Version: 2008

Comments on: Verizon Wireless settles early-termination suit

Verizon Wireless agrees to pay $21 million to settle a case filed by customers who claim the company's early termination fees are excessive and unfair.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ondichmn88 July 10, 2008 10:26 PM PDT
I think the settlement is another backdoor for Verizon to continue their unfair cancellation fee. It just shows the tech industry is too unregulated. I wish the FCC would do its job instead we have a regulatory agencies in Washington,DC like the FCC that are puppets for corporations and lobbyists.
Reply to this comment
by ondichmn88 July 10, 2008 10:27 PM PDT
I think the settlement is another backdoor for Verizon to continue their unfair cancellation fee. It just shows the tech industry is too unregulated. I wish the FCC would do its job instead we have a regulatory agencies in Washington,DC like the FCC that are puppets for corporations and lobbyists.
Reply to this comment
by mastergen July 10, 2008 11:00 PM PDT
good news )>
Reply to this comment
by jmoraine July 11, 2008 12:53 AM PDT
From a personal standpoint, I have used the services of Verizon (and their predecessor) for over a decade and find what they offer - the best service available. Too many subscribers today are turned on by shiny new colors, tv's in their palm, and a series of new whistles and bells offered by other service providers, and thereby feel no responsibility toward their original contract, and what they agreed upon, when signing the contract. Result: They feel no obligation to pay the bill. Each of the subscribers, who terminated their contracts early, got what they agreed to when they signed up - an early termination fee.

The customer knew what the costs were going in, and when they received a telephone or other equipment at a discounted rate or even for free - there was a cost associated with that instrument, and subsequently the need for the early termination clause and subsequent fees.

As to the comments regarding the FCC - frankly, it would be best if government would just get out of our business altogether and let the "Free Enterprise" system float on it's own. Just another frivolous lawsuit and ultimately - we will all pay.

Grow up and accept responsibility for what you agreed to do in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by mark1214 July 11, 2008 8:05 AM PDT
A popular phrase says, "There is no such things as a free lunch". I think it was popularized by the economist Milton Friedman, but points to the fact that consumers are perfectly willing to sign the 2 year agreement for the Free or cheap phone, but then whine when they can't change to another carrier for the latest offering w/o suffering the consequences. if they don't like the $200 early termination fee, don't sign the agreement! There was probably a line of litigators perfectly willing to take the case for these whiners too. You signed the deal, now live up to it.
Reply to this comment
by mark1214 July 11, 2008 8:06 AM PDT
A popular phrase says, "There is no such things as a free lunch". I think it was popularized by the economist Milton Friedman, but points to the fact that consumers are perfectly willing to sign the 2 year agreement for the Free or cheap phone, but then whine when they can't change to another carrier for the latest offering w/o suffering the consequences. If they don't like the $200 early termination fee, don't sign the agreement! There was probably a line of litigators perfectly willing to take the case for these whiners too. You signed the deal, now live up to it.
Reply to this comment
by mark1214 July 11, 2008 8:06 AM PDT
A popular phrase says, "There is no such things as a free lunch". I think it was popularized by the economist Milton Friedman, but points to the fact that consumers are perfectly willing to sign the 2 year agreement for the Free or cheap phone, but then whine when they can't change to another carrier for the latest offering w/o suffering the consequences. If they don't like the $200 early termination fee, don't sign the agreement! There was probably a line of litigators perfectly willing to take the case for these whiners too. You signed the deal, now live up to it.
Reply to this comment
by Hold_Fast_Kilroy July 11, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
Here is a thought for the Cell Companies, how about different plans depending on whether you take a phone heavily subsidized, you have the termination fee. If you choose to pay full price for the phone, no termination fee. They seem to have no problem coming up with many, many different monthly plans, X# of minutes, talk, text, etc. Why not give a break to those who will pay full price for the phone? Or is that too logical!?
Reply to this comment
by July 11, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
The worst one in T-Mobile. They are the nazis of fees and inflexibility. Actually, I want to apologize to all the nazis out there
for being unfairly compared with T-Mobile.
Reply to this comment
by jltnol--2008 July 11, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
They ALL suck!

I don't know what planet some of you are living on, but here on Earth, dropped calls, bad/poor/unavailable service is just part of the norm with the cell industry. Nobody I know is "happy" with their cell phone service. Everybody has a horror story.

If my cell phone can get a message that I have voice mail, why can't the original call come through?

That, and the fact that customer service, like most service providers, is non-existent for the most part.

If the service was better across the board for ALL carriers, you'd see a lot less of disenfranchised users looking to to get out of a contract that has them paying for a service they cannot use.

Freemarket Economy? Baby, I want to own a company where you have to pay a monthly fee for at best mediocre service, then have the ability to supercharge you a fee when you have the audacity to want to get out of the contract.

Until service companies start providing a SERVICE, it's all about GREED.


They ALL suck. Period!
Reply to this comment
by alexrae July 31, 2008 5:23 PM PDT
How do I get some of my $575.00 back? I had 4 lines of Verizon service in Vegas, marriage went bust and I paid to terminate 3 lines so I wouldn't get stuck with ex and his mom and grandfather's bills. I transferred my service to where I live now but still paid the termination on those 3 other lines.
Reply to this comment
by KATRICE1971 October 30, 2008 9:06 PM PDT
I THINK THIS SETTLEMENT IS VERY FAIR, DUE TO I PAYED FOR TWO OR THREE LINES TO BE TERMINATED AND DID'NT HAVE NEW CELL PHONES. I HAD VERY OLD PHONES THAT I FOUND IN THE HOUSE FROM YEARS AGO. ONE LINE I HAD TURNED OFF WAS FROM MY NIECE SHE RAN MY CELL PHONE UP TALKING TO LITTLE BOYS. SO I HAD CELL PHONE TERMINATED THEN PURCHASED A METRO FOR HER. VERIZON CELL PHONE BILLS ARE VERY EXPENSIVE AND REIDICULAS. ITS ASHAME, BUT DO HAVE GOOD SERVICES
Reply to this comment
by mr anderson06 May 4, 2009 3:36 PM PDT
They made me go to a prepaid company. I like it better. Unlimited calls and text for 50 bucks.
Reply to this comment
by ChelleT18 July 23, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
It's funy how so many of you want to do the cry baby thing...but how you can get crappy service in your area adhere to the two years, transfer your service then have them tell you but we extended it for two months because you made a change or upgrade to the service....BS I got screwed on that and wish I had not missed out on the lawsuit!
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement