Comments on: Google unveils cell phone software and alliance
In much the same way it changed the wired Internet, Google plans to revolutionize the mobile Web through its new open software platform.
In much the same way it changed the wired Internet, Google plans to revolutionize the mobile Web through its new open software platform.
November 29, 2009 5:54 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:10 PM PST
November 29, 2009 4:09 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Will the mobile O/S just make them better at tracking everthing? They need to get something out of their O/S because free doesn't really pay the bills.
Maybe it will pull a few customers from ATT and Verizon with their increase content. But if it is not free or significantly reduced price for monthly service, there's little motivation for customers to switch.
increase content."
The iPhone has Google maps built in as an app already and on
AT&T. I have a feeling Google doesn't mind having a piece of more
than one pie at a time and wonder if those new apps will be
available for the iPhone too at some point.
shall provide users more opportunities to live vicariously through their mobile phones. In tracking the user's online actions, Google to give the 3D persona (avatar) detailed personality characteristics developed from the users real life online living experiences. Second Life's 3D avatar becomes boring and soon to be obsolete. Google is in a position to dominate & manipulate virtual life communities. Why?.... because Google's open application sources and the mobile phone is defining who you are by e-psycho-analyzing your online activities. See language in patents filed by Google...
"User dialog (e.g., from role playing games, simulation games, etc) may be used to characterize the user (e.g., literate, profane, blunt or polite, quiet etc). Also, user play may be used to characterize the user (e.g., cautious, risk-taker, aggressive, non-confrontational, stealthy, honest, cooperative, uncooperative, etc)."
Google's "open source" Android software
applications shall make the ad-supported
free mobile phone/web browser more viable and appealing to the market. Advertising shall be "less in your face & more part of your mentally." Free mobile phone and Internet services supported by something you are really interested in.
Google's "open source" Android software and the mobile phone is the foundation for the evolution of all facets of modern society's future lifestyles.
Shannon McPherson is a Bryn Mawr College student social activist that is campaigning for the use of ad-supported free mobile phone & Internet services to decrease the digital divide.
Watch the attached video clip and see if the 800lb Gorilla (that is OS/2) can be spotted!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksFqjI3gyAo
As per the subject line - Not A "Monkey" Business Alliance - Right! So, what else is new!
Google probably should've to purchase sprint or t-mobile outright and integrate their advertising knowhow into these phones in their own terms. Google can then give customers free or almost free phone service under their own terms.
Google's push into mobile world will meet another giant waiting there: Nokia, which recently acquired Navteq.
Mobile search will eventually converge to location-based features and behaviroal tracking.
Google's mobile alliance with Sprint makes sense, if they bid on 700MHz spectrum early next year.
I'm not interested in giving Big Brother Google my personal cell phone information, for their advertising database.
Google may be the 800 pound gorilla, for now, who does no evil. But mutation (business model or otherwise) has a way of putting things on its head, then what becomes of your "life history" stored at Google.
costs for everyone.
I'd never use one of these if it meant getting advertisements on my
phone, but I applaud the effort.
What does "open" really mean in this case? Symbian is changing the rules for signing apps this quarter, Windows apps are not that difficult to write and get on your phone, and with the iPhone SDK coming out in Feb, even if Apple makes a developer submit the app for approval, I don't see the advantage of another OS that us programmers will have to start writing for now.
And I doubt that the Android OS will really be that much better for programmers than the other OSes out there. For example: It only took me a weekend to walk through a coding example to write a basic game for the Symbian OS, and a few days to get the basics down for the UI and other API calls. That includes writing Internet access routines (one of the example code snippets from Nokia is a Web Server!). When I get seasoned, I think that I would be able to write most anything I want on that OS. So where will Android give me more? And many phones support Java in some for or another.
To me, I am thinking this is just a bunch of hype that helps Google get into the market, but not much substance over what is already out there. Programmers still have to write the code to do the "gee whiz" stuff that wows the consumer. I hate to say it, but that is why the iPhone is so popular now. It is not that technically better than any other, but has that "cool" factor because it is targeted at the average person, not the techie or business person. RIM, Nokia, and MS could have doen that too with their OSes, but didn't have the foresight. It was not a platform limitation (except for the multi-touch screen)
Now if I could buy any ARM 9 processor-based phone and reflash it to Android and get off and running with an unbranded, unlocked phone... now that would be something that would really mean "open" to me.... But it will still take time to get enough applications written to match what is out there for Symbian and Windows. And with the SDK for iPhone out in Feb there will be a ton of apps for that as well (since there are already a ton of them that are not sanctioned by Apple right now!)
Google may grab the attention of the masses with this announcement and maybe even the business community, but it will take convincing the developers (meaning programmers) to add another OS to their arsonal... and that will take time
Somtimes when you're in the woods you can't see the trees. I think you need a compus.
All we need is a couple dozen more customized OSes out there that claim to be open and compatible. Anybody remember all the flavors of Unix that we had to live with?
Given the overwhelming current trend of US carriers using proprietary technologies and closed platforms, be reminded that this announcement doesn't guarantee some kind of revolution in the way phone software is developed and distributed stateside, at least not immediately.
http://joechiappetta.blogspot.com/2007/11/gphone-first-look.html
GPS is everywhere now on cell phones. I use it al the time and have at least 3 programs to choose from on my Nokia N75.
Bluetooth, WiFi, and other apps to link cell phones to other devices is also common.
All my cell phone software purchases are done via my cell phone, and the software is pushed to the device. Writing such applications is not difficult with current cell phone OSes.
And as for the ambiguous "etc" you tossed in at the end, just take a look at Jott.com for just one idea of some really potentially powerful usage.
As for the stuff out there being crap, that is subject to opinion and not the OS's fault, but programmers that crank out apps that they can charge the low fee people seem willing to pay for cell phone apps.
Have you actually ever done much research on what is out there and how it is coded? You soundlike somebody who believes the rhetoric, but have never experienced it yourself. You should at least read more from developers and programmers about their opinions on this stuff. One such software house has already gone on record as shelfing any ideas of coding for Android at this time because there isn't expected to be any money in it. Which tends to be why small development teams make up the bulk of the cell phone software market. It is not a billion dollar industry yet. Not at most all app prices under $50, and some as low as $10. People just don't want to pay big bucks for a device they only paid a few hundred dollars for, or got their company to buy for them. The major purchasers, teens and businesses, have a very limited wish list for apps so far. Give teens music, games, messaging, and YouTube and they are happy. The iPhone's limited app list at release proves this. Businesses want solid networks, email sync, and office products. Hardly a large list to make the big software houses switch from programming for the PC.
I may miss the forest for the trees occasionally, but you are in the desert looking at a mirage.
- by cristinajack August 24, 2008 10:43 PM PDT
- This is really nice and helpful. google software for mobile phones wil be more secure and useful. You can protect your mobile phones through the viruses as well.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(23 Comments)