Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Are wireless gamers cheapskates?

Or are they just not that serious about the pastime? A new report casts doubt on whether they're likely to shell out for mobile diversions.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Cell Phones are not Game Platforms
by jacomo August 17, 2005 12:42 PM PDT
They will never pay for any game that can be played on Cell Phones small screens and limited CPU power and narrowband links. When the industry finally starts mass producing the PDA like Personal Communicator with a great screen (size is key), WiFi and Blue Tooth and plenty of processing the game makers like EA will publish games that a provider can charge for.
The new Wireless Mesh Networks being deployed or specified in metro markets today will finally open up this market and allow 5-10Mbps P2P and Multiplayer Gaming. They will also allow full VoiceIP comm and Interactive low latency gaming on line.

Jacomo
Reply to this comment
An interesting question
by Christopher Hall August 17, 2005 12:42 PM PDT
I've been playing games on various media for well over twenty years, so what's on my cell phone?

Gradius.

When all else fails, I can boot up Gradius, play for a few minutes, and be done with it. Of course, I have the currently available handheld devices, but not all situations warrant booting up Metal Gear AC!D or Meteos. However, it's worth mentioning that I haven't played my phone in months.

Cell phone gamers are not gamers. They merely boot up the program to pass the time. People who spend that much time on their cell phone tend to be extremely fickle, fidgety, and require high amounts of stimulation to keep boredom at bay. Me? I'm quite content listening to the sounds in my head.
Reply to this comment
My Reason is Retalliation
by duerra August 17, 2005 2:17 PM PDT
The reason I don't purchase games on my cell phone is because I'm tired of being raped from every single direction by cell phone companies. It used to be that when you bought a phone you would get a couple free games (even if they were just basic games), a few free backgrounds, and a nice assortment of ring tones.

With my new phone, I got *zero* complete games - everything installed on the phone was a 2-minute demo version that requires you pay for the full game. My ringtone selection is miserably small, and forget about backgrounds.

It seems that Sprint has every intention of giving me absolutely nothing on my new phone and instead forcing me to pay for every last penny I'm worth? The icing? I paid $350 for my phone. My last phone came with 3 games, and a great selection of ring tones, and cost me nothing - I got it free with my service. Once cell phones got the ability to connect to the internet, however, apparently that all went down the drain.

Cell phone companies have done a mighty good job of pissing me off lately. I can't even stand to read this article's suggestion that it's the consumers who are at fault here.
Reply to this comment
A Cell Phone Is . . .
by markdoiron August 17, 2005 3:05 PM PDT
. . . a telephone without wires. start with that basic concept and maybe one can understand that most folks (but obviously not all) have better things to do with their money than send it to the cell phone company for anything other than to talk to someone else.

mark d.
Reply to this comment
How about this alternate title?
by August 19, 2005 11:00 PM PDT
"Are Cell Phone Companies' Revenue Projections Hilariously Naive?"
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement