Comments on: Vonage sued for patent infringement--again
Patent-holding company Klausner Technologies has filed a lawsuit charging Vonage with infringing on its patents.
Patent-holding company Klausner Technologies has filed a lawsuit charging Vonage with infringing on its patents.
November 27, 2009 6:09 AM PST
November 27, 2009 6:00 AM PST
November 27, 2009 4:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Instead of trying to improve upon their existing services, they try to
sue a successful startup who is doing the better job at better
prices. Forget innovation, just sue the competition and when they
can't pay up... gobble them up and increase your prices without
having to improve anything!!! God its really getting incredibly
annoying.
n : the lack of knowledge or education
There is a thing called the law. And infringing on other peoples
devolopment is not cool. You think this is about competition?
This is about a company that flat out of the blue starts to
advertise for a technology that they "claim" to own. The
technology for Voip has been around for over ten years, and it
takes a LONG legal process for the courts to figure out who
rightfully should own the patent.
If you wrote a song and someone else caught wind of it and
started marketing it like it was their own I think you would be
pissed too. You should have done your reasearch, and shouldn't
have hopped on the band wagon. Vonage investors have started
to cash in thier stocks because they DON'T OWN THE
TECHNOLOGY. They go out and buy three patens from some
company in Texas so that they might be able to cover their rear
in court. But check this out, more than 400,000 customers are
paying homage to Vonage when like theives they have infringed
on something that isn't theirs. It suck to be a part of a company
that has stole a market they don't deserve.
Let me also say that my dad has received OVER 30 PATENTS on
Voip technology, and while Vonage is making a killing in fishing
people into their hooks and having no right to even be at the
pond, my dad has to hire lawyers to get what is rightfully owed
to him, and spend time, and more time just to get somewhere.
So boohoo, cry me a river while you pay into a buch of crooks.
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FP
TO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7068668.PN.&OS=PN/
7068668&RS=PN/7068668
n : the lack of knowledge or education
There is a thing called the law. And infringing on other peoples
development is not cool. You think this is about competition?
This is about a company that flat out of the blue starts to
advertise for a technology that they "claim" to own. The
technology for Voip has been around for over ten years, and it
takes a LONG legal process for the courts to figure out who
rightfully should own the patent.
If you wrote a song and someone else caught wind of it and
started marketing it like it was their own I think you would be
pissed too. You should have done your research, and shouldn't
have hopped on the bandwagon. Vonage investors have started
to cash in their stocks because they DON'T OWN THE
TECHNOLOGY. They go out and buy three patens from some
company in Texas so that they might be able to cover their rear
in court. But check this out, more than 400,000 customers are
paying homage to Vonage when like thieves they have infringed
on something that isn't theirs. It sucks to be a part of a
company that has stole a market they don't deserve.
Let me also say that my dad has received OVER 30 PATENTS on
Voip technology, and while Vonage is making a killing in fishing
people into their hooks and having no right to even be at the
pond, my dad has to hire lawyers to get what is rightfully owed
to him, and spend time, and more time just to get somewhere.
So boohoo, cry me a river while you pay into a bunch of crooks.
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FP
TO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7068668.PN.&OS=PN/
7068668&RS=PN/7068668
- Suing the competition.
- by ericblr July 10, 2006 11:38 PM PDT
- Is this what major companies do now when competition heats up?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Ignorance
- by AudStanley July 16, 2006 10:38 PM PDT
- ignorance
- Like this View reply
Processing -
- Ignorance
- by AudStanley July 16, 2006 10:39 PM PDT
- ignorance
- Like this View reply
Processing -
(10 Comments)Instead of trying to improve upon their existing services, they try to
sue a successful startup who is doing the better job at better
prices. Forget innovation, just sue the competition and when they
can't pay up... gobble them up and increase your prices without
having to improve anything!!! God its really getting incredibly
annoying.
n : the lack of knowledge or education
There is a thing called the law. And infringing on other peoples
devolopment is not cool. You think this is about competition?
This is about a company that flat out of the blue starts to
advertise for a technology that they "claim" to own. The
technology for Voip has been around for over ten years, and it
takes a LONG legal process for the courts to figure out who
rightfully should own the patent.
If you wrote a song and someone else caught wind of it and
started marketing it like it was their own I think you would be
pissed too. You should have done your reasearch, and shouldn't
have hopped on the band wagon. Vonage investors have started
to cash in thier stocks because they DON'T OWN THE
TECHNOLOGY. They go out and buy three patens from some
company in Texas so that they might be able to cover their rear
in court. But check this out, more than 400,000 customers are
paying homage to Vonage when like theives they have infringed
on something that isn't theirs. It suck to be a part of a company
that has stole a market they don't deserve.
Let me also say that my dad has received OVER 30 PATENTS on
Voip technology, and while Vonage is making a killing in fishing
people into their hooks and having no right to even be at the
pond, my dad has to hire lawyers to get what is rightfully owed
to him, and spend time, and more time just to get somewhere.
So boohoo, cry me a river while you pay into a buch of crooks.
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FP
TO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7068668.PN.&OS=PN/
7068668&RS=PN/7068668
n : the lack of knowledge or education
There is a thing called the law. And infringing on other peoples
development is not cool. You think this is about competition?
This is about a company that flat out of the blue starts to
advertise for a technology that they "claim" to own. The
technology for Voip has been around for over ten years, and it
takes a LONG legal process for the courts to figure out who
rightfully should own the patent.
If you wrote a song and someone else caught wind of it and
started marketing it like it was their own I think you would be
pissed too. You should have done your research, and shouldn't
have hopped on the bandwagon. Vonage investors have started
to cash in their stocks because they DON'T OWN THE
TECHNOLOGY. They go out and buy three patens from some
company in Texas so that they might be able to cover their rear
in court. But check this out, more than 400,000 customers are
paying homage to Vonage when like thieves they have infringed
on something that isn't theirs. It sucks to be a part of a
company that has stole a market they don't deserve.
Let me also say that my dad has received OVER 30 PATENTS on
Voip technology, and while Vonage is making a killing in fishing
people into their hooks and having no right to even be at the
pond, my dad has to hire lawyers to get what is rightfully owed
to him, and spend time, and more time just to get somewhere.
So boohoo, cry me a river while you pay into a bunch of crooks.
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FP
TO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7068668.PN.&OS=PN/
7068668&RS=PN/7068668