Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon

Comments on: Beware of broadband speed overkill

Cable operators and phone companies are increasing speeds of their broadband service, but the average consumer may not need the boost.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 2 of 3 pages (203 Comments)
an insanely stupid contention!
by jwm4atl May 17, 2006 12:28 PM PDT
This is not fact-based journalism; it is simply hyperventilating nonsense! More speed is always better; why else would networks have progressed to 10Gbs backbones from less than 1Gbs 10 years ago; why is the default LAN connection now 100 mbs and on its way to 1 gbs; why are there so much/many more broadband usages/apps in South Korea, where 100 mbs residential broadband connections are commonplace.

I don't have time for a detailed, thorough fisking of this drivel, but suggest that the author do his/her homework before writing. But that's probably not gonna happen, because homework is "work" which is anathema to lazy journalists.
Reply to this comment
Telcos LOVE idiots like you
by thenet411 May 17, 2006 12:38 PM PDT
You just keep right on paying for the fastest connection you can get your little hands on. I love idiots like you too. You subsidize my necessary high speed access by paying for bandwidth you more than likely never use. Thanks. I will add you to my Xmas card list.
View all 2 replies
I Disagree
by chuck_whealton May 17, 2006 1:11 PM PDT
More speed is better in MANY APPLICATIONS. But I can say that I use my broadband connectivity a lot, and could easily live with Verizon's 768kb down speeds. Unfortunately, I can't get it and naturally, Comcast doesn't offered a tiered service because they have no incentive to do so.

I don't need several megabits per second down. I simply don't need it. Not everybody's steaming video on an hourly basis.

Yea, some people do, and for those people the higher speed access is great and they should be able to go for it.

For me, if a 768kb service is ever available for less, I'll dump Comcast in a heartbeat.

Charles R. Whealton
chuck whealton @ don'tspam.net
Yep
by X99 May 17, 2006 4:22 PM PDT
> This is not fact-based journalism; it is simply
> hyperventilating nonsense!

Uhhh... Is there such a thing as newspaper that writes articles based on facts? Didn't those go
out of style at 25 years ago?
Yep
by X99 May 17, 2006 4:23 PM PDT
> This is not fact-based journalism; it is simply
> hyperventilating nonsense!

Uhhh... Is there such a thing as a newspaper that writes articles based on facts? Didn't those go
out of style about 25 years ago?
correction
by onux May 18, 2006 10:09 AM PDT
You should do YOUR homework.
Verizon doesn't deal with LANs. Their networks are for WANs -- large geographic areas such as cities, and multiple cities (or metropolitans) are MANs. These guys typically have a backbone of less than 2Mbps if I'm not mistaken. Remember, the internet was built on old telephone systems.
an insanely stupid contention!
by jwm4atl May 17, 2006 12:28 PM PDT
This is not fact-based journalism; it is simply hyperventilating nonsense! More speed is always better; why else would networks have progressed to 10Gbs backbones from less than 1Gbs 10 years ago; why is the default LAN connection now 100 mbs and on its way to 1 gbs; why are there so much/many more broadband usages/apps in South Korea, where 100 mbs residential broadband connections are commonplace.

I don't have time for a detailed, thorough fisking of this drivel, but suggest that the author do his/her homework before writing. But that's probably not gonna happen, because homework is "work" which is anathema to lazy journalists.
Reply to this comment
Telcos LOVE idiots like you
by thenet411 May 17, 2006 12:38 PM PDT
You just keep right on paying for the fastest connection you can get your little hands on. I love idiots like you too. You subsidize my necessary high speed access by paying for bandwidth you more than likely never use. Thanks. I will add you to my Xmas card list.
View all 2 replies
I Disagree
by chuck_whealton May 17, 2006 1:11 PM PDT
More speed is better in MANY APPLICATIONS. But I can say that I use my broadband connectivity a lot, and could easily live with Verizon's 768kb down speeds. Unfortunately, I can't get it and naturally, Comcast doesn't offered a tiered service because they have no incentive to do so.

I don't need several megabits per second down. I simply don't need it. Not everybody's steaming video on an hourly basis.

Yea, some people do, and for those people the higher speed access is great and they should be able to go for it.

For me, if a 768kb service is ever available for less, I'll dump Comcast in a heartbeat.

Charles R. Whealton
chuck whealton @ don'tspam.net
Yep
by X99 May 17, 2006 4:22 PM PDT
> This is not fact-based journalism; it is simply
> hyperventilating nonsense!

Uhhh... Is there such a thing as newspaper that writes articles based on facts? Didn't those go
out of style at 25 years ago?
Yep
by X99 May 17, 2006 4:23 PM PDT
> This is not fact-based journalism; it is simply
> hyperventilating nonsense!

Uhhh... Is there such a thing as a newspaper that writes articles based on facts? Didn't those go
out of style about 25 years ago?
correction
by onux May 18, 2006 10:09 AM PDT
You should do YOUR homework.
Verizon doesn't deal with LANs. Their networks are for WANs -- large geographic areas such as cities, and multiple cities (or metropolitans) are MANs. These guys typically have a backbone of less than 2Mbps if I'm not mistaken. Remember, the internet was built on old telephone systems.
Did Schommer really say that???
by Jackson Cracker May 17, 2006 2:24 PM PDT
>64Kbps of RAM on their PCs

Either he's confusing speed with capacity (and bits with bytes),
or this is a misquote.
Reply to this comment
Did Schommer really say that???
by Jackson Cracker May 17, 2006 2:24 PM PDT
>64Kbps of RAM on their PCs

Either he's confusing speed with capacity (and bits with bytes),
or this is a misquote.
Reply to this comment
Give me reliability!!!
by amigabill May 17, 2006 3:55 PM PDT
Cable operators and phone companies also justify boosting speeds (and sometimes prices) by pointing to all the new multimedia applications people are using. They say their customers need more bandwidth to listen to music, watch videos and play games on the Internet.


Uh, not in my experience for games. Final Fantasy XI works pretty well at slowish speeds, and my cable company's speed increases have not made any difference in gameplay. Reliability on the other hand is extremely important, and my cablemodem provider has been very poor at this. Not having a good constant connection gets one kicked off the FFXI server. This happens a great deal in my house. My service provider has run a new line from their outside service box to the house, we've put in a dedicated modem line off the first (very high quality) splitter for best signal strength, and I've replaced the modem, router, gave them a good battery UPS power system, and it's all still questionable at times. While they keep saying they used to have server problems those were fixed and can;t be causing this, I simply don't believe them. There's nothing else on my end to be wrong, and all my new equipment (different brands even) has the same problems as the old stuff, so I believe the old stuff to be in good condition.

FIOS is being installed in my town, but I don't know when they might get to my particular neighborhood, and I'm holding off switching to DSL until there's some news about this. I hope Verizon's reliability is better than my cable company's. Heck, I'll bali out on cable TV to FIOSTV or satellite just to stop giving my cable guys any money at all after all this crap, even though the TV service hasn't been a problem, other than that month they had my house completely disconnected from any cable whatsoever during the rediculously drawn-out repair process... (OK, it was only 19 days disconnected, but still, it's rediculous)
Reply to this comment
Give me reliability!!!
by amigabill May 17, 2006 3:55 PM PDT
Cable operators and phone companies also justify boosting speeds (and sometimes prices) by pointing to all the new multimedia applications people are using. They say their customers need more bandwidth to listen to music, watch videos and play games on the Internet.


Uh, not in my experience for games. Final Fantasy XI works pretty well at slowish speeds, and my cable company's speed increases have not made any difference in gameplay. Reliability on the other hand is extremely important, and my cablemodem provider has been very poor at this. Not having a good constant connection gets one kicked off the FFXI server. This happens a great deal in my house. My service provider has run a new line from their outside service box to the house, we've put in a dedicated modem line off the first (very high quality) splitter for best signal strength, and I've replaced the modem, router, gave them a good battery UPS power system, and it's all still questionable at times. While they keep saying they used to have server problems those were fixed and can;t be causing this, I simply don't believe them. There's nothing else on my end to be wrong, and all my new equipment (different brands even) has the same problems as the old stuff, so I believe the old stuff to be in good condition.

