Comments on: Teens dialing up ring tone trouble
Parents shocked at ring tone bills seek an answer from carriers, who respond with a crackdown on independent ring tone sellers.
Parents shocked at ring tone bills seek an answer from carriers, who respond with a crackdown on independent ring tone sellers.
January 4, 2010 8:25 PM PST
January 4, 2010 7:20 PM PST
January 4, 2010 7:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Thankfully it's not true, thanks to cables that can be had for under $10 on eBay and software that is frequently free you can create and upload unlimited ringtones to your phone without paying your carrier a penny.
All of my ringtones (and I have more than a few for different callers) are simply trimmed and low bitrate clips of MP3s ripped from my CD collection. Nor do I pay to get camera phone images out of the phone.
I'm not going to name products specifically because I don't want to seem like a shill, but if you search around you can find the solution to overpriced ringtones.
I don't really see what the big deal is about the ring tones. I use the standard rings that come with the phone.
It's the 900-number boom of the early 90s all over again.
I just noticed Ivan Yagolnikov posted a comment about setting phones to vibrate, and used "Easy Solution" as his subject title. I agree our phones should be on vibrate, as I use mine, but that doesn't mean other people don't have reasons to use ring tones, and this wouldn't be an easy solution for parents at all that I can see.
While trying to conclude my statment I have nothing to say other than I completely agree with you. Who didn't see this coming?
The solution for kids (and teens) (and seniors) and anyone else who wants a simple mobile phone without hassle and bills - is PREPAID!
Virgin Mobile USA or T-Mobile To Go if you want lots of minutes cheaply.
TracFone if you need a large roaming coverage area and don't mind paying a bit more.
Verizon INpulse and Cingular if you want unlimited mobile to mobile calls included.
My Son's (age 23) girlfriend thought she would surprise him with a ringtone from a favorite song, only to notice later that it was a weekly charge, and was difficult to get out of, these tricksters should be ashamed at the target audience of these scam artists. I have since made him a few dozen he can upload into his phone for free (from personal music files).
W Lennon
the carriers (I hold Verizon and the others responsible) have allow this service to bilk parents. In one month I had over $40 in charges for ringtones. This included two subscriptions (a premium and a basic) running concurrently. If you were to price a CD based on the ringtone pricing model, that CD would cost you near $60. Bought a $60 CD lately? Verizon and the other should be ashamed of putting the screws to parents.
Teenagers need a cell phone like a fish needs a bicycle. All they do is use them like expensive walkie-talkies. As another post noted, remember the $1,000+ charges that kids were getting for 900 numbers in the 80's and 90's? That is, until parents got fed up and began monitoring their children.
Still, I don't understand what's the big deal about ringtones? People should get some sense and just keep their phones on vibrate! I attend a large university and it bugs me to no end when people forget to turn their phones off and some cheesy tune plays (even during exams). Keeping phone on vibrate or silent (for movies) should be a common courtesy that we too often forgo...
Just messin' with ya. You're point is dead on.
But, the carriers should be shouldering immense blame for not providing parental control capabilities akin to AOL, cable television, and other services. Parents should be able to ask the carrier to BLOCK any purchase of any type that would appear on the phone bill beyond basic service. Parents should also be able to prevent their kids from continuing to use their phone if they go over the allotted minutes per month. And, if the kid abuses text messaging, parents should be able to disable that feature as well. Cell phones are a great tool for parents to keep up with their kids and give them a lifeline if they are ever in trouble or in an emergency. But, that tool should be controllable by those parents.
I've looked at Jamster's ads and I don't see anything that can be misinterpreted the way these people claim it was misinterpreted. They are just trying to shuffle blame to the technology that's the newest (funny how we tend to do that in general :)). The carriers are totally trying to shirk blame away from providing the parental control features they need to and CAN provide. If they can provide freakin' full motion video on a cell phone, they can provide the controls to block functionality like this that is ripe for abuse and their kids don't really need.
carriers start offering online music for their cell phones for
$2.99 per track? I can't wait to see that flop. I'm quite content
with my Sony MP3 player, thank you.
Cell phones are such rip offs anyway. Peoples' justification? "I
need it for emergency purposes." Yeah, right. You need it to call
911 for running into the back of an innocent driver while you
were running your mouth on the cell phone.
Parents are responsible for their kids and they need to lock-down the cell phone usage. No different than kids accessing the Internet or going out with their friends to 4AM ... parents need to do their job as parents.
--GIF
- Read the fine line
- by james.grimes July 21, 2005 8:26 AM PDT
- Parents, you should be telling your kids that they should be reading the fine print because just because a commercial says something is free, it doesn't mean that it is totally free--beides there is no such thing as a free lunch, you have to qualify for it first, and then apply.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(31 Comments)