Comments on: Amazon snaps up Digital Photography Review
Online marketplace reveals neither financial terms nor plans for the straight-talking camera review and news site.
Online marketplace reveals neither financial terms nor plans for the straight-talking camera review and news site.
December 4, 2009 7:16 AM PST
December 4, 2009 7:02 AM PST
December 4, 2009 6:57 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
DPReview has much more technical, in-depth reviews that cover subjects that serious amateurs and professionals prefer.
I loved that site. Now it's gonna be
biased and full BS. Stupid Amazon,
they should stick to selling things.
- DPReview.com: Comprehensive, but Biased
- by aaydogan May 14, 2007 9:14 PM PDT
- I've used dpreview.com for years and found Phil's coverage of
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)the digital photography industry to exhaustive and
comprehensive. In his reviews, though, I have always detected
what I feel is a bias towards Nikon and Canon and against Fuji in
one critical area: flesh tone reproduction. In virtually every
review of a Canon or Nikon product, the sample photos almost
never contain any humans, just scenery or objects. Yet, almost
every Fuji camera review contains multiple images of humans.
As a portrait photographer, the reproduciton of skin tone is a
critical factor in my choice of eqiupment. Canon cameras,
especially at the very high end of the line have terrible skin tone
reproduction and require extensive post production
manipulation. In general, even cheap Fuji "pocket" cameras do a
better job. I wish that Phil's otherwise excellent reviews
reflected this information.
Congratulations to Phil for successfully turning a hobby into a
lucrative sale.