Comments on: I want my BlackBerry
Attorney Eric Sinrod hopes that the courts won't take away his PDA. If they do, will he and others flock to RIM competitors?
Attorney Eric Sinrod hopes that the courts won't take away his PDA. If they do, will he and others flock to RIM competitors?
December 4, 2009 2:47 PM PST
December 4, 2009 2:23 PM PST
December 4, 2009 2:05 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
It seems to me all one needs is a wireless device capable of running general purpose software (written to use the available hardware) with TCP/IP connection to the internet. Then one could install an IMAP client and use any email account with any provider that allows IMAP access.
A general purpose device would not make one depend on one particular kind of device/service provider. The technology would not be encumbered by patents (I hope using SMTP+IMAP4 over TCP/IP is not patented...) and of course a general purpose device would allow the independent development of lots of other uses for a wireless communications device without it being dependent on the device being "wireless" - instead just on its being connected to a TCP/IP network.
Or am I completely wrong? Perhaps any particular combination of methods used at the seven different layers of the OSI model are separtely patentable?
but i think RIM and the wireless network providers do a little more to make it look like TCP/IP to the devices (hence NTP)... although i still think it's not worth patenting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3G
../GPRS
../IDEN
../RMI
etc
- broad meaningless patents
- by Sonicsands December 7, 2005 4:22 PM PST
- This is sadly another case of someone allowed to hold a true invention hostage by applying for a broad meaningless patent.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)Why did NTP not make their case strongly until Blackberry became a profitable product?
Nowhere in the NTP patent is there an explicit description of what the Blackberry does - just general, vague suggestions of wireless data transmission.
The US patent system really needs major overhauling. I applaud RIM for not bowing to this. If the service is shut down, it is the fault of NTP and that of the US patent system.