FIOS is being installed in my town, but I don't know when they might get to my particular neighborhood, and I'm holding off switching to DSL until there's some news about this. I hope Verizon's reliability is better than my cable company's. Heck, I'll bali out on cable TV to FIOSTV or satellite just to stop giving my cable guys any money at all after all this crap, even though the TV service hasn't been a problem, other than that month they had my house completely disconnected from any cable whatsoever during the rediculously drawn-out repair process... (OK, it was only 19 days disconnected, but still, it's rediculous)
Reply to this comment
Upload is the difference!
by JoJo Pumpkin May 17, 2006 4:58 PM PDT
From what I am to understand, you are only able to download as fast as the server you are downloading from allows. Faster Downloads mean nothing except making it seem more valuable to the consumer. Whether you're using iTunes with an ISP download of 5mps or 15mps you'll still download the file at 768kps.

What matters is your upload speeds. If you're using digital phone and/or online gaming with an upload of 256kps your experience with these technologies will be marginal. As these speeds increase you'll have less lag and fewer dropped games, your phone will have lost it's delay so you can have a real conversation without cutting each other off in mid sentence.

Sadly my only option in my area is Charter Communications and my upload is only 152kps according to speed check at Broadband Reports. My online gaming and telephone service is simply unusable. When I was with Comcast I was uploading at a little under 768Kps and it wasn't so bad.

So let them open the flood gates it doesn't matter. Just make sure your getting what they're selling you!
Reply to this comment
Upload is the difference!
by JoJo Pumpkin May 17, 2006 4:58 PM PDT
From what I am to understand, you are only able to download as fast as the server you are downloading from allows. Faster Downloads mean nothing except making it seem more valuable to the consumer. Whether you're using iTunes with an ISP download of 5mps or 15mps you'll still download the file at 768kps.

What matters is your upload speeds. If you're using digital phone and/or online gaming with an upload of 256kps your experience with these technologies will be marginal. As these speeds increase you'll have less lag and fewer dropped games, your phone will have lost it's delay so you can have a real conversation without cutting each other off in mid sentence.

Sadly my only option in my area is Charter Communications and my upload is only 152kps according to speed check at Broadband Reports. My online gaming and telephone service is simply unusable. When I was with Comcast I was uploading at a little under 768Kps and it wasn't so bad.

So let them open the flood gates it doesn't matter. Just make sure your getting what they're selling you!
Reply to this comment
Broadband Speed
by atpcliff May 17, 2006 7:16 PM PDT
Hi!

We've had Time-Warner cable for about 3 years. All I hear from my wife is how slow it is and how pissed off she gets waiting for stuff to load.

She uses it to work often from home, and she would really appreciate it if it was about 5x as fast as it is now.

I would also appreciate it being much faster.

Cliff
Green Bay
Reply to this comment
Broadband Speed
by atpcliff May 17, 2006 7:16 PM PDT
Hi!

We've had Time-Warner cable for about 3 years. All I hear from my wife is how slow it is and how pissed off she gets waiting for stuff to load.

She uses it to work often from home, and she would really appreciate it if it was about 5x as fast as it is now.

I would also appreciate it being much faster.

Cliff
Green Bay
Reply to this comment
AT&T DSL Prices Wrong, they forgot line charges!
by libertyforall1776 May 17, 2006 11:18 PM PDT
The AT&T DSL Prices are wrong, they forgot that they mandate you
pay for a phone line/phone number, and those charges add about
$15/month to the cost! Talk about deceptive advertising! It used
to be that you could JUST get a DSL line with NO phone number!
Reply to this comment
This seems to be pretty common
by Jackson Cracker May 18, 2006 5:34 PM PDT
I noticed the same thing when I got a postcard in the mail
advertising DSL at $15 a month.

