Version: 2008

Comments on: Photos: iPod Shuffle

New low-price music device has no display--it just shuffles through your tunes.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 2 of 2 pages (64 Comments)
About the built-in, 12-hour battery...
by rpms January 11, 2005 4:50 PM PST
The iPod Shuffle is small, light, and pretty, and Apple was right to omit the screen. The device will benefit from the iPod brand name, but it's not compelling.

In the flash market, the iPod Shuffle is limited by its battery. After just 12 hours you'll have to charge the device. The battery is built-in, so you won't be able to run to the corner store for a new one.* And when the battery reaches the end of its useful life, replacement won't be cheap.

People who want a standard battery and good battery life should consider Sony's NW-E99, which gives 50 hours of play from a single AAA battery. The device measures 2.25 x 1.50 x 0.59 inches, weighs about 2 ounces, has a screen (for those who like that), and now plays MP3 files directly (no more conversion to ATRAC3). Street price for this 1 GB model is $200.

Interestingly, the iPod Shuffle isn't the smallest and lightest MP3 player on the market.

People who want something even smaller should consider BenQ's Joybee 102, which measures 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.3 inches and weighs 0.35 ounces. At this size I can forgive the built-in 8-hour battery and the small 256 MB capacity. Street price is about $160.

Paul Marcelin-Sampson
Santa Cruz, California, USA

IPOD SHUFFLE
- 3.3 x 0.98 x 0.33 inches
- 1.07 cubic inches [calculated volume]
- 0.78 ounces
- built-in rechargeable battery
- 12-hour battery life
- 1 GB model = $150

SONY NW-E55/75/95
- 2.25 x 1.50 x 0.59 inches
- 1.99 cubic inches [calculated volume]
- 2 ounces
- standard AAA battery
- 50-hour battery life (for 128 kbps MP3 files, specifically)
- 1 GB model = $200

BENQ JOYBEE 102R
- 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.30 inches
- 0.90 cubic inches [calculated volume]
- 0.35 ounces
- built-in rechargeable battery
- 8-hour battery life
- 256 MB model = $160

Specifications are from vendor Web pages or manuals, except volumes (in cubic inches), which I calculated from the dimensions. Prices are from various online retailers.

* I realize that an external battery case is available for the iPod Shuffle. The case accepts two AAA batteries, adding weight and bulk for just 20 hours' more play time.
Reply to this comment
Choices = good
by dejo January 11, 2005 8:06 PM PST
It's nice to see there is plenty of competition in this space. Keeps
everybody on their toes.
ummm, battery 12 hour life a problem? NOT
by Thomas, David January 14, 2005 4:42 PM PST
Just plug it in. I bet if you try one u'll get addicted just like the
regular iPod. Oh, I do enjoy your objective comparisons, but
on this one you seem to have missed the popularity if iTunes
and the fact that plugging this in, works the same as any other
iPod. If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you check
it out. The popularity of the iPod is not just style, its the perfect
blend of form and function.
View reply
the battery lasts longer
by scottishfishes8 February 26, 2005 9:09 AM PST
even though Apple's estimated battery life is 12 hours, real world tests have shown that it lasts closer to 20 hours
About the built-in, 12-hour battery...
by rpms January 11, 2005 4:50 PM PST
The iPod Shuffle is small, light, and pretty, and Apple was right to omit the screen. The device will benefit from the iPod brand name, but it's not compelling.

In the flash market, the iPod Shuffle is limited by its battery. After just 12 hours you'll have to charge the device. The battery is built-in, so you won't be able to run to the corner store for a new one.* And when the battery reaches the end of its useful life, replacement won't be cheap.

People who want a standard battery and good battery life should consider Sony's NW-E99, which gives 50 hours of play from a single AAA battery. The device measures 2.25 x 1.50 x 0.59 inches, weighs about 2 ounces, has a screen (for those who like that), and now plays MP3 files directly (no more conversion to ATRAC3). Street price for this 1 GB model is $200.

Interestingly, the iPod Shuffle isn't the smallest and lightest MP3 player on the market.

People who want something even smaller should consider BenQ's Joybee 102, which measures 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.3 inches and weighs 0.35 ounces. At this size I can forgive the built-in 8-hour battery and the small 256 MB capacity. Street price is about $160.

Paul Marcelin-Sampson
Santa Cruz, California, USA

IPOD SHUFFLE
- 3.3 x 0.98 x 0.33 inches
- 1.07 cubic inches [calculated volume]
- 0.78 ounces
- built-in rechargeable battery
- 12-hour battery life
- 1 GB model = $150

SONY NW-E55/75/95
- 2.25 x 1.50 x 0.59 inches
- 1.99 cubic inches [calculated volume]
- 2 ounces
- standard AAA battery
- 50-hour battery life (for 128 kbps MP3 files, specifically)
- 1 GB model = $200

BENQ JOYBEE 102R
- 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.30 inches
- 0.90 cubic inches [calculated volume]
- 0.35 ounces
- built-in rechargeable battery
- 8-hour battery life
- 256 MB model = $160

Specifications are from vendor Web pages or manuals, except volumes (in cubic inches), which I calculated from the dimensions. Prices are from various online retailers.

* I realize that an external battery case is available for the iPod Shuffle. The case accepts two AAA batteries, adding weight and bulk for just 20 hours' more play time.
Reply to this comment
Choices = good
by dejo January 11, 2005 8:06 PM PST
It's nice to see there is plenty of competition in this space. Keeps
everybody on their toes.
ummm, battery 12 hour life a problem? NOT
by Thomas, David January 14, 2005 4:42 PM PST
Just plug it in. I bet if you try one u'll get addicted just like the
regular iPod. Oh, I do enjoy your objective comparisons, but
on this one you seem to have missed the popularity if iTunes
and the fact that plugging this in, works the same as any other
iPod. If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you check
it out. The popularity of the iPod is not just style, its the perfect
blend of form and function.
View reply
the battery lasts longer
by scottishfishes8 February 26, 2005 9:09 AM PST
even though Apple's estimated battery life is 12 hours, real world tests have shown that it lasts closer to 20 hours
Same Old Story
by January 11, 2005 10:02 PM PST
All those people complaining sounds like the same old story.
The same old Mac's suck story... yet you see company after
company copying whatever Apple does. What Apple's problem
really is is implementing their ideas... ie look at the Newton.

I cannot remember when an Apple product wasn't ridiculed... its
part of the process... make a product, great or not, and watch
the PC world follow.

This iPod shuffle... is it brilliant, probably not, but again they
take a chance on design and functionality... and if popular....
companies will start cloning.
Reply to this comment
Same Old Story
by January 11, 2005 10:02 PM PST
All those people complaining sounds like the same old story.
The same old Mac's suck story... yet you see company after
company copying whatever Apple does. What Apple's problem
really is is implementing their ideas... ie look at the Newton.

I cannot remember when an Apple product wasn't ridiculed... its
part of the process... make a product, great or not, and watch
the PC world follow.

This iPod shuffle... is it brilliant, probably not, but again they
take a chance on design and functionality... and if popular....
companies will start cloning.
Reply to this comment
Without Screen......
by 201293546946733175101343322673 January 11, 2005 10:30 PM PST
How can I know what song I am listening right now? Shuffling is a good idea, and $99 is sweet, but......not likely to buy one :(
Reply to this comment
Ok..
by Fray9 February 25, 2005 1:01 PM PST
Ok you picked out the playlist, downloaded it into the Ipod Mini and you cant recognize the song from hearing it?

I dont think your enough of an audiophile to not regret spending $99 on a portable music player so you probably should stay away.
Without Screen......
by 201293546946733175101343322673 January 11, 2005 10:30 PM PST
How can I know what song I am listening right now? Shuffling is a good idea, and $99 is sweet, but......not likely to buy one :(
Reply to this comment
Ok..
by Fray9 February 25, 2005 1:01 PM PST
Ok you picked out the playlist, downloaded it into the Ipod Mini and you cant recognize the song from hearing it?

I dont think your enough of an audiophile to not regret spending $99 on a portable music player so you probably should stay away.
I LIKE PHOTOS ON CNET BETTER THAN THE STORIES!!!
by January 12, 2005 12:00 AM PST
Photos more fun than boring stories.
Reply to this comment
I LIKE PHOTOS ON CNET BETTER THAN THE STORIES!!!
by January 12, 2005 12:00 AM PST
Photos more fun than boring stories.
Reply to this comment
Stop with the "No Screen" statements
by Thomas, David January 14, 2005 4:33 PM PST
99 dollars, no screen, smaller than a pack of gum.

-- First point, if the device was designed to be that small and
function as an iPod, then u'd need a magnifying glass to read the
screen.

-- Second point, if you made it large enough to hold a screen,
you lose the basis for its design, and you start sucking up more
power.

-- Third point, this is an iPod, that holds far less songs than the
other iPods. That means you plug it in and quickly update what
you want on it. No muss, no fuss. The difference being it is
designed not to be used like a library, but simply a portable
player for what you want to listen at that time. If you want
different music, just plug the darn thing in again. It is NOT a
replacement for the other iPods.

-- Fourth Point. So far, the current iPod users I know, including
myself, have ordered one to use. Its small compact, and no
hassle when your are running, working out, etc. No need for a
belt clip, or arm band.

-- Fifth Point. If you want something else, gee, well get it.
Reply to this comment
Stop with the "No Screen" statements
by Thomas, David January 14, 2005 4:33 PM PST
99 dollars, no screen, smaller than a pack of gum.

-- First point, if the device was designed to be that small and
function as an iPod, then u'd need a magnifying glass to read the
screen.

-- Second point, if you made it large enough to hold a screen,
you lose the basis for its design, and you start sucking up more
power.

-- Third point, this is an iPod, that holds far less songs than the
other iPods. That means you plug it in and quickly update what
you want on it. No muss, no fuss. The difference being it is
designed not to be used like a library, but simply a portable
player for what you want to listen at that time. If you want
different music, just plug the darn thing in again. It is NOT a
replacement for the other iPods.

-- Fourth Point. So far, the current iPod users I know, including
myself, have ordered one to use. Its small compact, and no
hassle when your are running, working out, etc. No need for a
belt clip, or arm band.

-- Fifth Point. If you want something else, gee, well get it.
Reply to this comment
Should call it the iTangle
by toddouzts--2008 January 14, 2005 5:57 PM PST
I've been itching to buy an iPod for a while, but I'm not about to
subject myself to being tangled up in cords all the time and
constantly fighting to keep earphones in place. So Apple, I'll be
impressed only when you solve these problems with a low-cost
wireless solution. Or better yet, build the player into the
headphones. The iPod shuffle is small enough for that. Then I'll
buy one.
Reply to this comment
Should call it the iTangle
by toddouzts--2008 January 14, 2005 5:57 PM PST
I've been itching to buy an iPod for a while, but I'm not about to
subject myself to being tangled up in cords all the time and
constantly fighting to keep earphones in place. So Apple, I'll be
impressed only when you solve these problems with a low-cost
wireless solution. Or better yet, build the player into the
headphones. The iPod shuffle is small enough for that. Then I'll
buy one.
Reply to this comment
"Simply" Brilliant!
by January 14, 2005 7:42 PM PST
I think the addition of the ipod shuffle is perfect.

I have been an ipod owner for 3 years. My first was the 3g 20 GB and then I followed with the mini.

I have needed a good flash device to carry important documents and misc files, so the release of the shuffle is perfect due to its small size and USB access.

To me, music capability is just a brilliant addition to make the device even more useful.

If I just ?have to listen? to a specific song, I?ll get my 20GB. But I guarantee you this; I will always have my favorite albums and important files in my pocket, any time, any place.

So quit whining all you high maintenance ?I have just gotta have a screen? people! If you do not like it, don't buy it.

But at least appreciate the product for the niche that it fills.

Good job Apple!
Reply to this comment
"Simply" Brilliant!
by January 14, 2005 7:42 PM PST
I think the addition of the ipod shuffle is perfect.

I have been an ipod owner for 3 years. My first was the 3g 20 GB and then I followed with the mini.

