Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7

Comments on: Verizon Wireless to improve indoor cell coverage

Company expects to introduce so-called femtocell technology early next year to help subscribers who get poor cell phone reception at home or in the office.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by clintbradford October 28, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
>>...cell phone operators shouldn't actually be charging customers an extra fee to use these services...

I do not expect my cell phone - nor my commercial/amateur two-way radios - to work in a basement or in an underground parking structure or in a steel building.

BDA - bi-directional antennas - have been available for years, and can be used to distribute radio signals throughout a building. In many locales, BDA are mandatory: Some fire departments refuse to enter commercial structures unless there is a BDA system in place so that they can communicate with their emergency personnel throughout the building.

A consumer who expects 100% coverage in all situations from a mere cell phone is expecting too much from the technology, in my humble opinion.

Clint Bradford
Mira Loma CA
Reply to this comment
by i_am_still_wade October 28, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
Verizon Wireless ... we never stop overcharging you!
Reply to this comment
by studiodave56 October 28, 2008 8:38 PM PDT
Verizon Wireless ... we always stop working for you.

This is exactly the problem that I go through every month with Verizon and the cell tower is less than 1,500 feet from my wood frame house. Verizon completely denies anything is ever wrong. Verizon - 30 days to go, hello ATT.
Reply to this comment
by ideckard October 29, 2008 8:48 AM PDT
Hello ATT, hello new set of problems! My father has ATT with the exact same issues. We called and they wouldn't even send someone out with a meter to check the tower reception in the area. I am still waiting on someone in management to call me back (2 months and counting). Their customer service needs to be reworked because they just pay you lip service. Do as much research as you can about all the providers in your area before you switch.
by joeronimo October 29, 2008 11:14 PM PDT
I hardly ever reply to posts...not really my thing. So that's kind of a clue at how dissappointed I was with ATT. I'm not partial to any company or product out there. Whatever it is...I want the best for the least and it sounds like you do to. I've used both companies, and waffled back and fourth for the same reason. Verizon's reception area blows away ATT's. I work mostly in suburbs of K.C. but live in K.C. With ATT, I dropped calls all the time..... in my driveway. The only thing taller than house rooftops for 5 miles....is cell towers. It wasn't just my phone either. My wife's company phone, also my neighbors co. phone , which also was used as his home phone. (OH yeah...he lives on the hill). The only thing worse than Verizon's price and bullying crap if you're late with a payment once...which is why I switched from Ver. to ATT, is their crap reception and customer sevrvice. Lost reception waiting on hold...with them more than once! lol Anyways, you might wanna rethink your decision to switch, or at least take the month to ask around. 1 more thing....if you do switch and you happen to hit roaming areas, it's ironic who's towers ATT uses most....I'll stop there. Good luck either way you choose.
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement