Comments on: Cingular accused of duping ex-AT&T subscribers
Lawsuit says wireless carrier degraded service, commanded fees after 2004 acquisition. Company disputes those claims.
Lawsuit says wireless carrier degraded service, commanded fees after 2004 acquisition. Company disputes those claims.
December 27, 2009 9:15 PM PST
December 27, 2009 7:45 PM PST
December 27, 2009 4:50 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
The tactics were amazing. My text messaging quit working. my voicemail indicator light quit working.
They said the only way to fix it was by getting a new Cingular sim card. Thus needing a new Cingular phone! Thus Changing my contract!
All they had to do was unlock my AT&T phone and give me the sim card if any of the BS was true.
Was unable to transfer my cell # also.
The tactics were amazing. My text messaging quit working. my voicemail indicator light quit working.
They said the only way to fix it was by getting a new Cingular sim card. Thus needing a new Cingular phone! Thus Changing my contract!
All they had to do was unlock my AT&T phone and give me the sim card if any of the BS was true.
Was unable to transfer my cell # also.
company (was that Celllar One?) became part of them and next
thing I know, at contract renewal they're trying to charge extra
for voice mail. That was a number of years back now, but as a
consumer I don't forget.
So, at contract renewal, I dropped them.
They strike me as one of those companies that nickle and dime
their customers. With that in mind, hearing them accused of
this doesn't shock me, though I know they're innocent until
proven guilty.
Charles Whealton
Chuck Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
company (was that Celllar One?) became part of them and next
thing I know, at contract renewal they're trying to charge extra
for voice mail. That was a number of years back now, but as a
consumer I don't forget.
So, at contract renewal, I dropped them.
They strike me as one of those companies that nickle and dime
their customers. With that in mind, hearing them accused of
this doesn't shock me, though I know they're innocent until
proven guilty.
Charles Whealton
Chuck Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
My phones batteries started to give out and a co-worker was nice enough to give me his brand new Cingular phone (LGC1500) when he replaced it with a TREO. All I need to do is have the LGC1500 unlocked to use my ATT sim chip. This would have been seamless, however Cingular refused to supply the unlock code. Cingular kept saying the ATT sim chip would not work in a Cingular phone or on their network. My co-worker and placed the ATT sim chip into his unlocked Cingular TREO and made a phone call, it worked great.
Finally after making many calls to Cingular and explaining the chip would work and had been verified to work, Cingular said they would send in an application for the unlock code, this happened about 3 times, each time I was denied without notification. I even looked up their corporate office found at www.sec.gov on their SEC filings. I talked to someone in their headquarters, they told me the same lies, except this time they blamed it on ATT. They said I had to get the unlock code from ATT.
After a dozen+ calls to Cingular and a couple dozen dropped calls in the process I gave up and agreed to switch to Cingular, I was very unhappy, the phone they sent me kept locking up, They sent me another phone, it also locked up. I canceled the service, sent the phones back and they tried to bill me an early termination fee. I explained to them I didn?t sign any contract and they could shove it, finally they agreed to just cancel the account and refund $20.39 I didn?t use. The next billing cycle I found another bill from them using the $20.39 to towards a reconnect fee. I called Cingular to find out what the bill was since I didn?t even have a cell phone anymore. Cingular tried to charge me rental on the phones and $0.02 for internet service I didn?t have.
I believe the FTC should be taking a VERY close look at this company with a fine tooth comb. The fine is about 1/100 of what it should have been.
I also believe a cell phone should NOT have a lock on it. Once you receive a phone it?s yours to use on any compatible network you choose sign up for.
I beg the FTC and any Governmental agency that regulates these companies to look into this much further, including the practice of locking a customer?s personal phone to their own network.
My phones batteries started to give out and a co-worker was nice enough to give me his brand new Cingular phone (LGC1500) when he replaced it with a TREO. All I need to do is have the LGC1500 unlocked to use my ATT sim chip. This would have been seamless, however Cingular refused to supply the unlock code. Cingular kept saying the ATT sim chip would not work in a Cingular phone or on their network. My co-worker and placed the ATT sim chip into his unlocked Cingular TREO and made a phone call, it worked great.
Finally after making many calls to Cingular and explaining the chip would work and had been verified to work, Cingular said they would send in an application for the unlock code, this happened about 3 times, each time I was denied without notification. I even looked up their corporate office found at www.sec.gov on their SEC filings. I talked to someone in their headquarters, they told me the same lies, except this time they blamed it on ATT. They said I had to get the unlock code from ATT.
After a dozen+ calls to Cingular and a couple dozen dropped calls in the process I gave up and agreed to switch to Cingular, I was very unhappy, the phone they sent me kept locking up, They sent me another phone, it also locked up. I canceled the service, sent the phones back and they tried to bill me an early termination fee. I explained to them I didn?t sign any contract and they could shove it, finally they agreed to just cancel the account and refund $20.39 I didn?t use. The next billing cycle I found another bill from them using the $20.39 to towards a reconnect fee. I called Cingular to find out what the bill was since I didn?t even have a cell phone anymore. Cingular tried to charge me rental on the phones and $0.02 for internet service I didn?t have.
I believe the FTC should be taking a VERY close look at this company with a fine tooth comb. The fine is about 1/100 of what it should have been.
I also believe a cell phone should NOT have a lock on it. Once you receive a phone it?s yours to use on any compatible network you choose sign up for.
I beg the FTC and any Governmental agency that regulates these companies to look into this much further, including the practice of locking a customer?s personal phone to their own network.
about the service, I have close friends who were long time AT&T
clients and after the merge the were slammed with those
ridiculous charges, fees, poor calling service and the buy a new
cingular phone crap.
I felt really bad for them, but since I was signed up with a phone
and a line as a b-day present, I had to stick with it.
Nevertheless, what Cingular did to my friends and others was a
scam to make money and they should pay back.
about the service, I have close friends who were long time AT&T
clients and after the merge the were slammed with those
ridiculous charges, fees, poor calling service and the buy a new
cingular phone crap.
I felt really bad for them, but since I was signed up with a phone
and a line as a b-day present, I had to stick with it.
Nevertheless, what Cingular did to my friends and others was a
scam to make money and they should pay back.
- HIGHWAY ROBBERY
- by jcgotthardt July 9, 2006 1:15 PM PDT
- CINGULAR INFORMED ME THAT THEY DID NOT OFFER THE SAME CONTRACT THAT AT&T OFFERED, THEREFORE I HAD TO UPGRADE FOR $10.00 MORE A MONTH FOR 2 YRS FOR 2 CONTRACTS. 4 MONTHS PRIOR TO MY EXPIRATION DATE, CINGULAR THEN INFORMED ME THAT THEY WERE CLOSING THEIR LAST CONTRACT AND IT WOULD INCREASE $10.00 MORE FOR BOTH ACCOUNTS. HOUSTON TEXAN.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 3 pages (66 Comments)