I have needed a good flash device to carry important documents and misc files, so the release of the shuffle is perfect due to its small size and USB access.

To me, music capability is just a brilliant addition to make the device even more useful.

If I just ?have to listen? to a specific song, I?ll get my 20GB. But I guarantee you this; I will always have my favorite albums and important files in my pocket, any time, any place.

So quit whining all you high maintenance ?I have just gotta have a screen? people! If you do not like it, don't buy it.

But at least appreciate the product for the niche that it fills.

Good job Apple!
Reply to this comment
Shuffle is a geat idea...just think about it!
by January 15, 2005 10:13 PM PST
I was one at first that thought that it would fail because it had no
screen and there was no way I would buy one. Then I looked at
it another way. Its a 512 or 1gb thumb drive that has a free
mp3 player built in for a very little extra cost. Two devices in
one.

I'm now hanging out waiting for mine to arrive!
Reply to this comment
Shuffle is a geat idea...just think about it!
by January 15, 2005 10:13 PM PST
I was one at first that thought that it would fail because it had no
screen and there was no way I would buy one. Then I looked at
it another way. Its a 512 or 1gb thumb drive that has a free
mp3 player built in for a very little extra cost. Two devices in
one.

I'm now hanging out waiting for mine to arrive!
Reply to this comment
Message has been deleted.
by January 19, 2005 8:33 PM PST
Reply to this comment
It's legit
by May 29, 2005 11:06 PM PDT
I have 4 out of 5 referrals, so any help would be awesome.

http://www.freeiPods.com/?r=9093773

A kid in my dorm got his ipod, totally free with no hidden charges. email me if you have any questions.

thanks alot, tom
iPod Shuffle is great for the gym
by January 27, 2005 12:02 PM PST
iPod Shuffle is perfect for use in the gym and for running. When
you're in the middle of working out or excersizing, how often do
you fiddle with the screen of your iPod? Me personally, I like to
program it and let it go while I concentrate on my workout. I
don't need a screen. I just need a reliable player that can hold a
fair amount of songs and either play them straight through or
shuffle them.

I had bought a Mini last year for use at the gym and REALLY wish
the shuffle was out then. It would have saved me some money
and hassel. The shuffle is exactly what I was looking for in a
player to use at the gym.

Now that the shuffle is out, IMO, I don't see much need for the
iPod mini, really. The iPod mini is close to the original iPod in
price, but doesn't offer nearly as much storage space. And now
compared to the shuffle, the mini isn't the lightest and smallest
player on the block.

My choice: Shuffle for the gym, regular iPod for all else.

Austin
Reply to this comment
btw
by January 27, 2005 12:07 PM PST
And just to clarify my post... I own both the iPod mini and
Shuffle, so I've experienced both in different situations, and my
opinion is based on this experience.

I'm sorry to see some of these negative posts from people who
probably have no experience with the product and are simply
posting assumptions.
iPod Shuffle is great for the gym
by January 27, 2005 12:02 PM PST
iPod Shuffle is perfect for use in the gym and for running. When
you're in the middle of working out or excersizing, how often do
you fiddle with the screen of your iPod? Me personally, I like to
program it and let it go while I concentrate on my workout. I
don't need a screen. I just need a reliable player that can hold a
fair amount of songs and either play them straight through or
shuffle them.

I had bought a Mini last year for use at the gym and REALLY wish
the shuffle was out then. It would have saved me some money
and hassel. The shuffle is exactly what I was looking for in a
player to use at the gym.

Now that the shuffle is out, IMO, I don't see much need for the
iPod mini, really. The iPod mini is close to the original iPod in
price, but doesn't offer nearly as much storage space. And now
compared to the shuffle, the mini isn't the lightest and smallest
player on the block.

My choice: Shuffle for the gym, regular iPod for all else.

Austin
Reply to this comment
btw
by January 27, 2005 12:07 PM PST
And just to clarify my post... I own both the iPod mini and
Shuffle, so I've experienced both in different situations, and my
opinion is based on this experience.

I'm sorry to see some of these negative posts from people who
probably have no experience with the product and are simply
posting assumptions.
Showing 2 of 2 pages (64 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement