Version: 2008
  • On UrbanBaby: I won't vaccinate my daughter!

Comments on: Amazon snaps up Digital Photography Review

Online marketplace reveals neither financial terms nor plans for the straight-talking camera review and news site.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
What about Steve's Digicams?
by verucabong May 14, 2007 8:15 AM PDT
I'd say Steve's Digicams is just as good (if not better) than DP Review. DP Review's not really the authoritative source if you ask me...
Reply to this comment
Different target audiences
by chibimike May 14, 2007 1:07 PM PDT
Steve's is a fine site but is more geared to beginners and casual users. It was my site of choice when I just got into digital photography.

DPReview has much more technical, in-depth reviews that cover subjects that serious amateurs and professionals prefer.
Just great
by tdlucas May 14, 2007 10:21 AM PDT
There goes DPReview, down the tubes.
I loved that site. Now it's gonna be
biased and full BS. Stupid Amazon,
they should stick to selling things.
Reply to this comment
It is great, Amazon is focused
by songzhuang May 15, 2007 1:08 PM PDT
I would submit to you that this is exactly waht Amazon has done - stuck to selling things. They are turning to authorities in the field (like dpreview) for the reviews. I love dpreview and will continue to do so as long as they let the crew do their thing.
View reply
DPReview.com: Comprehensive, but Biased
by aaydogan May 14, 2007 9:14 PM PDT
I've used dpreview.com for years and found Phil's coverage of
the digital photography industry to exhaustive and
comprehensive. In his reviews, though, I have always detected
what I feel is a bias towards Nikon and Canon and against Fuji in
one critical area: flesh tone reproduction. In virtually every
review of a Canon or Nikon product, the sample photos almost
never contain any humans, just scenery or objects. Yet, almost
every Fuji camera review contains multiple images of humans.
As a portrait photographer, the reproduciton of skin tone is a
critical factor in my choice of eqiupment. Canon cameras,
especially at the very high end of the line have terrible skin tone
reproduction and require extensive post production
manipulation. In general, even cheap Fuji "pocket" cameras do a
better job. I wish that Phil's otherwise excellent reviews
reflected this information.

Congratulations to Phil for successfully turning a hobby into a
lucrative sale.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement