Comments on: Google rises at Yahoo's expense

Two years ago, the biggest search companies were about the same size. Now Google is twice as large and growing fast. What happened?

[rexworld]

It's an unfair fight

In many ways this is an unfair fight, for the very reasons you mention in the article--Yahoo thinks of itself as a media company, not a technology company. Unfortunately for them, search advertising is more of a technology business than a media business. At least for now, and the forseeable future.

Ultimately though there is room for both companies to grow and prosper. Yahoo just needs to double-down on being a great media company with good technology, rather than trying to become a great technology company that can challenge Google's dominance.

[fellowshipofone]

Poor analysis

This article looks like a very poor analysis of the current market, but it is a good description.

Assuming nothing will change in the way Internet is used for business, the author is right, but let's try to learn our lessons here!

Google's business model is extremely week and only depends on their capacity to offer the illusion of the best search results. If the Internet evolves toward different content or different interfaces (Mobile?), Yahoo! could take advantage of its portal and media approach.

Just look at how Yahoo! News and Yahoo! Go succeed. Google does not stand a chance and I am betting on it!

[virtman]

Bad CEO choice

Terry Semel is a smart guy, but he is not the best CEO for a technology company. Yahoo founder shouldn't have hired him at the first place. They needed some one who understands the technology pretty well, not a media guru. It was quite natural that Semel tried to build a media empire out of Yahoo. I am sure Semel is a great guy, but is not a guy who understand technology (he hadn't sent an email in his life before joining Yahoo).

It's not end of life for Yahoo, they need to move a much faster rate in becoming a true technology company. They are not doing bad as a media company, but if they want to stay as a media company they should forget about winning the race with Google.

[t8]

Go Google

They deserve their success because they innovate.

[mr. cynical]

Whatever.

Give it a few more years and more dominance and people will pick another new toy to "challenge" the system.

[mr. cynical]

Whatever.

Give it a few more years and more dominance and people will pick another new toy to "challenge" the system.

[ismetd]

Inspiring Googleplex Factor?

i was in silicon valley few weeks ago, visited googleplex the Google HQ, i was impressed. the secluded green environment, 1-2 story buildings hidden away within forest of green trees and flowery gardens, then i paused for a moment, i said to myself, 'man! i can work in this place for free'. i was inspired, place makes you feel good. now thinking back, i say 'no wander! so successful google is.'

that day i also saw yahoo's failure, scattered multi-story buildings that looked so yesteryears', uninspiring.

i suspect people go to work at yahoo 'just to have a work' and people go to work at google to do something.

that makes all the difference between success and failure.

[mattofasia]

a new topic -architectural design and the desire to actually work

this is something worth looking into.
some research is worth doing.

maybe one day we can all have better designed more pleasurable places to create in, rather than boxes for drones to stagnate within.

alas, I have yet to see googles complex. I am just a mere cog in one of the boxes out in Asia... but without the base of box to begin from, where would evolution of architecture be?