When I checked the company's website, I noticed two things
that made the offer less attractive than it sounded at first:

1) The $15 was just for the ISP, and I would have to pay
another $15 a month to the local phone company.
2) This was only for the lowest speed service, and if your
local telco is Qwest this is only 256 kb/s !!!
AT&T DSL Prices Wrong, they forgot line charges!
by libertyforall1776 May 17, 2006 11:18 PM PDT
The AT&T DSL Prices are wrong, they forgot that they mandate you
pay for a phone line/phone number, and those charges add about
$15/month to the cost! Talk about deceptive advertising! It used
to be that you could JUST get a DSL line with NO phone number!
Reply to this comment
This seems to be pretty common
by Jackson Cracker May 18, 2006 5:34 PM PDT
I noticed the same thing when I got a postcard in the mail
advertising DSL at $15 a month.

When I checked the company's website, I noticed two things
that made the offer less attractive than it sounded at first:

1) The $15 was just for the ISP, and I would have to pay
another $15 a month to the local phone company.
2) This was only for the lowest speed service, and if your
local telco is Qwest this is only 256 kb/s !!!
It amazes me....
by tahbasco May 18, 2006 10:08 AM PDT
<rant>Some of you all are right, most people don't need the higher speeds, but it isn't about need, it's about what people want. Telling people what they NEED or what they should or shouldn't is a property of socialism. Americans thrive on individualism, and elitist morons like some of you on here can't understand that. If people want a 30/2 connection, so be it. If they want to run servers on their home connections so be it. Broadband technology is here for a reason. Rather it's playing games, running servers, or browsing the web it's for everybody. Stop *******' because choose to do what they like with things THEIR money pays for.</rant>

Whew, anyway we're lagging behind in broadband speeds compared to the rest of the world. Bring on the higher speeds because IMO they'll be much appreciated as we move forward.
Reply to this comment
It amazes me....
by tahbasco May 18, 2006 10:08 AM PDT
<rant>Some of you all are right, most people don't need the higher speeds, but it isn't about need, it's about what people want. Telling people what they NEED or what they should or shouldn't is a property of socialism. Americans thrive on individualism, and elitist morons like some of you on here can't understand that. If people want a 30/2 connection, so be it. If they want to run servers on their home connections so be it. Broadband technology is here for a reason. Rather it's playing games, running servers, or browsing the web it's for everybody. Stop *******' because choose to do what they like with things THEIR money pays for.</rant>

Whew, anyway we're lagging behind in broadband speeds compared to the rest of the world. Bring on the higher speeds because IMO they'll be much appreciated as we move forward.
Reply to this comment
Not a one of you understands networks.
by Axiomatic13 May 18, 2006 10:50 AM PDT
Especially the author! Fact: No matter how wide a pipe to the internet you have, if you are not using it, it does not effect the overall internet speed at all. This is FUD.

The only guy in this talkback who had a clue was the guy who said its all about the upload speed.

The ******* author did not even talk about QoS and how it actually help fix a lot of this perceived problem.

The big problem is the telcos and their adherence to PPPoE which basically allows them to rape you for $$$ while not really having a well built network to start with.

If you are currently with a ISP who is using PPPoE, LEAVE THEM ASAP!!! There are plenty of alternatives which are using regular old DHCP on backbones which are not part of a major telco.

Networks just dont work the way this author thinks they do.
Reply to this comment
Open mouth, insert foot
by schubb May 19, 2006 7:46 AM PDT
Actually you may want to understand how large networks work.

Do you think that all connections are asynchronous to the point a home connection is? How does someone with your enlightment think Google or Microsoft handles their connections? They have nice, wide synchronous pipes.

The reason the average home connection is hobbled is to make sure the average home user is not going to need it. All to make sure he/sh is not running an ISP or server farm on connections not designed to handle the traffic. It comes down to money in the end, you want fast uploads, they will sell you business service.
View reply
did you read the same article?
by johnnyis42 May 24, 2006 3:45 PM PDT
not sure if you read this article, or just the title. the author claims HDvideo streams are being pointed to as potential hoggs of bandwidth, but quicly points out it may not even utilize all the bandwidth available to consumers' premium connections.

and, uh, if you use a cable modem (aka hybrid fiber-coaxial access network), how much of the pipe you use does in fact effect everyone on your fiber node. No, it doesn't effect the overall Internet speed (capital I) but it does effect you and your neighbors' connection to the Internet.

As for QoS... this is not a corporate LAN or MAN, we're talking about home ISP's... not much in the way of QoS besides throttling.... not the same idea there.
Not a one of you understands networks.
by Axiomatic13 May 18, 2006 10:50 AM PDT
Especially the author! Fact: No matter how wide a pipe to the internet you have, if you are not using it, it does not effect the overall internet speed at all. This is FUD.

The only guy in this talkback who had a clue was the guy who said its all about the upload speed.

The ******* author did not even talk about QoS and how it actually help fix a lot of this perceived problem.

The big problem is the telcos and their adherence to PPPoE which basically allows them to rape you for $$$ while not really having a well built network to start with.

If you are currently with a ISP who is using PPPoE, LEAVE THEM ASAP!!! There are plenty of alternatives which are using regular old DHCP on backbones which are not part of a major telco.

Networks just dont work the way this author thinks they do.
Reply to this comment
Open mouth, insert foot
by schubb May 19, 2006 7:46 AM PDT
Actually you may want to understand how large networks work.

Do you think that all connections are asynchronous to the point a home connection is? How does someone with your enlightment think Google or Microsoft handles their connections? They have nice, wide synchronous pipes.

The reason the average home connection is hobbled is to make sure the average home user is not going to need it. All to make sure he/sh is not running an ISP or server farm on connections not designed to handle the traffic. It comes down to money in the end, you want fast uploads, they will sell you business service.
View reply
did you read the same article?
by johnnyis42 May 24, 2006 3:45 PM PDT
not sure if you read this article, or just the title. the author claims HDvideo streams are being pointed to as potential hoggs of bandwidth, but quicly points out it may not even utilize all the bandwidth available to consumers' premium connections.

and, uh, if you use a cable modem (aka hybrid fiber-coaxial access network), how much of the pipe you use does in fact effect everyone on your fiber node. No, it doesn't effect the overall Internet speed (capital I) but it does effect you and your neighbors' connection to the Internet.

As for QoS... this is not a corporate LAN or MAN, we're talking about home ISP's... not much in the way of QoS besides throttling.... not the same idea there.
Compare Other Costs
by ieg5234 May 20, 2006 4:45 AM PDT
They say Verizon has the best internet deal for speed but what it doesn't tell you is that with Verizon you pay heavily for other services. To get their DSL you have to get one of their long distance phone packages and pay extras for additional phone services like caller ID, call waiting, voice mail, and the rest of those sevices. In the end you pay more than twice the cost of Atlantic Broadband packages and other service providers. Verizon will crush your wallet with their phone charges! It's that expensive.
Reply to this comment
Compare Other Costs
by ieg5234 May 20, 2006 4:45 AM PDT
They say Verizon has the best internet deal for speed but what it doesn't tell you is that with Verizon you pay heavily for other services. To get their DSL you have to get one of their long distance phone packages and pay extras for additional phone services like caller ID, call waiting, voice mail, and the rest of those sevices. In the end you pay more than twice the cost of Atlantic Broadband packages and other service providers. Verizon will crush your wallet with their phone charges! It's that expensive.
Reply to this comment
What About Downloading DVDs, TV, CDs, etc?
by richto May 20, 2006 5:06 AM PDT
How daft to say there is no use for bandwidth. There are many thing that benefit greatly from increased speed. e.g. already a DVDR is 9 GB, presumably when new HD DVD movies become available to download on the Internet then these will be up to 45 GB.

The faster the better....
Reply to this comment
What About Downloading DVDs, TV, CDs, etc?
by richto May 20, 2006 5:06 AM PDT
How daft to say there is no use for bandwidth. There are many thing that benefit greatly from increased speed. e.g. already a DVDR is 9 GB, presumably when new HD DVD movies become available to download on the Internet then these will be up to 45 GB.

The faster the better....
Reply to this comment
Showing 2 of 3 pages (203 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement