Comments on: Is GPS liability next?
Who's on the hook when a navigation system's instructions result in an accident?
Who's on the hook when a navigation system's instructions result in an accident?
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
A man is crossing the railroad and paying attention to the GPS.
I'm glad that that man has enough intelligence left in its brain to
went out of the car... Or was this a GPS order?
Doesn't the military service that provides the GPS signal warns
you about inaccuracies due to "defense reasons"?
BTW, I will say anyone who turns on to a set of train tracks because a GPS unit told him to is nuts! I know people have become lazy over the years, but that is beyond anything I ever thought I would hear about. Wonder if he would have driven into a lake if it told him to.
as we speak. This sounds like a perfect way for the lawyers to
make some more easy money. Of course it takes stupid people
on juries to actually do the dirty deed but that's never been a
problem in our country. There are plenty of stupid people who
get on juries.
This will probably work because it follows the tried and true
formula for liability cases...
Stupid person + stupid action + ambulance chasing lawyer =
money.
that wrecked! This is just another example of the news over
sensationalizing common sense.
Wouldn't that insulate the manufacturer from being sued?
If they are successfully sued, I can see a new message showing up "If you want to use our GPS press here, agree not to sue and to mandatory arbitration" ;)
According to the GPS.
It becomes a matter of who puts the info into the GPS.
Surely it is the responsibility of the GPS owner to update the parameters.
Garbage in, rubbish out, as they say.
Mike.
There was a time when stupid people simply got themselves killed by doing something stupid. Nowadays, they are protected so they are able to mature and breed. Just look at all the people voting for Obama and Huckabee.
I see stupid people. They're everywhere and they vote!
Since common sense isn't that common anymore, how about I give a helpful suggestion: READ!
If a GPS told me to cross train tracks that did not have an obvious road crossing, I'd keep driving past that point and let the GPS do an automatic re-route.
Most GPS devices warn you a good 3-400 feet in advance of route changes, so there's really no excuse for not looking ahead to see where you're going. So far, I have not had to make any "split second" driving decisions while using a GPS since I'm willing to miss the turn, come back around, and get back on route rather than making sudden movements in traffic.
The GPS is a tool that aids in navigation. It is not a replacement for paying attention while driving.
A map is clearly an aid, but no one can use it without applying common sense. Same thing for a GPS. Otherwise we will have to start including disclaimers in paper maps.
Call me crazy, but a driver should 1) pay attention to the road & is responsible at all times to know what road conditions are, 2) stop, look, listen, and live.
Sound advice when I was 15 getting my learner's permit, and I think those words still apply today.
What nobody has reported, and what I am curious about...is did this moron actually turn onto the track or just get stuck in the crossing? Common sense says "Um, thats a railroad track".
Of course in the "Its everybody's fault but mine" society we have, I'm sure he'll sue the GPS Manufacturer.....and lose.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/248336/Man_Blames_Rental_Car_GPS_for_His_Accident_with_Train
Beyond being a moron, I like this tech's understanding of physics. He got out of the car and waived at the train operator to get his attention. Sure given the weight of the train he would have been able to stop it IF he had run TWO MILES ahead!!
No one wants to assume responsibility for their actions anymore. As soon as something bad happens, people are quick to point the finger at someone else and raise a lawsuit because it's "their fault."
What if the GPS had told the person to turn off of a 50 foot bridge into the water. Would a reasonably sane person say "well the GPS told me to 'jump off the bridge' so I'd better do it." Or would a reasonably sane person say "There must be something wrong with the GPS, this isn't right."
He'd have a valid excuse if the tracks were covered with snow and not visible, and he mistook it for the roadway. But to blame it on the GPS???
Let's change the scenario. Instead of driving down a railroad track, he turned right into the path and right-of-way of an on-coming school bus, causing an accident that resulted in the death of 45 children and the bus driver.
Nope. I don't care what the map or the GPS say. They aren't the ones driving, you are.
- Virtual will never replace reality.....
- by klank10 January 16, 2008 9:09 AM PST
- While our technology continues to evolve, our biology remains --
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)Is it possible we depend on someone to tell us what's right and what's wrong.. Or is it possible we can still have those thoughts on our own...
As the technology becomes more refined and we start to incorporate the newly developing technology - things will get better - mean while we'll have to keep thinking!
The Technology exists and these who understand and care can see what's coming-up next..
http://www.oceantomoauctions.com/OTA_Catalogue_Lot.asp?eventid=42008&Lot=40