Comments on: Verizon Wireless settles early-termination suit
Verizon Wireless agrees to pay $21 million to settle a case filed by customers who claim the company's early termination fees are excessive and unfair.
Verizon Wireless agrees to pay $21 million to settle a case filed by customers who claim the company's early termination fees are excessive and unfair.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The customer knew what the costs were going in, and when they received a telephone or other equipment at a discounted rate or even for free - there was a cost associated with that instrument, and subsequently the need for the early termination clause and subsequent fees.
As to the comments regarding the FCC - frankly, it would be best if government would just get out of our business altogether and let the "Free Enterprise" system float on it's own. Just another frivolous lawsuit and ultimately - we will all pay.
Grow up and accept responsibility for what you agreed to do in the first place.
for being unfairly compared with T-Mobile.
I don't know what planet some of you are living on, but here on Earth, dropped calls, bad/poor/unavailable service is just part of the norm with the cell industry. Nobody I know is "happy" with their cell phone service. Everybody has a horror story.
If my cell phone can get a message that I have voice mail, why can't the original call come through?
That, and the fact that customer service, like most service providers, is non-existent for the most part.
If the service was better across the board for ALL carriers, you'd see a lot less of disenfranchised users looking to to get out of a contract that has them paying for a service they cannot use.
Freemarket Economy? Baby, I want to own a company where you have to pay a monthly fee for at best mediocre service, then have the ability to supercharge you a fee when you have the audacity to want to get out of the contract.
Until service companies start providing a SERVICE, it's all about GREED.
They ALL suck. Period!
- by ChelleT18 July 23, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
- It's funy how so many of you want to do the cry baby thing...but how you can get crappy service in your area adhere to the two years, transfer your service then have them tell you but we extended it for two months because you made a change or upgrade to the service....BS I got screwed on that and wish I had not missed out on the lawsuit!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)