Comments on: Cisco faces iPhone trademark challenge in Canada
As Cisco battles Apple for the iPhone trademark, telecommunications company alleges Cisco is stepping on its use of the brand.
As Cisco battles Apple for the iPhone trademark, telecommunications company alleges Cisco is stepping on its use of the brand.
November 27, 2009 1:05 PM PST
November 27, 2009 11:52 AM PST
November 27, 2009 10:30 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Found the Comwave site and one other. As well as an article by a college student.
The bottom line...
Cisco can loose the trademark because they didn't try to protect it.
And the courts can decide that no one can have the trademark.
Can you say Kleenex?
The most likely scenario is Cisco will settle with Comwave for the rights to use the name in Canada.
It's bad news for Apple, because they now have to fight (or make deals) with both Cisco *and* Comwave, in the US and in Canada.
Didn't Apple research the name before deciding to use it? Unlike in Canada, iphone is a registered trademark in the US, and has been so for over a decade.
The article says it may take up to two years for this to be resolved, which will definitely eliminate Apple's ability to sell the product in Canada until this is resolved. If they do try to sell the iPhone in Canada, then Comwave can sue Apple for all sales made in that country plus damages. This could be very very expensive for Apple if they continue this path of self destruction.
- Surely it's a generic term by now, so...
- by dotmike January 26, 2007 7:04 PM PST
- ... let all companies that are using it (about a dozen), just keep
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(9 Comments)using it.
To distinguish them from each other, they and new publications
can just say the Apple iPhone or the Cisco iPhone or the Comwave
iPhone or the Cidco iPhone, etc, etc.