Version: 2008

Comments on: Paid Android apps blocked on developer phones

Creators of paid applications for Google's mobile operating system can purchase a $399 unlocked version of HTC's G1 phone, but not download their own apps to it.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by timber2005 February 26, 2009 7:22 PM PST
I understand the point but it seems so wrong.
I was tempted to buy one of those too. Anyone know if the unlocked G1 DOES FOR SURE work with Sprint?
Reply to this comment
by CODKill February 26, 2009 9:20 PM PST
I don't see how it could work for sprint considering that sprint is CDMA and the G1 works on GSM. Unless they made a new model for the CDMA network, I don't think that it'll work for you.
by sflocal February 26, 2009 11:51 PM PST
But..but...but... Android was supposed the be the end-all-be-all of corporate dictatorship and show another (nameless) phone provider just how a truly "open" system would set the standard. Say it ain't so that Google is actually trying to control what one does with their phone?! Oh.. the tragedy!

Hmm.. those folks seem to be missing from this thread.... perhaps they are at the humble-pie restaurant down the road? :)

</sarcasm>
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight February 27, 2009 12:13 PM PST
Interesting. And to think I had hopes for Android. How is it that Windows Mobile is now about the most open mobile OS?
by Rants&Raves February 27, 2009 12:01 AM PST
Personally, I feel cheated. That means that I now need two phones to develop for Android; one to develop, one to test in an actual release environment, watch what my competitors are doing, and obtain the same experience as the average user out there. Given that I can also do all of that on a regular G1, I wonder what I got by shipping Google $400 of my own money. A crippled device that`s actually more expensive than an unlocked G1, that`s what. Boo.

The security of the system relies on its obscurity; instead of sprucing it up, they are limiting and punishing and eroding the goodwill of those most likely to make Android a success. How smart is that ?

Google: pls. reverse that stupid decision. It does absolutely nothing to stop anything from anyone with even a mild interest and a modicum of skill to hack the platform. All it does is annoy developers.
Reply to this comment
by forever4now February 27, 2009 3:32 AM PST
I suspect this is a temporary measure, until they can devise a solution that will safely permit it (assuming that's possible).

Developers, although inconvenienced, should appreciate this measure, as Google appears to be trying to protect the revenue stream for the applications.
Reply to this comment
by chrispix99 February 27, 2009 5:24 AM PST
forever4now, as a developer, I have to say I agree with you. While somewhat a pain, they are only doing this so your APKs don't get released into the wild, emailed around and installed, thus loosing out on revenue.

I don't know what the fuss is from the developer community. I guess mainly developers who have not released yet?
Reply to this comment
by The User February 27, 2009 5:54 AM PST
But, but, but it is open source - everyone is free to open, modify and use it. Ah, it is Google open source...

Anyway, I just don't seem to get Google's plan on that one
1. The OS is half-a$$ed compared to anything on the market. It sorta can compete with WinMo 2002 and early versions of Palm, but not at par with any of the mainstream OS in 2009 (Apple, WinMo, BlackBerry, Symbian)
2. The OS is free. Is Google planning to make money on mobile ads? I am curious to see how that is going to work out
3. The OS comes with some odd restrictions. There was a free Linux OS on the market - it died very quickly, so "free" (and especially Google's "free") is not attractive enough for the developers to write apps

I will be surprised if if gains any significant market share. Google hasn't made a single product with half-decent UI (everything Google has looks like it was ported directly from the EGA-resolution programs written in early '90s). The only way Google can succeed is by giving carriers incentives to push its phones to the unsuspected customers. But then, where is a revenue stream? You not just giving something away for free, you pay someone to take it off your hands. Great business plan.
Reply to this comment
by Maarek Stele February 27, 2009 7:38 AM PST
someone buy me this phone, my b-day is coming up soon.

Well, actually they don't need to buy their own app since the Dev phone allows them to upload the app directly to the phone from their PC.
Reply to this comment
by darthstupid February 27, 2009 9:07 AM PST
iPhone killer. Right.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement