Comments on: Intel shows off Mac Mini-like concept PC
At conference, chipmaker tries to spur creativity among computer makers, but company won't likely make such a device.![]()
Photos: Intel's own mini PC
At conference, chipmaker tries to spur creativity among computer makers, but company won't likely make such a device.![]()
Photos: Intel's own mini PC
January 5, 2010 6:00 PM PST
January 5, 2010 5:27 PM PST
January 5, 2010 5:24 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I would be funny to see Intel build their little Mini. I guarantee it would use the Pentium M procs. If the stuck a P4 in there you could use it to cook a steak.
The Presario uses an AMD Athlon processor, which runs a lot cooler than a comparable Intel-based system. Less heat means less of a cooling problem. Compaq used a very quiet power supply for the system, and placed a large passive airflow "grid" in back. There is a cooling fan on the CPU which is also very quiet.
I wish I could say the same for my graphics card. I purchased an ATI All In Wonder 9000 card just over a year. The "wonder" is that the bearings in the processor cooling fan started failing, causing the card to make a horrendous sound. The sound was so bad I decided to replace the fan. On inspecting the card and removing the fan screws, I found that I could not unseat the fan, probably because it was cemented in. Not wanting to break the card, I decided to throw caution to the wind and simply disconnect the fan. The AT card now makes no sound, and continues to work reliably.
The moral of this story? Your computer will only be as quiet as the highest decibel component. And that may change over time! I hope there is a special place in Hell reserved for manufacturers who put shoddy, cheap plastic bearings in components.
Keith
www.techcando.com
It is obvious Intel saw the Mac Mini when it was released, and found they needed something similar to show at their conference.
I mean, when I was following industrial design courses, this was the typical product of student design projects. And I can even say the concepts we created were far more innovative than this box.
Everyone with a little bit of imagination and a good pair of hands can build a box like that in just a few hours...
Intel's "announcement" isn't new.
The Via board is also fanless!
Heres a pic of a fanless model: http://www.stealthcomputer.com/littlepc_fanless.htm
You can see lots of other little machines here: http://www.mini-itx.com/ - and smaller than your toaster
xserves are too noisy and too expensive for the home. iMacs too bulky and mostly pointless for the money. I have a Mac Mini and an an Airport Extreme and they give me great musical joy, great tv/film playback, somewhere to stash downloads, somewhere to sync my phone to, and if i need a graphics head I open the lid and get my laptop instantly on thanks to apple's idea of sleep.
But i don't diss it!
Intel might be better off trying to work with Apple to create a chipset for a future rev of the Mac. But don't misunderstand the market Intel: it's because of Windows, stupid.
It seems as soon as Apple announced this Mini-Me-Mac thing everyone jumps on the band waggon thinking they have invented a new wheel or something
or http://www.stealthcomputer.com/littlepc.htm
They have CPU options of Pentium 4's up to 3.2GHz with 800MHz FSB. They also have numerous different options like PCMCIA, Wi-Fi and many more.
http://www.stealthcomputer.com/littlepc.htm
or
http://www.littlepc.com
That said. I will check out your links. Sounds (or doesn't sound) cool.
**IMO Section**
Let me point a finger and start an argument. Why would you want to buy an Intel chip anyway? AMD runs cooler, faster, and cost less. Aside from that Intel has had a lot of egg in their face.
Oh yeah AMD have been more stable than Intels P4 procs as well. Thats not saying much though. Both have had a good run with stability. Intel's main problem is that you just can't keep the higher end P4 cool.
**End Section**
Whats wrong with having a multi-purpose PC? I think the industry has been missing the point all along. I'll take 2 - one to cook my food and one with the super chiller option to keep my brew cool
No offence to the company, but I won't buy one if it doesn't have AMD inside (well not without a good reason anyway).
Sure isn't hard to see why they get paid millions of dollars is it.
This is SO pathetic.
What kind of looser do you have to be when the biggest tech
chip company can't come up with more than an empty plastic
box and a butt ugly box at that.
Intel truly is a complete looser.
desk. No comparison for looks. That is the most worst looking
box, and why don't they show the back. Can you use it as a
frying pan to fry eggs or is it going to be a P3? Hmmmm. Use
to use PC's. NEVER again!
Advise: GET A MAC!
Steve
Calgary, Canada
REAL reason behind Intel's jabs at Apple is very simple.
As soon as "the masses" figure out that you can run UNIX + MAC + LINUX + MS Office for Mac + Virtual PC + convert Open Source & Linux & Unix code to Darwin MAC OSX code via FREE developer toolkit X11 with every Mac sold ALL on a 64Bit PowerPC chip...GEE you don't need Intel & Microsoft anymore...hmmm.
ALTERATE Universe: "the masses" are getting very sick & tired of all the price guoging, vires, spyware, worms, hackers, security updates, forced upgrades to new Windows, monopolistic tactics, etc. & they are converting to Open Source / Linux / Lindows with AMD64 Bit chips...they don't need Intel & Microsoft anymore...hmmm.
Intel's sabers are rattling & UNIX / MAC OSX / LINUX / PowerPC / IBM / AMD64 are putting up a fierce battlefront.
Monopolies fear "thinking different" & "open competion in the marketplace"...
FINALLY: NeXT OS was owned by Steve Jobs & incorporated into the new Mac OSX Unix platform, but was also capable of running on Intel chips in the past. Rumor has it that during this "transitional upgrade development" period at Apple + NeXT, that deep in a vault in Cupertino IS a version of IntelPC-OSX as a secret weapon "Plan B".
Maybe...maybe not...possible on Intel64 or AMD64?
Only the future will tell.
Mac cause of price. But I recently switch to Apple Mac Mini as it
was affordable and for a test drive. All I can say is that I was
surprise how it's way better than Windows based PCs, I can't tell
you all the benefits here as it's not the subject, since I m using
the Mac, I've simply gave my Pc for my little son for games and
use the mac for professional purpose like video edition, office
tasks, webdesign.... What I want to say is that if Intel plans to
sell these small boxes, it won't be as successfull as the Mac
mini. Wy did I switch, simply because it's their Operating system,
that are too genious (no virus, friendly user, fast, design....) and
now affordable. Would you buy a Ferrari or buy a copy without
the powerful engine ?
macs aren't. I guess your impression is because you know a
little about Intel based PCs and nothing about Apple's PCs.
The Mac Perform 638 used an integrated tuner card in 1988 or
abouts. In truth the only real difference between a "PC" and a
"MAC" is the CPU, OS, quality of design, and usability. Windows
has been closing the gap on useability, but that is truly about it.
The OS offers so much more to the average user, and I remain
befuddled why some one would argue to sell someone a "PC" if
they want to use it to manage their internet access, emails, word
processing, graphic and music. Buying a PC for the average
person should require a warning sticker that states:
"will cause virsues, worms, trojan horses, and frequent updates.
This will require loss of time due to manual intervention,
research, and an un-anticipated learning curve (or a technician".
Intel WISHES they were inside the Mac Mini with Mac OSX & iLife Suite.
dream on...
which is hyped as a wonder box and won't do anything.
Tee-hee, tee-hee. I'm too busy giggling to be outraged.
- Mini pc running linux and windowsXP
- by JackeOwen January 12, 2006 6:22 AM PST
- Mini pc running linux and windowsXP, manufacturer of sd-omega mini pc , car pc http://www.sd-omega.com
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(47 Comments)