Comments on: Paid Android apps blocked on developer phones
Creators of paid applications for Google's mobile operating system can purchase a $399 unlocked version of HTC's G1 phone, but not download their own apps to it.
Creators of paid applications for Google's mobile operating system can purchase a $399 unlocked version of HTC's G1 phone, but not download their own apps to it.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I was tempted to buy one of those too. Anyone know if the unlocked G1 DOES FOR SURE work with Sprint?
Hmm.. those folks seem to be missing from this thread.... perhaps they are at the humble-pie restaurant down the road? :)
</sarcasm>
The security of the system relies on its obscurity; instead of sprucing it up, they are limiting and punishing and eroding the goodwill of those most likely to make Android a success. How smart is that ?
Google: pls. reverse that stupid decision. It does absolutely nothing to stop anything from anyone with even a mild interest and a modicum of skill to hack the platform. All it does is annoy developers.
Developers, although inconvenienced, should appreciate this measure, as Google appears to be trying to protect the revenue stream for the applications.
I don't know what the fuss is from the developer community. I guess mainly developers who have not released yet?
Anyway, I just don't seem to get Google's plan on that one
1. The OS is half-a$$ed compared to anything on the market. It sorta can compete with WinMo 2002 and early versions of Palm, but not at par with any of the mainstream OS in 2009 (Apple, WinMo, BlackBerry, Symbian)
2. The OS is free. Is Google planning to make money on mobile ads? I am curious to see how that is going to work out
3. The OS comes with some odd restrictions. There was a free Linux OS on the market - it died very quickly, so "free" (and especially Google's "free") is not attractive enough for the developers to write apps
I will be surprised if if gains any significant market share. Google hasn't made a single product with half-decent UI (everything Google has looks like it was ported directly from the EGA-resolution programs written in early '90s). The only way Google can succeed is by giving carriers incentives to push its phones to the unsuspected customers. But then, where is a revenue stream? You not just giving something away for free, you pay someone to take it off your hands. Great business plan.
Well, actually they don't need to buy their own app since the Dev phone allows them to upload the app directly to the phone from their PC.
- by darthstupid February 27, 2009 9:07 AM PST
- iPhone killer. Right.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)