Comments on: Municipal broadband and wireless projects map
Government-sponsored projects to provide fiber-optic or wireless networks are taking off across the United States, as are efforts to legislate the issue in state capitols.
Government-sponsored projects to provide fiber-optic or wireless networks are taking off across the United States, as are efforts to legislate the issue in state capitols.
December 4, 2009 6:13 PM PST
December 4, 2009 4:56 PM PST
December 4, 2009 4:25 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
John Roberts
CNET News.com product development
John Roberts
CNET News.com product development
municipal communication networks and the control of the
legislature and executive branches at the time the laws were
enacted. I'll bet it shows how pro-business and anti-american
(citizens anyway) the GOP has become.
We aren't exactly a red state.
municipal communication networks and the control of the
legislature and executive branches at the time the laws were
enacted. I'll bet it shows how pro-business and anti-american
(citizens anyway) the GOP has become.
We aren't exactly a red state.
The legislation limited networks in WA state is very limited. First, it applies only to public utility districts (read rural electric co-ops). Second, it requires that the books segregate costs for the telecom networ, but doesn't explicitly prohibit sudsidization. Most PUDs have interpreted the legislation to limit retail ISPs. So they provide wholesale broadband only. That's it. Not too bad, as these things go.
The legislation limited networks in WA state is very limited. First, it applies only to public utility districts (read rural electric co-ops). Second, it requires that the books segregate costs for the telecom networ, but doesn't explicitly prohibit sudsidization. Most PUDs have interpreted the legislation to limit retail ISPs. So they provide wholesale broadband only. That's it. Not too bad, as these things go.
production team here at News.com. Can you contact me directly
so I can get a better understanding of what is and isn't working
for you? My email address is andyl@cnet.com.
production team here at News.com. Can you contact me directly
so I can get a better understanding of what is and isn't working
for you? My email address is andyl@cnet.com.
Please keep sending us information about city initiatives to pipe broadband to the home via these Talkback postings. We appreciate your help in making this map as comprehensive as possible.
Utopia Project Includes 16 cities:
Lindon, Orem, Payson, Perry, Brigham City, Tremonton, Washington, Vineyard, Riverton, Cedar City, Murray, Midvale, West Valley City, Centerville, Cedar Hills, & Layton
(for reference see utopianet.org)
The Provo Project is called iProvo and it is fiber
Thanks
http://www.co.oakland.mi.us/wireless/
At 910 square miles and a population 1.2 million I understand it's one of the largest government broadband wireless programs around.
http://www.co.oakland.mi.us/wireless/
At 910 square miles and a population 1.2 million I understand it's one of the largest government broadband wireless programs around.
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/94/SB/PDF/09400SB0499sam001.pdf
Good think we have a democratically controlled state legislature. Otherwise Rauschenberger's bill might have moved...
Thanks for your comment!
- Illinois legislation
- by May 3, 2005 3:36 PM PDT
- Your map indicates that there is no language pending in Illinois to limit municipal broadband when, in fact, Republican gubernatorial candidate state Senator Steve Rauschenberger has introduced preemptive language (SB 499):
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Illinois legislation
- by Maggie Reardon May 4, 2005 7:20 AM PDT
- I just checked the map, and it already indicates that Illinois has pending legislation to limit municipal communications.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 5 pages (137 Comments)http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/94/SB/PDF/09400SB0499sam001.pdf
Good think we have a democratically controlled state legislature. Otherwise Rauschenberger's bill might have moved...
Thanks for your comment!