasma and LCD, but then at one point appearantly quotes a price for a *CRT* rear projector, which are much cheaper. Not that there's anything wrong with CRT projectors, but without noting that fact it seems a bit deceptive.
As for the new projection tv's, they're only in the running until people actually see one in the store and realize that the picture quality still rots and you still can't hang them on the wall. If only 20,000 units are being shipped (instead of the 18 MILLION plasma/lcd units mentioned) then 80% of them must be floor models to fill up space in retail stores. They will stay there until they can be donated to Salvation Army next year...
- Forget about it...
- by baggyguy1218 September 3, 2005 6:24 AM PDT
- HD TVs will not go down (meaning cheaper than today) in price until all programming is delivered in digital/High Definition. Once a digital TV is the norm, then prices will drop considerablly. For all of you not willing to spend the money, they do offer CRT HiDef TVs for around 500 dollars. December 31 2006 at 11:59 pm, we will find out what HD has in store.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(9 Comments)