Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Study: Americans' home Net adoption slowing

A new research report suggests that Americans' home access to the Internet is coming close to peaking.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
How about the poor?
by J.G. February 23, 2006 6:35 PM PST
When I wrote about this issue a few years ago, the focus was on
the digital divide -- people who can't afford Internet access.
Only about 10 percent of people Pew polled at the time said they
were purposely rejecting home Internet access. It is doubtful
that has changed much.

Some of the people shut out by being low-income have
obviously acquired dial-up Internet access. But, I would think
more of them are still not on the Web because of the cost.

I rarely say a reporter has done a poor job. But, by missing a
major aspect of the topic, C/Net has done an embarrassingly
poor job here.
Reply to this comment
I reject that argument
by gwats1957 February 24, 2006 5:37 PM PST
I'm a transit driver in a major US city. People board my local
service and will go on forever with excuses about why they don't
have the $1.50 local fare and I let them ride for free, per our
employer's instructions. These same losers will then go to the
back of the bus, pull out a $150 cell phone with $50+ per
month service, and complain loudly into the phone about what a
jerk I am for asking for the fare!
I'm sure there are folks that honestly can't afford $45 per
month for broadband internet service but I'm convinced that not
having this service @ home is matter of choice...like buying that
$50 bus pass at the beginnig of the month or begging a Bus
driver for a ride 50 times per month. Bottom line.... you afford
what you need or want and discard the rest as "too expensive".
Life's about choices and we are judged not only about what
choices we make, but how well we manage those choices. If
there were no more folks who could afford broadband service,
ISP's would be declaring 100% saturation and doubling their
monthly rates.
Is broadband overpriced? You bet! But since the Federal
Government is in bed with ISP's, we have little choice but to pay
the bill.
View reply
Because they're still waiting for what they already paid for
by ordaj February 23, 2006 6:45 PM PST
Fiber to the home. Already bought and paid for.

http://www.newnetworks.com/broadbandscandals.htm
Reply to this comment
Americans' broadband use slowing because...
by i_made_this February 24, 2006 7:34 AM PST
...the idiot monopoly ISP's holding hands with a useless FCC wish us not to have broadband. Your and my administration in DC in its great wisdom supports these criminals' desire to continue to turn us into a less developed nation. Together, these clowns prefer subscribing 40% of Americans at $45.00/month rather than subscribing 95% at $14.95/month. At even $14.95, their cable profitability is immense. At the current $45.00, it's criminal - but only if we Americans make it so.
Reply to this comment
Your economic theories....
by Earl Benser February 26, 2006 1:35 PM PST
,,, are abysmally bad. IF the ISP are overcharging so much, park
your open mouth and come up with a cheap alternative. Once you
begin to understand the total expenses involved, your opinions
might become a bit more rational.
The problem is not cost, its available coverage
by FarmerChet February 24, 2006 10:55 AM PST
A key data point is missing in this article.
It is estimated that only 40% of all homes in the United States have access to Broadband of some kind.
I live in a rural area. We can use dial-up only. There is nothing else.
We will never get cable or dsl as we are too far from a city.
The providers have saturated the available markets and don't have a base of *new* users to pitch to.
Once they can get out to the 60% of homes with no boradband access its certain that the internet adoption numbers will climb.
Reply to this comment
Would EV-DO Help?
by dghess February 24, 2006 1:46 PM PST
It is possible to use EV-DO to get 500-700 kbps accross most of the US where CDMA wireless service is available.
1. Would this be something that you would be interested in?
2. Would you be willing to pay $30 a month to get it?
I have been trying to work with carriers to prove in a business case to offer such a service and would be interested in your feedback.
View reply
What about Satelite?
by gwats1957 February 24, 2006 5:45 PM PST
DirecTV offers broadband over their US satelite system for the
lower 48 states right along with network TV coverage if you live
beyond the usable signal range of a major US TV market. A few $$
$ invested and you're online!
View all 2 replies
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement