Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks

Comments on: Cisco faces iPhone trademark challenge in Canada

As Cisco battles Apple for the iPhone trademark, telecommunications company alleges Cisco is stepping on its use of the brand.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
iPhone?
by airwalkery2k January 26, 2007 3:10 PM PST
I thought about the name iPhone in at least 2003. Do I get something too?
Reply to this comment
Dont be a twit....
by dargon19888 January 26, 2007 3:29 PM PST
When this first errupted, I did a quick google search on the term iPhone and not Apple.

Found the Comwave site and one other. As well as an article by a college student.

The bottom line...

Cisco can loose the trademark because they didn't try to protect it.

And the courts can decide that no one can have the trademark.

Can you say Kleenex?
View all 3 replies
Just call it iNewtonphone -grin (nt)
by john55440 January 26, 2007 3:37 PM PST
No Text
Reply to this comment
VERY unlikely...
by mbenedict January 26, 2007 5:34 PM PST
The worse that could happen is Cisco to lose the iPhone trademark *in Canada* only. As the article mentions, Comwave had not registered the trademark in Canada or elsewhere.

The most likely scenario is Cisco will settle with Comwave for the rights to use the name in Canada.

It's bad news for Apple, because they now have to fight (or make deals) with both Cisco *and* Comwave, in the US and in Canada.

Didn't Apple research the name before deciding to use it? Unlike in Canada, iphone is a registered trademark in the US, and has been so for over a decade.
Reply to this comment
Apple is now third in line for the name
by Vegaman_Dan January 26, 2007 7:12 PM PST
So... Apple will now have to fight Cisco and Comwave to use the name they have decided to steal from two other companies.

The article says it may take up to two years for this to be resolved, which will definitely eliminate Apple's ability to sell the product in Canada until this is resolved. If they do try to sell the iPhone in Canada, then Comwave can sue Apple for all sales made in that country plus damages. This could be very very expensive for Apple if they continue this path of self destruction.
Surely it's a generic term by now, so...
by dotmike January 26, 2007 7:04 PM PST
... let all companies that are using it (about a dozen), just keep
using it.

To distinguish them from each other, they and new publications
can just say the Apple iPhone or the Cisco iPhone or the Comwave
iPhone or the Cidco iPhone, etc, etc.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement