Comments on: Protective parents: Gold for cellular services?
Disney's new mobile phone service for kids and their parents highlights an important market for the cell phone industry.
Disney's new mobile phone service for kids and their parents highlights an important market for the cell phone industry.
December 28, 2009 6:10 PM PST
December 28, 2009 6:00 PM PST
December 28, 2009 2:39 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Never mind the fact that the overwhelming majority of child rapists and murderers are members of the victims' own families, we are constantly fed a diet of horror stories about the boogyman lurking just outside the school gates or just at the other end of a Net connection.
Child abduction by strangers remains a small percentage of overall crimes against children, yet society spends an inordinate amount of time obsessing about it. As a result, over the past 20 years, the way children are treated has changed out of all recognition. Many are barely allowed out of the house. They are ferried to and from school in tank-like SUVs. They are watched intently for signs of 'aberrant' behaviour and, if they demonstrate any sign of rebellion, are whisked off to the doc or shrink for Ritalin or counselling. Now, we're devising ways of electronically tagging them as if they were household pets.
What does the future hold for these pampered, overindulged, henpecked and largely sedentary children. According to most of the studies I've seen, an early death from diabetes, heart disease and the other side effects of obesity and inactivity. One study predicts that, by 2020, 33% of the population will have Type II diabetes. It is likely that life expectancy will begin to decline as well, for the first time since records began (excluding wartime).
I predict that we'll also see a dramatic upturn in mental illness, as the little princes/princesses are turned loose on an uncaring world with which they are ill-equipped to cope. This may partly explain why so many young people are still living with mom and dad in their late 20s and early 30s: they simply don't know how to take care of themselves.
So we spend money on technologies to reduce the 0.001% chance that junior will be harmed by a sexual predetor, yet we subject our children to a lifestyle that will increase their liklihood of an early death by 20 or 30%.
Brilliant thinking.
Never mind the fact that the overwhelming majority of child rapists and murderers are members of the victims' own families, we are constantly fed a diet of horror stories about the boogyman lurking just outside the school gates or just at the other end of a Net connection.
Child abduction by strangers remains a small percentage of overall crimes against children, yet society spends an inordinate amount of time obsessing about it. As a result, over the past 20 years, the way children are treated has changed out of all recognition. Many are barely allowed out of the house. They are ferried to and from school in tank-like SUVs. They are watched intently for signs of 'aberrant' behaviour and, if they demonstrate any sign of rebellion, are whisked off to the doc or shrink for Ritalin or counselling. Now, we're devising ways of electronically tagging them as if they were household pets.
What does the future hold for these pampered, overindulged, henpecked and largely sedentary children. According to most of the studies I've seen, an early death from diabetes, heart disease and the other side effects of obesity and inactivity. One study predicts that, by 2020, 33% of the population will have Type II diabetes. It is likely that life expectancy will begin to decline as well, for the first time since records began (excluding wartime).
I predict that we'll also see a dramatic upturn in mental illness, as the little princes/princesses are turned loose on an uncaring world with which they are ill-equipped to cope. This may partly explain why so many young people are still living with mom and dad in their late 20s and early 30s: they simply don't know how to take care of themselves.
So we spend money on technologies to reduce the 0.001% chance that junior will be harmed by a sexual predetor, yet we subject our children to a lifestyle that will increase their liklihood of an early death by 20 or 30%.
Brilliant thinking.
The TalkPlus guys build enhanced mobile services for MNOs and MVNOs, so, Disney's new "uniqueness" is about to dissapear as the big boys rollout consumer services that go way beyond Disney Mobile's offering.
If I remember correctly, they are about to go live soon...
Lastly, doesn't TCS or AirFlash own the patents on LBS services related to finding people with dual notification when searching?
If Disney is going to be successful here, it will be due to their BRAND NAME, not some generic services that everyone will have via a FREE download in less than six months...
The TalkPlus guys build enhanced mobile services for MNOs and MVNOs, so, Disney's new "uniqueness" is about to dissapear as the big boys rollout consumer services that go way beyond Disney Mobile's offering.
