Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks

Comments on: Google unveils cell phone software and alliance

In much the same way it changed the wired Internet, Google plans to revolutionize the mobile Web through its new open software platform.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Google Phone Info Tracking?
by Renegade Knight November 5, 2007 9:33 AM PST
Google tracks what people do on the net, especially if you use google desktop and some other nice tools they put out.

Will the mobile O/S just make them better at tracking everthing? They need to get something out of their O/S because free doesn't really pay the bills.
Reply to this comment
Googles Profit
by dgiamanco November 5, 2007 1:14 PM PST
I actually see this move as benefiting Google in the long run. Cell phones have become common place among the masses. Yet the innovation on this market has been struggling, especially when placing the internet on these devices. By making a more advanced OS that can connect to the internet easier, Google is opening its ad community to a new platform. Current cell phones rarely have ads placed on them, but if Google produces an alliance between carriers and hardware manufactures that makes the internet more common place, then they are in turn allowing more ads to be placed in the hands of consumers.
so much for free service phones...
by pugster November 5, 2007 10:02 AM PST
All this hooplah for nothing. A few weeks ago they were speculating that google will have its phone service where people will get phone service for free if they want to see ads. Now the only thing that we will get from all this is paying maybe $20 less for a phone with google's software.

Maybe it will pull a few customers from ATT and Verizon with their increase content. But if it is not free or significantly reduced price for monthly service, there's little motivation for customers to switch.
Reply to this comment
I wonder
by Nodack November 5, 2007 12:24 PM PST
"Maybe it will pull a few customers from ATT and Verizon with their
increase content."

The iPhone has Google maps built in as an app already and on
AT&T. I have a feeling Google doesn't mind having a piece of more
than one pie at a time and wonder if those new apps will be
available for the iPhone too at some point.
Google's Potential Growth & Untouched Business Opportunities
by Shannon Michael November 5, 2007 12:36 PM PST
Google's "open source" Android software
shall provide users more opportunities to live vicariously through their mobile phones. In tracking the user's online actions, Google to give the 3D persona (avatar) detailed personality characteristics developed from the users real life online living experiences. Second Life's 3D avatar becomes boring and soon to be obsolete. Google is in a position to dominate & manipulate virtual life communities. Why?.... because Google's open application sources and the mobile phone is defining who you are by e-psycho-analyzing your online activities. See language in patents filed by Google...
"User dialog (e.g., from role playing games, simulation games, etc) may be used to characterize the user (e.g., literate, profane, blunt or polite, quiet etc). Also, user play may be used to characterize the user (e.g., cautious, risk-taker, aggressive, non-confrontational, stealthy, honest, cooperative, uncooperative, etc)."

Google's "open source" Android software
applications shall make the ad-supported
free mobile phone/web browser more viable and appealing to the market. Advertising shall be "less in your face & more part of your mentally." Free mobile phone and Internet services supported by something you are really interested in.

Google's "open source" Android software and the mobile phone is the foundation for the evolution of all facets of modern society's future lifestyles.

Shannon McPherson is a Bryn Mawr College student social activist that is campaigning for the use of ad-supported free mobile phone & Internet services to decrease the digital divide.
by jyoungxxxx September 1, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
The government is the only thing stopping google from making free WiFi service available through the white spaces. There are reasons too and it isn't because of interference like they say. It is because of how it will effect businesses like verizon, at&t and t-mobile plus others. If it wasn't for this issue with bussiness we would have free internet. Too bad huh!
Not A "Monkey" Business Alliance - Right!
by Commander_Spock November 5, 2007 10:21 AM PST
"Google took its long-awaited plunge into the wireless world today, announcing that it is leading a broad industry alliance to transform mobile phones into powerful mobile computers that could accelerate the convergence of computing and communications..."

Watch the attached video clip and see if the 800lb Gorilla (that is OS/2) can be spotted!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksFqjI3gyAo

As per the subject line - Not A "Monkey" Business Alliance - Right! So, what else is new!
Reply to this comment
Google's Internet Plan
by Jesse Chan November 5, 2007 10:48 AM PST
This is all part of Google's Internet Plan. I think the move today will also have something to do with the Wi-Fi auction in the future, don't you? http://fishtrain.com/2007/10/10/googles-internet-plan/
Reply to this comment
Maybe, maybe not.
by pugster November 5, 2007 11:18 AM PST
Google's 700mhz auction seem to be conflicting with their plan with their 'open source' move. Google will have to depend on T-mobile and Sprint on the pricing and kind of service they will provide. The only thing i can see with their phone service with google software is the ability to check your gmail account and maybe using google maps as gps. As far as the pricing concern of your monthly service and what kind of content you are allowed to see, you are at the whim from T-mobile and Sprint.

Google probably should've to purchase sprint or t-mobile outright and integrate their advertising knowhow into these phones in their own terms. Google can then give customers free or almost free phone service under their own terms.
Nuance Joins Open Handset Alliance
by Nuance Communications November 5, 2007 11:49 AM PST
Nuance joined the Open Handset Alliance with other industry leaders to grow the entire mobile ecosystem. We?re committed to apply our strength and leadership in voice-based search and messaging to move the market forward. By packaging and optimizing embedded speech technology components for open source distribution, we?ve given developers the opportunity to access speech solutions through open APIs using the Android platform and to easily upgrade to new, more advanced speech features as well. We believe deep collaboration with members of the Alliance will grow our core mobile business and fuel the proliferation of speech-enabled applications worldwide.
Reply to this comment
Google vs. Nokia in LBS
by Quemannn November 5, 2007 12:21 PM PST
Alliances breed alliances.
Google's push into mobile world will meet another giant waiting there: Nokia, which recently acquired Navteq.

Mobile search will eventually converge to location-based features and behaviroal tracking.

Google's mobile alliance with Sprint makes sense, if they bid on 700MHz spectrum early next year.
Reply to this comment
More Personal Info. for Big Brother Google's Ad Database
by john55440 November 5, 2007 12:28 PM PST
A New York Times article points out that "its ultimate goal is to cash in on the effort by selling advertisements to mobile phone users,..."

I'm not interested in giving Big Brother Google my personal cell phone information, for their advertising database.
Reply to this comment
Agreed!!
by trudancor November 6, 2007 6:25 AM PST
I just don't get it. Why does everyone seem so anxious to turn over personal info (where you go, what you read etc..)to google? To save a couple $$ on a phone call? If the feds tried to collect this sort of info, everyone would be up in arms. I guess "free" is a big seller, til its too late. Just remember " there aint no such thing as a free lunch"!

Google may be the 800 pound gorilla, for now, who does no evil. But mutation (business model or otherwise) has a way of putting things on its head, then what becomes of your "life history" stored at Google.
This is great
by rcrusoe November 5, 2007 12:50 PM PST
Any competition in the mobile phone market should result in lower
costs for everyone.

I'd never use one of these if it meant getting advertisements on my
phone, but I applaud the effort.
Reply to this comment
Not sure I get the thrill...
by bob1960 November 5, 2007 1:41 PM PST
As somebody who is learning to program the Symbian OS, has done Windows programming, and read about how to program for the iPhone (with the SDK coming out in Feb '08) I don't see what all the hype is about here... You would be amazed at the feature content that these OSes have available to them that current programmers haven't really taken advantge of much.

What does "open" really mean in this case? Symbian is changing the rules for signing apps this quarter, Windows apps are not that difficult to write and get on your phone, and with the iPhone SDK coming out in Feb, even if Apple makes a developer submit the app for approval, I don't see the advantage of another OS that us programmers will have to start writing for now.

And I doubt that the Android OS will really be that much better for programmers than the other OSes out there. For example: It only took me a weekend to walk through a coding example to write a basic game for the Symbian OS, and a few days to get the basics down for the UI and other API calls. That includes writing Internet access routines (one of the example code snippets from Nokia is a Web Server!). When I get seasoned, I think that I would be able to write most anything I want on that OS. So where will Android give me more? And many phones support Java in some for or another.

To me, I am thinking this is just a bunch of hype that helps Google get into the market, but not much substance over what is already out there. Programmers still have to write the code to do the "gee whiz" stuff that wows the consumer. I hate to say it, but that is why the iPhone is so popular now. It is not that technically better than any other, but has that "cool" factor because it is targeted at the average person, not the techie or business person. RIM, Nokia, and MS could have doen that too with their OSes, but didn't have the foresight. It was not a platform limitation (except for the multi-touch screen)

Now if I could buy any ARM 9 processor-based phone and reflash it to Android and get off and running with an unbranded, unlocked phone... now that would be something that would really mean "open" to me.... But it will still take time to get enough applications written to match what is out there for Symbian and Windows. And with the SDK for iPhone out in Feb there will be a ton of apps for that as well (since there are already a ton of them that are not sanctioned by Apple right now!)

Google may grab the attention of the masses with this announcement and maybe even the business community, but it will take convincing the developers (meaning programmers) to add another OS to their arsonal... and that will take time
Reply to this comment
Clearly you don't get it
by 00rb November 6, 2007 8:38 AM PST
This will open the flood gates for mobile computing and accelerate what people can do with cell phones/mobile devices. WiMax, broadband, GPS, file sharing, monetary transactions etc. This stuff is all very limited right now and the usablity is crap.

Somtimes when you're in the woods you can't see the trees. I think you need a compus.
View reply
I have a question
by Ricardo_NJ November 5, 2007 2:12 PM PST
Why did Cnet omit the fact the the OS will be based on Linux?
Reply to this comment
Because then it wouldn't be news.
by bob1960 November 6, 2007 4:30 PM PST
As has been said here and at other blogs, the big problem with Google's plan is that the adopters can customize the "open" software all they want. That means that most likely each provider will make their own slight variant and it will not be truly compatible with any other's. We see this trend with the carriers now, as they hobble and customize cell phones to lock a person into a contract and turn off any features they don't want to support so you don't cry foul and take your phone to another company.

All we need is a couple dozen more customized OSes out there that claim to be open and compatible. Anybody remember all the flavors of Unix that we had to live with?
Not necessarily open
by spm82 November 6, 2007 6:01 AM PST
If you read the conference call itself, during the Q&A when the question was asked if a carrier COULD release a handset with a closed version of the OS, the answer was a definitive "yes".

Given the overwhelming current trend of US carriers using proprietary technologies and closed platforms, be reminded that this announcement doesn't guarantee some kind of revolution in the way phone software is developed and distributed stateside, at least not immediately.
Reply to this comment
gPhone Picture
by joeychips November 6, 2007 11:47 AM PST
See a rare picture of the gPhone in action here
http://joechiappetta.blogspot.com/2007/11/gphone-first-look.html
Reply to this comment
And you are seeing a mirage
by bob1960 November 6, 2007 4:23 PM PST
WiMax has very little over 3G as far as speed and capability. It is just a different standard and will take time to get out there. 3G isn't really that well distributed in the US yet, by a long shot. And take a look at the drop in speeds of WiMax and 3G when the phone is actually moving...

GPS is everywhere now on cell phones. I use it al the time and have at least 3 programs to choose from on my Nokia N75.

Bluetooth, WiFi, and other apps to link cell phones to other devices is also common.

All my cell phone software purchases are done via my cell phone, and the software is pushed to the device. Writing such applications is not difficult with current cell phone OSes.

And as for the ambiguous "etc" you tossed in at the end, just take a look at Jott.com for just one idea of some really potentially powerful usage.

As for the stuff out there being crap, that is subject to opinion and not the OS's fault, but programmers that crank out apps that they can charge the low fee people seem willing to pay for cell phone apps.

Have you actually ever done much research on what is out there and how it is coded? You soundlike somebody who believes the rhetoric, but have never experienced it yourself. You should at least read more from developers and programmers about their opinions on this stuff. One such software house has already gone on record as shelfing any ideas of coding for Android at this time because there isn't expected to be any money in it. Which tends to be why small development teams make up the bulk of the cell phone software market. It is not a billion dollar industry yet. Not at most all app prices under $50, and some as low as $10. People just don't want to pay big bucks for a device they only paid a few hundred dollars for, or got their company to buy for them. The major purchasers, teens and businesses, have a very limited wish list for apps so far. Give teens music, games, messaging, and YouTube and they are happy. The iPhone's limited app list at release proves this. Businesses want solid networks, email sync, and office products. Hardly a large list to make the big software houses switch from programming for the PC.

I may miss the forest for the trees occasionally, but you are in the desert looking at a mirage.
Reply to this comment
by cristinajack August 24, 2008 10:43 PM PDT
This is really nice and helpful. google software for mobile phones wil be more secure and useful. You can protect your mobile phones through the viruses as well.
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement
Click Here