Comments on: Microsoft mapping goes 3D
New Virtual Earth interface merges gaming world photorealism with images of real-world cities.
![]()
New Virtual Earth interface merges gaming world photorealism with images of real-world cities.
![]()
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
You're saying Keyhole now has the same 3D rendered urban environments as Live Local? Guess it's been to long since I've used Keyhole.
Microsoft supports their OS and their browser.
As far as this user is concerned, Microsoft don't as they don't offer me any services.
Go Google Earth!
***
***
whatev. i've been using LiveLocal for a while now. I made the "switch" from Google. The new 3d version rocks. soon you will be able to use Microsoft's Flight Sim to fly the whole world on your computer. that, is sweet... but again, only 96% of comoputer users will be able to use it.
Google Earth made for a much nicer presentation to executives because of the cool zooming feature and flyover street mapping. However, one of the major drawbacks to using GE as a consumer tool is the idea that potential customers need to download a 10+ megabyte client program (and learn how to use it) to access the data we were presenting.
As others have noted, Virtual Earth doesn't have the same "wow factor" and it is sometimes clunky due to bandwidth issues, but it was able to map our data just as accurately. The high-resolution "bird's eye view," where available, was particularly useful in our application. The fact that VE was browser-based also made our application more intuitive to use for "casual" or "consumer" web surfers.
Both applications work well, it just depends what you're trying to do with them. Google Earth seems more like a research tool to me, and Virtual Earth seems like it's geared to advertising (which is the main point of the article, of course).
This new Virtual Earth site from Microsoft is in-browser and blows away Google Maps, and in fact blows away Google Earth too.
Of course people have a choice, but Google Maps / Earth feels like yesterday's news and yesterday's "wow", there's a new player in this space and it's looking very good.
Again, it depends on what you're doing. Looking for Someone's house? Streets and Trips. Mapping out a roadtrip? Streets and trips. Detailing a project where a 360* Flyby with 3D Topography is needed: GE or VE.
I think before they jump too deep into 3Ding too many cities... they need to get more high res images for rural areas.
Eventually I'd like to be able to zoom in and see enough detail to spy someone picking their nose at the time the sat snapped a photo. 3D is nice, but without high res sat imagry, its worthless.
Now at least with Google, their stuff just works. It is WC3 compliant and works on all platforms and browsers.
This is why I trust Google to give me their search results.
Microsoft search is sure to be political and point users to Windows every which way.
^&*% that. Give me Google any day.
- simulator
- by kimoggun November 16, 2006 8:08 PM PST
- When from here compared to it develops in small quantity, it will enter with the inside and direct oneself will drive Hael flag and it will fly it will come and go and between the building and virtual sightseeing system Doe who sightsees cyo will embody virtual sightseeing lye cotton poem myul ley to sprout (MODEL s-02) this system there must be system Korea where is not the United States " shj1831" This as the epoch-making product which all has both the efficiency and a practicality of top at the world-wide beginning to develop about does the field...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(21 Comments)