If I remember correctly, they are about to go live soon...
Lastly, doesn't TCS or AirFlash own the patents on LBS services related to finding people with dual notification when searching?
If Disney is going to be successful here, it will be due to their BRAND NAME, not some generic services that everyone will have via a FREE download in less than six months...
Obesity and health/mental issues is a convoluted justification for why NOT to have parental control over cell phone usage by kids!
The reason why such services exist is to allow your kids to have the freedom that they need by providing parents with a 'tool' to track/monitor a child's whereabouts.
So in fact, this solves your complaint of kids growing obese by being chauffered around in "tank-like SUVs" - They no longer have to be as parents can be rest-assured that they'd be notified if the kid is in danger.
BTW life has changed significantly over the past 20 years with advancements in technology making it **extremely** easy for kids to get in contact with the wrong person, so its not reasonable to compare (in absolute terms) the way kids were and are brought up.I think parents have SOME justification to be "frightened neurotics" as their kids are more vulnerable. This may be a small percentage of crimes agains kids,but its fast growing.
p.s: I'm not a parent...Just my 2cents on why this is service is potentially useful.
Obesity and health/mental issues is a convoluted justification for why NOT to have parental control over cell phone usage by kids!
The reason why such services exist is to allow your kids to have the freedom that they need by providing parents with a 'tool' to track/monitor a child's whereabouts.
So in fact, this solves your complaint of kids growing obese by being chauffered around in "tank-like SUVs" - They no longer have to be as parents can be rest-assured that they'd be notified if the kid is in danger.
BTW life has changed significantly over the past 20 years with advancements in technology making it **extremely** easy for kids to get in contact with the wrong person, so its not reasonable to compare (in absolute terms) the way kids were and are brought up.I think parents have SOME justification to be "frightened neurotics" as their kids are more vulnerable. This may be a small percentage of crimes agains kids,but its fast growing.
p.s: I'm not a parent...Just my 2cents on why this is service is potentially useful.
the features I wanted: controlling when the phone could be
used, how many messages could be sent, even being able to
locate my teen (which I used once and was very useful).
From the start there were problems - anyone with blocked caller
ID could call in. The calls could go over the preset limit. Since
the current usage itemization isn't available, you have to wait
until the next bill to explain to your kid why she is over limits.
Disney Mobile blamed these problems on their piggy back
service provider (which is Sprint).
Then they upgraded the Call Control scheduler, but it doesn't
work. You set it up, save it, it says OK online, but the phone is
not restricted.
When they upgraded Call Control, my daughter was no longer
able to see her usage on her phone, so she is unrestricted and
has no idea she's over her limit. Gets expensive at 10 cents a
message. So tech control tells me they're "working on it."
So the phone has become a real pain - the $175 early
termination fee seems like a bargain compared to being on hold
with tech control only to be told they're working on it.
Your experience may vary.
the features I wanted: controlling when the phone could be
used, how many messages could be sent, even being able to
locate my teen (which I used once and was very useful).
From the start there were problems - anyone with blocked caller
ID could call in. The calls could go over the preset limit. Since
the current usage itemization isn't available, you have to wait
until the next bill to explain to your kid why she is over limits.
Disney Mobile blamed these problems on their piggy back
service provider (which is Sprint).
Then they upgraded the Call Control scheduler, but it doesn't
work. You set it up, save it, it says OK online, but the phone is
not restricted.
When they upgraded Call Control, my daughter was no longer
able to see her usage on her phone, so she is unrestricted and
has no idea she's over her limit. Gets expensive at 10 cents a
message. So tech control tells me they're "working on it."
So the phone has become a real pain - the $175 early
termination fee seems like a bargain compared to being on hold
with tech control only to be told they're working on it.
Your experience may vary.
- by raindog1992 September 15, 2008 5:06 PM PDT
- I think until you have a teenager, who is about to begin driving with mental illness, it would be difficult for you to describe using these features as convoluted justification. My daughters illness, emerging bipolar, has the potential for her to make risky choices she wouldnt normally make. In fact the tracking feature was suggested by her shrink.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(11 Comments)