Comments on: Study: Americans' home Net adoption slowing
A new research report suggests that Americans' home access to the Internet is coming close to peaking.![]()
A new research report suggests that Americans' home access to the Internet is coming close to peaking.![]()
December 2, 2009 5:21 PM PST
December 2, 2009 4:37 PM PST
December 2, 2009 4:14 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
the digital divide -- people who can't afford Internet access.
Only about 10 percent of people Pew polled at the time said they
were purposely rejecting home Internet access. It is doubtful
that has changed much.
Some of the people shut out by being low-income have
obviously acquired dial-up Internet access. But, I would think
more of them are still not on the Web because of the cost.
I rarely say a reporter has done a poor job. But, by missing a
major aspect of the topic, C/Net has done an embarrassingly
poor job here.
service and will go on forever with excuses about why they don't
have the $1.50 local fare and I let them ride for free, per our
employer's instructions. These same losers will then go to the
back of the bus, pull out a $150 cell phone with $50+ per
month service, and complain loudly into the phone about what a
jerk I am for asking for the fare!
I'm sure there are folks that honestly can't afford $45 per
month for broadband internet service but I'm convinced that not
having this service @ home is matter of choice...like buying that
$50 bus pass at the beginnig of the month or begging a Bus
driver for a ride 50 times per month. Bottom line.... you afford
what you need or want and discard the rest as "too expensive".
Life's about choices and we are judged not only about what
choices we make, but how well we manage those choices. If
there were no more folks who could afford broadband service,
ISP's would be declaring 100% saturation and doubling their
monthly rates.
Is broadband overpriced? You bet! But since the Federal
Government is in bed with ISP's, we have little choice but to pay
the bill.
http://www.newnetworks.com/broadbandscandals.htm
your open mouth and come up with a cheap alternative. Once you
begin to understand the total expenses involved, your opinions
might become a bit more rational.
- The problem is not cost, its available coverage
- by FarmerChet February 24, 2006 10:55 AM PST
- A key data point is missing in this article.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Would EV-DO Help?
- by dghess February 24, 2006 1:46 PM PST
- It is possible to use EV-DO to get 500-700 kbps accross most of the US where CDMA wireless service is available.
- Like this View reply
Processing -
- What about Satelite?
- by gwats1957 February 24, 2006 5:45 PM PST
- DirecTV offers broadband over their US satelite system for the
- Like this View all 2 replies
Processing -
(12 Comments)It is estimated that only 40% of all homes in the United States have access to Broadband of some kind.
I live in a rural area. We can use dial-up only. There is nothing else.
We will never get cable or dsl as we are too far from a city.
The providers have saturated the available markets and don't have a base of *new* users to pitch to.
Once they can get out to the 60% of homes with no boradband access its certain that the internet adoption numbers will climb.
1. Would this be something that you would be interested in?
2. Would you be willing to pay $30 a month to get it?
I have been trying to work with carriers to prove in a business case to offer such a service and would be interested in your feedback.
lower 48 states right along with network TV coverage if you live
beyond the usable signal range of a major US TV market. A few $$
$ invested and you're online!