Comments on: HDTV market to boom, study says

But growth may be stunted by scanty content, market researcher In-Stat says.

Biggest Hurdle: Cost

I was at the electronics store yesterday, and spent time looking at the HDTV choices. The biggest problem I see is that the sets are way too expensive still, ranging from $1500 (for a tiny one) to nearly $10k! For anything reasonably sized, we're talking $3000!

If the manufacturers want a higher adoption rate, they need to get the costs down substantially.

[markdoiron]

I Agree . . .

... that cost is the biggest hurdle, especially when one can't be certain if that expense will work with next week's digital standards. that is, there's an incredible amount of consumer confusion over standards. there are differing audio formats for the sound, differing line/interlace standards for the video, and continually evolving capacity standards for dvd media. this technology must get its collective act together before the consumer will commit the big bucks.

mark d.

[Tex Murphy PI]

Biggest Hurdle: Congress and Studios

The problem of demand isn't necessarily the cost of the sets themselves (which goes down as soon as HDTV becomes the defacto standard) - but in getting HDTV programming itself.

If you look at the choices for HDTV programming, the selection is pretty grim:

* ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox have a very limited array of HDTV programming - less than 10%
* Zoom is the only satellite provider that broadcasts in HDTV, but that is only a about 20 or so channels - and even those aren't always HDTV. Overall HDTV content for entire service, maybe 20%
* The Networks claim that they cannot broadcast in HDTV because of "poor demand", yet they drag their feet at every "deadline" set by Congress for conversion to HDTV.
* Congress (like the U.N.) drags their feet on everything, especially HDTV. Their "mandates" for HDTV program and spectrum conversions have been pushed back so many times that nobody really takes them seriously anymore.
* Unrealistic metrics for triggering HDTV mandates will never be achieved, because it expects an unrealistic level of HDTV penetration for TERRESTRIAL users (which has a very low penetration rate), and doesn't take into account Cable and Satellite users who tend to adop the technologies at a faster rate.

Unrealistic metrics. Unenforced "Mandates". Lazy Network executives. All of these factors result in the lack of any HDTV programming, which results in low demand. Low demand = low volume of shipment = high prices.

Hey, I like the Discover channel's HDTV quality, but I'm realistically not going to be sitting down and watching nature shows ALL the time!

Biggest Hurdle: Cost

I was at the electronics store yesterday, and spent time looking at the HDTV choices. The biggest problem I see is that the sets are way too expensive still, ranging from $1500 (for a tiny one) to nearly $10k! For anything reasonably sized, we're talking $3000!

If the manufacturers want a higher adoption rate, they need to get the costs down substantially.

[markdoiron]

I Agree . . .

... that cost is the biggest hurdle, especially when one can't be certain if that expense will work with next week's digital standards. that is, there's an incredible amount of consumer confusion over standards. there are differing audio formats for the sound, differing line/interlace standards for the video, and continually evolving capacity standards for dvd media. this technology must get its collective act together before the consumer will commit the big bucks.

mark d.

[Tex Murphy PI]

Biggest Hurdle: Congress and Studios

The problem of demand isn't necessarily the cost of the sets themselves (which goes down as soon as HDTV becomes the defacto standard) - but in getting HDTV programming itself.

If you look at the choices for HDTV programming, the selection is pretty grim:

* ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox have a very limited array of HDTV programming - less than 10%
* Zoom is the only satellite provider that broadcasts in HDTV, but that is only a about 20 or so channels - and even those aren't always HDTV. Overall HDTV content for entire service, maybe 20%
* The Networks claim that they cannot broadcast in HDTV because of "poor demand", yet they drag their feet at every "deadline" set by Congress for conversion to HDTV.
* Congress (like the U.N.) drags their feet on everything, especially HDTV. Their "mandates" for HDTV program and spectrum conversions have been pushed back so many times that nobody really takes them seriously anymore.
* Unrealistic metrics for triggering HDTV mandates will never be achieved, because it expects an unrealistic level of HDTV penetration for TERRESTRIAL users (which has a very low penetration rate), and doesn't take into account Cable and Satellite users who tend to adop the technologies at a faster rate.

Unrealistic metrics. Unenforced "Mandates". Lazy Network executives. All of these factors result in the lack of any HDTV programming, which results in low demand. Low demand = low volume of shipment = high prices.

Hey, I like the Discover channel's HDTV quality, but I'm realistically not going to be sitting down and watching nature shows ALL the time!

[baggyguy1218]

Tiny?

I dont know what your term tiny is implying buddy! Last time I checked 44 inches was good enough for most people. Also where is this electronics store you went too? I need to know so that I never go there to buy anything! I bought a Toshiba DLP and I think its great, especially in HD. Maybe ou should check another store and get back to me, or maybe you shouldnt shop at a drugstopre for your HD tvs.

[baggyguy1218]

Tiny?

I dont know what your term tiny is implying buddy! Last time I checked 44 inches was good enough for most people. Also where is this electronics store you went too? I need to know so that I never go there to buy anything! I bought a Toshiba DLP and I think its great, especially in HD. Maybe ou should check another store and get back to me, or maybe you shouldnt shop at a drugstopre for your HD tvs.