Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon

Comments on: I want my BlackBerry

Attorney Eric Sinrod hopes that the courts won't take away his PDA. If they do, will he and others flock to RIM competitors?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Any need for speacial technology for "wireless" email?
by hadaso December 7, 2005 5:10 AM PST
I don't understand why there's a need for proprietary technology to "deliver email to a wireless device".

It seems to me all one needs is a wireless device capable of running general purpose software (written to use the available hardware) with TCP/IP connection to the internet. Then one could install an IMAP client and use any email account with any provider that allows IMAP access.

A general purpose device would not make one depend on one particular kind of device/service provider. The technology would not be encumbered by patents (I hope using SMTP+IMAP4 over TCP/IP is not patented...) and of course a general purpose device would allow the independent development of lots of other uses for a wireless communications device without it being dependent on the device being "wireless" - instead just on its being connected to a TCP/IP network.

Or am I completely wrong? Perhaps any particular combination of methods used at the seven different layers of the OSI model are separtely patentable?
Reply to this comment
SMTP+IMAP4 over TCP/IP
by December 7, 2005 8:28 AM PST
from the software point of view yes

but i think RIM and the wireless network providers do a little more to make it look like TCP/IP to the devices (hence NTP)... although i still think it's not worth patenting...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3G
../GPRS
../IDEN
../RMI


etc
View reply
broad meaningless patents
by Sonicsands December 7, 2005 4:22 PM PST
This is sadly another case of someone allowed to hold a true invention hostage by applying for a broad meaningless patent.

Why did NTP not make their case strongly until Blackberry became a profitable product?

Nowhere in the NTP patent is there an explicit description of what the Blackberry does - just general, vague suggestions of wireless data transmission.

The US patent system really needs major overhauling. I applaud RIM for not bowing to this. If the service is shut down, it is the fault of NTP and that of the US patent system.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement